Click the star to add/remove an item to/from your individual schedule.
You need to be logged in to avail of this functionality.

P28


has 1 film 1
Positive anthropology meets positive psychology: thick or thin descriptions? 
Convenor:
Grant Rich (Walden University)
Send message to Convenor
Format:
Panel
Sessions:
Saturday 10 April, -
Time zone: America/Chicago

Short Abstract:

This symposium gathers thinkers from a range of perspectives to unpack the concepts of a positive psychology and a positive anthropology, to respectfully discuss such issues as whether these disciplines are best viewed as evil twins, sibling rivals, distant cousins, or something else.

Long Abstract:

Since the founding of positive psychology by the then head of the American Psychological Association Martin E. P. Seligman, about twenty years ago (Seligman & Csikszentmihalyi, 2000), the discipline has grown rapidly. The discipline features a dedicated peer reviewed journal, ample symposia at the Annual Convention of the APA, stand alone positive psychology conferences, and encyclopedias, handbooks, and a veritable cottage industry of sole-authored and edited books (e.g., Lopez, 2009, 2011, 2019). Yet the methods and samples of the positive psychology paradigm have been deeply critiqued both within psychology (Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, 2010), and within anthropology, as largely ignoring human diversity and the nuances of well-being as expressed around the globe (e.g., Fischer, 2014; Mathews & Izquierdo, 2009; Thin; 2009). A point of agreement among many anthropologists and psychologists is that well-being has been comparatively neglected by researchers in comparison to studies of negative emotions, cognitions, and behaviors, and dysfunctional social, cultural, and historical systems, such as those that result in violence, or in large health or wealth disparities.

This symposium gathers thinkers from a range of perspectives to unpack the concepts of a positive psychology and a positive anthropology, to respectfully discuss such issues as whether these disciplines are best viewed as evil twins, sibling rivals, distant cousins, or something else (Rich, 2017). Contributions from both psychologists and anthropologists, as well as those in the social sciences and humanities are welcomed.

Accepted papers:

Session 1 Saturday 10 April, 2021, -
Panel Video visible to paid-up delegates