Click the star to add/remove an item to/from your individual schedule.
You need to be logged in to avail of this functionality.

P50


Sources and power: crossroads 
Convenors:
Nádia Farage (University of Campinas)
Huon Wardle (St. Andrews University)
Mark Harris (Monash University)
Send message to Convenors
Discussant:
Huon Wardle (St. Andrews University)
Format:
Panel
Transfers:
Open for transfers

Short Abstract:

The panel discusses junctions between the fields of anthropology, history and literary criticism via the problem of ‘the literary source’. It aims to contemplate issues on how to conceptualise and mobilise the written and especially the fictional source in the anthropological text.

Long Abstract:

The panel discusses junctions between anthropology, history and literary criticism via the problem of ‘the literary source’. Revisiting longstanding conversations that traverse the last half of 20th century around the legitimacy of anthropological uses of written sources, we see that these have revolved on giving voice to silenced categories. Literary criticism has convergently brought awareness to the uncertainties and shifts of context in reading sources. These debates further shaped the internal criticism of ethnography, with excellent results on issues including empowerment, political agency or co-authorship.

For historical or literary anthropology, there are further issues that derive from the very status of the written, and especially the fictional source. How is ‘a source’ of knowledge constituted? How to conceptualise this process of constituting a source? Borrowing from A. Gell we may envisage the source as endowed with a capacity to enchant and ‘trap’ thought, but we should not ignore the reverse relationship; the source is both agent and patient. The activity of following the traces that lead to the source (or that the source leaves behind so it can be discovered), suggests a teleological game-like relation between knower and what can be known. The source becomes the mythical origin point of the true knowledge created from it, but it can also play tricks on the would-be knower. Because of the power it holds to itself, and the power that the mind in pursuit of it entertains, the alliance of source and knower is a potentially dangerous one.

Accepted papers: