Click the star to add/remove an item to/from your individual schedule.
You need to be logged in to avail of this functionality.
Log in
- Convenors:
-
Matthew Hannaford
(University of Lincoln)
David Nash (University of Brighton)
Bárbara Direito (Centro Interuniversitário de História das Ciências e da Tecnologia, NOVA FCT, Portugal)
Send message to Convenors
- Formats:
- Panel
- Streams:
- Climate Change and Knowledge
- Location:
- Linnanmaa Campus, L8
- Sessions:
- Monday 19 August, -
Time zone: Europe/Helsinki
Short Abstract:
This panel interrogates the historical emergence of climate coloniality in African former colonial contexts. It draws upon a diversity of colonial experiences to examine the multidirectional relationships between ‘Western’ and local weather and climate knowledges and material practices.
Long Abstract:
Contemporary analyses of climate change impacts and adaptation rarely interrogate historical contexts of colonialism and repeated disaster. This is despite recognition of how ongoing ‘climate colonialities’ shape vulnerability via the reproduction of dominant framings and material interventions. Central to understanding climate coloniality is an examination of its historical emergence within places of encounter between agents of empire and colonised populations. This panel brings together papers that explore the (trans)formation of ‘Western’ and local weather and climate knowledges and material practices in African former colonial contexts. In particular, the panel considers the multidirectional relationships between climate knowledges and material practices to understand (i) how colonial discourses and ways of knowing gave rise to transitions in material structures, for example food and other resource systems or disaster relief, and (ii) how weather events and climate-related disasters (re)shaped such knowledges, for instance via their impacts on livelihoods or human health. The panel also welcomes contributions that explore how local understandings of climate influenced thought among Westerners. In drawing contrasts and comparisons, the panel aims to examine a diversity of colonial experiences and configurations in Africa and to redress the predominant focus on Anglophone regions or settler states. Lastly, and in line with the conference theme, the panel questions how contemporary understandings of climate change might benefit from these climate histories.
Accepted papers:
Session 1 Monday 19 August, 2024, -Paper short abstract:
This paper compares climate knowledges amongst Europeans in southeast Africa between the sixteenth and nineteenth centuries. It examines shifts in climate knowledge over time and explores the crystallisation of climate coloniality in the region.
Paper long abstract:
Climate was one amongst a select number of recurring themes in documents detailing the long history of colonial occupation in Mozambique. While writings on local climatic hazards such as drought and floods have received more attention in recent years (e.g. Hannaford and Beck 2021), for the most part African climates were conceptualised and described in terms of their (in)salubrity and perceived implications for colonial expansion. This presentation traces the deep history of such colonialities of climate knowledge in southeast Africa from the sixteenth through the nineteenth centuries. For most of the period the focus is primarily on Portuguese records, but the paper seeks to compare and contrast these with climate knowledges emanating from later (nineteenth century) writings found within the archives of other colonial powers. The implications of climate knowledges for material practices are also considered.
Paper short abstract:
In this paper, we propose to analyze the discourses on aridity and the "lack of rain" in the processes of building the post-colonial Cape Verdean nation-state. How those discourses constructed through time, spaces and groups in the society have created specific meanings of Nature and Environment?
Paper long abstract:
This contribution is part of an ongoing multidisciplinary and international research project on the Cape Verde archipelago whose aim is to problematize the underway social and cultural dynamics in the face of a long and prolonged drought situation. Although based on the ethnographic method, the project mobilizes the environmental and social history. Indeed, the current water shortage situation, while alarming (the state of Cape Verde has declared a state of hydric emergency in 2020 and food emergency in 2022), is not unprecedented on the scale of a long history. From its earliest days, Cape Verdean society has had to cope with a Sahelian climate and unbridled exploitation of resources by colonial system in which the ressources management is still in some ways rooted.
In this context, we want to analyze more precisely, from an anthropological perspective and in dialogue with history, the discourses (in all their temporalities) on aridity and the "lack of rain" in the processes of building the post-colonial Cape Verdean nation-state. To this end, we will analyze colonial and post-colonial stories about the archipelago's landscapes, observing their continuities and differences. We believe that in order to understand the meaning of the constructions of nature for Cape Verdeans, it is not enough to understand the generic properties of the natural environment. It is also necessary to understand the concepts around the relationship between people and nature, each time specific to groups in the society (institutions, politics, farmers, young people, older people, emigrated people, etc.) and to particular time.
Paper short abstract:
This paper interrogates the relationships between ‘Western’ and local weather and climate knowledges and material practices in nineteenth century Southern Mozambique drawing on a set of diaries, memoirs, and reports.
Paper long abstract:
This paper interrogates the relationships between ‘Western’ and local weather and climate knowledges and material practices in nineteenth century Southern Mozambique. It draws on a set of diaries, memoirs, and reports written by different observers, found mostly in Portuguese archives and libraries, to examine how the region’s climate, prone to drought and irregular rainfall, was framed by these observers and how their views were shaped by African informants and by different local social and agricultural knowledges and practices. Introducing a transimperial dimension, this paper also seeks to compare these views with climate-related views drawn from sources focusing on the neighbouring regions of Zululand and the Transvaal (present-day KwaZulu-Natal and Mpumalanga, in South Africa), which have been the subject of several scholarly works in recent years.
Paper short abstract:
This paper presents a reconstruction of nineteenth century rainfall variability over present-day Mozambique derived from historical sources.
Paper long abstract:
Rainfall variability posed significant challenges for agrarian communities across the area occupied by present-day Mozambique during the nineteenth century. As a result, accounts of weather conditions and their impacts upon livelihoods, infrastructure and social/cultural activities are widely recorded in historical sources. This paper draws on diaries, memoirs and reports from the region, written by mainly British and Portuguese observers, to present a semi-quantitative reconstruction of rainfall variability spanning the full nineteenth century. It highlights episodes of drought and above-average rainfall, and then draws comparisons with annually-resolved rainfall reconstructions for other parts of southern Africa, to explore subcontinental patterns of nineteenth century rainfall variability.
Paper short abstract:
The article analyzes the causes which the communities of the Xai-Xai, remain in areas at risk of natural disasters, and show that it results from disputes, conflicts and negotiations around the meanings of risk attributed by communities and the state and distrust communities resettlement processes.
Paper long abstract:
This article examines the resistance of communities to remain in the areas of risk to natural disasters in Xai Xai,
province of Gaza, from the point of view of an arena, where various logic's and strategies on the conception of risk on
natural disasters Confronting, on the one hand, communities and the state and NGOs. The basic assumption is that
regardless of the type of organization or mode of intervention, a resettlement action of communities residing in areas
considered as risk inevitably gives rise to the interaction between two social actors belonging to Different worlds (the
state and communities) whose knowledge standards are regulated by a variety of logic's. The analytical incursion of
this research shows that during the period in which resettlement interventions in Xai-Xai were in effect, they allowed a
series of confrontation, disputes and negotiations between the actors involved in the arena (communities and the
state. In this sense, the research shows that the actors and strategic groups are in constant negotiations, disputes
and confrontation. On the other hand, although the actors were heterogeneous and with differentiated interests, within
the community of Xai-Xai, all have the power to interfere in their context even if it is in an unequal way. It was
evidenced that the actors and strategic groups not only have different interests and resources, but also act according
to different modes of action and cultural points of view of the world.