Click the star to add/remove an item to/from your individual schedule.
You need to be logged in to avail of this functionality.
Log in
- Convenors:
-
Cheryl R Doss
(Tufts University)
Marya L Hillesland (University of Oxford)
Send message to Convenors
- Chair:
-
Cheryl R Doss
(Tufts University)
- Format:
- Panel
- Stream:
- Gender
- Location:
- Palmer G.02
- Sessions:
- Thursday 29 June, -
Time zone: Europe/London
Short Abstract:
This session will consider feminist approaches to understanding household water security that highlight the gendered social relations and power dynamics both within households and within communities. The papers will draw on both qualitative and quantitative methods across a range of contexts.
Long Abstract:
Water security is an increasingly important concern, especially in areas where climate change is resulting in floods or droughts. In this session, we will consider feminist approaches to understanding household water security that highlight the gendered social relations and power dynamics both within households and within communities. Within households, water may be collected from multiple sources and allocated across domestic uses and for livelihood activities. Household members may have different preferences about how and where to acquire water and how it should be used. These may vary not only by gender, but also by age and position within the household. Both men and women may engage in livelihoods that rely on water. Women often combine household work with income-generating work, such as cooking food for sale, planting kitchen gardens, or washing clothes. Youth may contribute to these different activities without playing a large role in the decisions. The choices of water sources will depend on both characteristics of the source – distance, water quality, cost – and of the intended use of the water. The person collecting the water may not be the person making the decisions or using the water. Broader gendered dynamics within the community will also shape household water access and allocation. Social relations may determine those who have access to certain private water sources and not others. The papers in this session will use a range of methods, both qualitative and quantitative, across a range of different contexts to explore these gendered dimensions of water security.
Accepted papers:
Session 1 Thursday 29 June, 2023, -Paper short abstract:
Feminist scholars and activists have drawn attention to the importance of women’s land rights; yet little of this work has focused on the relationship of land and water rights. In this paper we consider the relationship between land and water rights, using a gender lens.
Paper long abstract:
Feminist scholars and activists have drawn attention to the importance of women’s land rights; yet little of this work has focused on the relationship of land and water rights. Within rural households, men and women have different rights to both land and water. This paper analyses these relationships using community profiles and in-depth interviews from two communities as well as survey data on both land and water rights and use collected from multiple adults in rural households in Kilifi County, Kenya. While land tenure patterns are changing in Kenya, with a move to reclassify traditional land tenure systems to freehold , men continue to have stronger tenure rights. In this paper we consider the relationship between land and water rights, using a gender lens. These relationships may play out within the household, where men’s land rights give them rights over the use of water. They may also play out within the community, where gendered social relationships affect land and water rights. Some may lack access to water sources or steer away from certain water sources because of power dynamics embedded in social relationships with regards to where the water source is located. We explore how these gendered relationships affect decisions by men and women within the household about how to collect water and then how to distribute it across both productive and reproductive uses. Finally, we discuss whether the co-existence of different land and water rights exacerbate or challenge gender inequality.
Paper short abstract:
This paper aims to explore intrahousehold decision-making, livelihoods, and household choices in the Brazilian semiarid region. Household surveys were applied in a rural settlement in the Brazilian semiarid region from 2022 to 2023.
Paper long abstract:
The nexus between water, land and food is an intersectoral gender challenge. Water and land are indispensable resources required to ensuring food security. This nexus also plays an essential role in the outcomes for a sustainable rural livelihood attesting a gender approach. This paper aims to explore intrahousehold decision-making, livelihoods, and household choices in the Brazilian semiarid region. Household surveys were applied in a rural settlement in northeastern Brazil from 2022 to 2023. Results pointed that women and men have distinct roles and interests in the use and management of natural resources, and women’s participation in natural resource management is fundamental for women’s empowerment and for a sustainable rural development.
Paper short abstract:
Participation in the water sector gives communities the responsibility to manage their own water security without knowledge, financing and power. We analyse these dynamics at the household and community level, revealing that water-related responsibilisation is fundamentally gendered.
Paper long abstract:
In the water literature, little attention is given to responsibilities in specific adaptation approaches to water risks from climate hazards and poor management of water supply systems. A dominant narrative in natural resources governance states that community ownership of natural resources, and participation in governance processes, enables and enhances sustainability of resources and management systems. This has enabled decentralised, community-based water management which is poorly funded, while key skills for adaptation and system management are insufficiently transferred from experts to community members. Some scholars claim that community participation in the water sector improves water security. We directly refute this claim by arguing that community participation in the water sector gives communities the responsibility to manage their own water security through labour, financial and materiality, without knowledge, financing and power. Drawing on two case studies, one of flood adaptation in Kenya, and one of rural water supply in Ethiopia, we reveal the ways in which responsibilisation plays out differently for men and women. In particular, we find that responsibilisation without capability creates maladaptive coping mechanisms, leaving communities, and particularly women, entrenched in socio-environmental vulnerability. We analyse the tension of power and responsibilities, continuing the emerging academic discussion of responsibilisation as a transfer of responsibilities from the government to people, without financing or power. It is essential to analyse whether people have capabilities to undertake these responsibilities, without compromising their values, revealing that water-related responsibilisation is fundamentally gendered.