Click the star to add/remove an item to/from your individual schedule.
You need to be logged in to avail of this functionality.
Log in
- Convenors:
-
Sarah Kilpeläinen
(Tampere University)
aimee ambrose (Sheffield Hallam University)
Send message to Convenors
- Formats:
- Panel
- Streams:
- Navigating Conflict, Governance, and Activism
- :
- Linnanmaa Campus, SÄ124
- Sessions:
- Monday 19 August, -, -
Time zone: Europe/Helsinki
Short Abstract:
Decarbonising societies requires transitions in multiple sectors. Transitions not only have technological implications but are also deeply personal and linked to wider societal transformations. This panel explores the value of oral histories in facilitating current and future just transitions.
Long Abstract:
The need to transition away from fossil fuel-based systems to low carbon systems is crucial for achieving a carbon neutral society. These transitions affect multiple sectors, including heating, mobility, energy, water, and the sharing economy and are not purely technical but also have profound social, spatial, and cultural implications.
The current transitions are not unprecedented, and this panel aims to open up discussion about the use and value of oral history approaches in just transitions. Oral history methods provide a unique perspective on the experiences, perceptions, and practices of people who have witnessed or participated in past transitions. Oral histories can shed light on the factors that shaped choices and practices, the impacts of transitions on different communities including changes in lifestyle, spatial arrangements, everyday practices and meaning, social interactions within the community, as well as challenges and opportunities associated with these transitions. Furthermore, they can offer insights into what we can learn from past transitions for future just transitions.
This proposed panel explores questions such as how individuals experience and make sense of past transitions they have experienced how different cultural and social factors shape the adoption and use of new behaviours and practices, and what oral histories can reveal about the ways in which individuals respond to past transitions. The panel will also explore how this information can be used to inform current and future policy and planning.
By examining these complex issues, the panel aims to contribute to a more nuanced and holistic understanding of just transitions.
Accepted papers:
Session 1 Monday 19 August, 2024, -Paper short abstract:
We examine heating transitions in four European countries over 70 years. We uncover societal impacts and justice implications of past transitions, as well as the importance of inclusive, community-engaged approaches for enabling equitable present and future heating transitions.
Paper long abstract:
Home heating is a major source of carbon emissions and thus a key sector to decarbonize. Simultaneously, domestic heating transitions are not only technical in nature but are also deeply personal and affect the ways people use energy in multiple ways.
This collaborative paper delves into the multifaceted realm of heating transitions in four European countries (Finland, Romania, Sweden and the UK) over the last 70 years through the work of the interdisciplinary JUSTHEAT project. By combining oral histories, the work of a network of artists as well as facilitated public conversations we gain a nuanced understanding of the historical development of heating systems and practices as well as their impacts on individuals' lives and the broader society. This supports capturing impacts of past transitions and enables a clearer picture of justice implications of past, present and future domestic heating transitions.
We will share key results derived from our fieldwork and analysis, bringing out specific national insights as well as cross-cutting themes that support our understanding of domestic heating transitions as more than technological transitions.
We reflect on the potential of engaging with diverse communities and the importance of recognizing the voices and experiences of individuals and communities in the pursuit of sustainable and equitable heating practices across Europe. This inclusive approach not only fosters a sense of ownership and empowerment but can also inform policy making to enable more inclusive and just heating transitions that prioritise the well-being of all citizens.
Paper short abstract:
This research explores how the systemic energy crisis was experienced during the 1990s in Georgia including the effects on daily life, health, and well-being. It contributes to understanding the coping mechanisms and adaptive strategies to ease energy-related hardship during societal transformations
Paper long abstract:
This study investigates the lived experience of a decade-long energy crisis in post-Soviet Georgia during the 1990s. During this decade, the country transitioned from a Soviet Union republic to an independent state, resulting in the complete breakdown of the existing economic system, including the energy infrastructure, and widespread energy poverty. This research explores how the systemic energy crisis was experienced during the 1990s in Georgia, including the effects on daily life, health, and well-being. Additionally, it examines the coping mechanisms and adaptive strategies used to ease energy-related hardship.
While designing this research, I was guided by the consideration that data about the lived experience of energy-related hardship in Georgia during the 1990s are not readily available and need to be collected by tapping into the memory and reflections of those who lived through this historical period. Therefore, for this study the central methods of data collection are oral history and, to some extent, autoethnography.
The study contributes to advancing our understanding about how individuals and communities experience transformative change that impacts energy infrastructure and energy services, and which adaptive mechanisms or preventive strategies may ease energy-related hardship during large-scale societal transformations. This understanding can help in planning, managing, and navigating just energy transition processes. As for the methodological considerations, both oral history and autoethnography have the potential to bring the voices of living witnesses into the research more forcefully, and to put a human face on societal transformations and historical processes.
Paper short abstract:
This paper explores the dynamics between energy culture and energy efficiency interventions and how these interventions shape vulnerability to energy poverty. The narratives of the past revealed that households' energy culture was both resistant to and shaped by energy efficiency interventions.
Paper long abstract:
Most policies behind residential energy efficiency interventions aim to reduce fossil fuel reliance, mitigate climate change, achieve carbon emission reductions, and mitigate energy poverty. However, they mainly focus on the technical aspects, often neglecting the cultural ones. Thus, understanding energy culture is crucial to developing energy efficiency policies that grasp the human dimension of energy use, especially in an energy poverty setting. This paper presents the findings from qualitative research studying local energy culture and the lived experience of recipients of two energy efficiency programmes in Coyhaique city, in the Chilean Patagonia. The aim was to explore changes in household energy culture associated with residential energy efficiency interventions and how these interventions may influence vulnerability to energy poverty in social housing. The findings show that energy culture was both resistant to and shaped by energy efficiency interventions. Both responses have implications for households’ vulnerability to energy poverty and represent a fragile energy transition. The endurance of cultural patterns was revealed through households’ narratives, which provided a retrospective evaluation of their life experience with home heating. Participants’ narratives presented a dynamic switch between the memories of the past (how their lives used to be with firewood) and the present (how it is now with a new fuel). Findings from this research suggest that the energy culture in Coyhaique’s households is configured by a persistent attachment to firewood, sustained over time. Even after participation in two energy efficiency interventions and changing firewood, wood burning continued to shape households’ energy culture.
Paper short abstract:
This paper explores the narratives concerning past, present and imagined future of Longyearbyen’s energy system and the tension between different residents and actors. We consider how representations of the cultural identities are intertwined with narratives of the ongoing energy transition.
Paper long abstract:
Svalbard and the Longyearbyen community is facing dramatic climate change, as well as undergoing an energy transition from coal to temporary diesel and gradual increasing phase-in of renewables such as wind, PV and storage solutions.
In the Longyearbyen community the ongoing energy transition is intrinsically linked to Svalbard’s history as a coal producer and place identities of ‘mining towns’. The transition from coal has been ongoing for several years. However, the last mine (G7) is still in operation and the planned close-down extended due to new energy demand in the wake of the Russian aggression on Ukraine. In addition, the Longyearbyen community has changed into a site for government sector employment, tourist and research activities in line with Norwegian political strategies. In result several residents have experience from previous transitions while others only reside in the town for a few years.
This paper explores the narratives concerning past, present and imagined future of Longyearbyen’s energy system and the tension between different groups of residents and actors in framing these narratives. Related to this we consider how representations of the cultural identities of people at Svalbard, and in particular energy-workers, are intertwined with narratives of the ongoing energy transition.
We draw our findings from in-depth interviews and a survey conducted in Longyearbyen in summer/fall 2023. The article will apply narratives of 3-4 key informants as case-studies.
Paper short abstract:
This paper analyzes Rocky Cree efforts to recover traditional place names in a hydro-developed landscape in central Canada. Challenges involved show the complexities of recovering past environments using oral history and the entangled politics of colonial reconciliation and environmental justice.
Paper long abstract:
This paper investigates the use of oral history to recover Indigenous environmental knowledge to inform just transitions in Northern Manitoba, Canada. Since time immemorial, the Asiniskaw Ithiniwak (Rocky Cree) used place names to carry messages about how to use and care for the land and resources in accordance with the teachings of the Creator. While many names were lost to them through successive eras of settler-colonial remapping and development projects, the Rocky Cree at Nisichawayasihk Cree Nation are now embarked on a project to recover the names by studying oral histories recorded from Elders in their community. Recovering and using names is viewed as a precursor to a just energy transition for First Nations people that includes reconciliation and healing, culture and education, movement to self governance, and observations of traditional sovereignty over resources. Conversely, a major driver behind the original oss of the names was the crown-corporate redevelopment of Treaty 5 lands by Manitoba Hydro, part of an ongoing social welfare energy plan established in the 1950s justified as bringing clean and affordable power to the southern part of the province. The resultant watershed changes in the north relocated communities, altered familiar ecological patterns and watercourses, and completed submerged or destroyed large areas - upsetting the reference point for many of the Rocky Cree place names. The challenges involved in recovering the names reflect the complex nature of reconstructing lost environments using oral history, as well as the entangled politics of environmental justice in energy and resource use.
