Paper Short Abstract:

This paper highlights the importance of indigenous knowledge in human-animal conflict management contexts. The study will therefore illustrate how indigenous groups from various African communities use their knowledge and folk narratives to manage conflicts arising from human-animal contact.

Paper Abstract:

This paper highlights the importance of indigenous knowledge in human-animal conflict management contexts. Land is recognized in this paper as the space where human-animal conflicts occur, so its relevance to indigenous groups will be studied. The study will briefly discuss the relationship between the Igbo indigenous group and their land, drawing examples from the author’s personal experience. The study will therefore illustrate how indigenous groups from various African communities use their knowledge and folk narratives to manage conflicts arising from human-animal contact. Folk narrative traditions such as these may offer pathways as we try to develop benevolent stewardship of nature.

Paper Short Abstract:

How is wilderness – as an environmental domain that humans do not engage with perceptually – imagined and represented in oral narratives? Two case studies about humanlike figures from Italy and India will elucidate the local relationships and engagements between humans and wilderness.

Paper Abstract:

In his 2000 book “The Perception of the Environment”, the anthropologist Tim Ingold describes the perception of an organism – both human and nonhuman – as directly tied to the presence of an environment of other living and non-living beings that surrounds and interacts with them. In this regard, he mentions repeatedly the concept of “perceptual engagement with the environment”, mostly referring to humans who need to deal with their environment and its sensorial perception for their living processes.

Despite the undeniable anthropic influence on the world that we inhabit, wilderness is still a crucial element of our planet and biosphere. Wilderness, in this sense, can be defined as an environmental domain that humans do not engage with perceptually, due to physical distance or geographical barriers. Conversely, wilderness is a consistent part of human imagination and narrative.

In this paper, two case studies – from the Italian Alps and from the Karbi Indigenous community of Northeast India – will illustrate how wilderness has been imagined and represented through humanlike figures within local narratives, namely the Italian “uomo selvatico” and the Karbi “Kenglong-Po”. Both figures are connected to wilderness and the idea of wild in the respective geographical areas, articulating the relationship between humans and the wild environments that they cannot access physically and/or perceptually.

Paper Short Abstract:

Focusing on two instances of ‘touch’ over cows’ bodies in Turkey, this paper differentiates between veterinary and zootechnical care. While veterinary care and caring forms of touch create a reciprocal indeterminacy that can undo the commodity form, zootechnical care solidifies control.

Paper Abstract:

In defining cows as globally traded commodities, legal and veterinary regulations allocate the legitimacy of touch over their bodies. While the legal regulations distinguish between “licit” and “illicit” forms of touch (Rosenberg 2017), veterinary medicine often legitimizes tactile interventions on cows' bodies by emphasizing the notion of care. In both contexts, touch becomes desirable as it contributes to the (re)production of cows for/as a commodity. Yet, the touch also introduces uncertainty in specific contexts, where care can disrupt or create a dent in the productivity regime. By analyzing two instances of ‘touch’ over cows’ bodies in Turkey's production and circulation process, I would like to explore the uncertainty introduced by touch, establishing a differentiation between veterinary and zootechnical care. While veterinary care and caring forms of touch create a reciprocal indeterminacy that can suspend the commodity form, zootechnical care solidifies control. The indeterminacy introduced by veterinary care can both undo and reinstitute the commodity form, aligning care with the broader "economies of touch" (Ahmed 2000) governing cows' bodies through zootechnical means.