Click the star to add/remove an item to/from your individual schedule.
You need to be logged in to avail of this functionality,
and to see the links to virtual rooms.
Log in
Accepted Paper:
Opposition of representatives of the intelligentsia of Kyrgyzstan to the policy of Soviet power in the 20s of the twentieth century. On the example of "Letter of the Thirty".
Aida Kubatova
(INSTITUTE OF HISTORY)
Paper short abstract:
In the course of this struggle, the Kyrgyz Soviet statehood was formed by the incredible efforts of prominent political figures of Kyrgyzstan - which, being the foundation of the modern Kyrgyz Republic, was formed.
Paper long abstract:
After the establishment of Soviet power in Turkestan in the 20s of the twentieth century, there was a struggle between representatives of the political elites of Central Asia in the creation of independent states and the definition of borders. In the course of this struggle, the Kyrgyz Soviet statehood was formed by the incredible efforts of prominent political figures of Kyrgyzstan - which, being the foundation of the modern Kyrgyz Republic, was formed. But for the leadership of the country, they sent party leaders from the Center of the Russian Federation. Many of them clearly felt chauvinistic ambitions in relation to the indigenous people, as well as leaders. To counter them, representatives of the intelligentsia of the region wrote a letter to the Center, the so-called "Letter of the Thirty", which made a lot of noise, and later became one of the main causes of political repression. The leader of the Kyrgyz people, Chairman of the Council of People's Commissars (Government) Zhusup Abdrakhmanov, openly wrote about successes, failures and confrontations in his diaries, later these diaries also became the main reason for his arrest. Based on these documents, there will be an attempt to reveal the essence of the topic under consideration.