Paper short abstract:
Our interdisciplinary paper examines the interplay of oral histories, a network of appointed artists and public conversations in researching just heating transitions in a European context as part of the JUSTHEAT project.
Paper long abstract:
The decarbonisation of domestic heating is a key component of the transition to more sustainable societies. This transition is not only a switch from one technology to another, instead it also encompasses far-reaching changes to personal lifestyles as well as practices and understandings of energy use. Capturing this thematically rich transition requires interdisciplinary and multi-method research approaches.
By integrating social sciences, building sciences, and the fine arts, our research crosses disciplinary and methodological boundaries and probes deeply into the realm of domestic heating and its associated practices and themes. We collect an extensive set of oral histories as primary data set to capture personal narratives of past domestic heating transitions in four European countries. In addition, the inclusion of local artists in each case study location enriches data collection and analysis and also fosters the engagement with local communities and policy makers. Using diverse disciplinary and methodological perspectives supports a rich understanding of past transitions that in turn also supports enabling just and equitable future heating transitions.
We will reflect on the value of our interdisciplinary and multi-method research approach in facilitating just heating transitions and in supporting engagement with communities and policy makers. We will also share challenges we have encountered as well as best practices to meet them to contribute to support future interdisciplinary and multi-method approaches in energy studies.
Paper short abstract:
Uptake of cycling remains extremely low, yet it offers a vital route to decarbonising transport. In developing a set of individual ‘mobility biographies’, we provide a novel perspective on how past experiences can shape choices around cycling in later life and what this means for a just transition.
Paper long abstract:
Despite recognition of the benefits of cycling for decarbonising mobility, and increased policy attention and investment, limited progress has been made across Europe and beyond in increasing levels of cycling. Consequently, efforts to research determinants of travel mode choice remain important, particularly amongst those who are known to be less likely to cycle, such as people in mid or later-life. This research adopts a historical perspective on the role of longer-term trajectories and ingrained cultural and societal attitudes in shaping travel choices around everyday cycling.
With the view that policy intervention is intertwined with locally specific mobility cultures and given that as an everyday practice, travel choice is rarely documented in traditional historical sources, this paper makes a contribution through an oral history approach in Sheffield, UK. This paper builds on the understanding that such travel choices can be shaped by key life events (e.g., moving home, changing jobs) but also by more nuanced factors, such as how an individual’s perception of their mobility might change over time. Oral history interviews are employed to develop a set of ‘mobility biographies’, helping to show how participants’ early experiences may shape attitudes and behaviours around cycling in later life. This will draw on a sample of 14 Sheffield residents aged 50+ and provide insights into the under-researched area of cycling amongst those in mid or later-life. This application of oral histories is novel and seeks to inform how approaches to increasing cycling can be brought into closer dialogue with just transitions.
Paper short abstract:
This paper draws upon the newly opened records of the UK energy users’ consultative council in the late twentieth century to enrich the ongoing discussion on just energy transition by contributing a longitudinal perspective to the debate.
Paper long abstract:
This paper draws upon historical research on the domestic energy transition in late twentieth-century Britain to consider the issue of just energy transition in the past and present. Using oral history databases and archival records related to the UK’s national energy suppliers and consumer organisations, this paper argues that the UK energy system underwent an unjust energy transition caused by the distinct material configurations of modern energy and its associated energy vulnerability—both of which emerged during the 1960s–1970s. In this sociotechnical process, the existing technological artefact (e.g. the pre-paid metre), billing cycles, consumer credit provisions and domestic practices and habits amplified the vulnerability of certain energy user types, who included those belonging to low-income, elderly, single-parent and ethnic minority families. To fully understand this crucial historical episode, this paper will survey the newly opened records of the UK energy users’ consultative council (EUCC), which illustrates how vulnerable energy users experienced the transition process, as their hardships were reported by local and regional EUCC committees and by users themselves.
The paper has three aims. First, it will highlight the value of a user-centred perspective to energy transition, especially in illuminating the experience of marginalised users. Second, it will consider the methodological issues related to the use of oral history and other qualitative evidence in researching the lived experiences of energy users. Third, it argues that revisiting the experience of unjust transition in the past will enrich our discussion of how to realise a just energy transition in the current century.