Click the star to add/remove an item to/from your individual schedule.
You need to be logged in to avail of this functionality.
Log in
- Convenors:
-
Cesar Guzman-Concha
(Freie Universität Berlin)
Mariya Ivancheva (University of Strathclyde)
Send message to Convenors
- Location:
- UP 4.209
- Start time:
- 12 April, 2013 at
Time zone: Europe/London
- Session slots:
- 1
Short Abstract:
This panel asks how the 2000s protests of the student movement in Latin America continue or contest the legacy of past waves of student mobilization. We also ask what are the similarities and differences between Latin American student movements and the recent student protests in Western countries
Long Abstract:
Student movements have traditionally been a relevant actor in 20th century Latin American politics. Political change in the region cannot be understood without considering the active role that students played in most countries in the 1920s and 1960s, or in the struggles against military dictatorships in Nicaragua, Brazil, or Argentina. While these episodes have received significant scholarly attention, since the 1990s the interest in student movements has diminished. However, the recent student protest wave has shown that student movements still exert influence and remain a force of change. Over the last years there have been significant student protests in Mexico, Chile, Colombia and Argentina. Still, a great variation marks the causes, claims, outcomes, and repertoires of the student movements. Similarly, their sociopolitical context differs. For example, while in Chile the student movements have been mobilized against the neoliberal orientation of education policies (e.g. privatization, competition, subsidiarity), in Venezuela the field of student protest is split between supporters and opponents of President Chavez's rule. This panel welcomes contributions from the broad fields of social and political sciences. They should shed light on the recent developments of student movements, the implications of their actions, the historic significance of recent struggles and new perspectives that they might open for the region. We ask how the 2000s protests continue or contest the legacy of past waves of student mobilization in Latin America. We also ask what are the similarities and differences between Latin American student movements and recent student protests in Western countries
Accepted papers:
Session 1Paper short abstract:
The paper narrates a wave of student protest at the Bolivarian University in Venezuela. It speaks of the difficulty for students of radical professors to frame their own independent and more radical critique, and the general impasse of critique in post-revolutionary contexts.
Paper long abstract:
The paper deals with the dynamic of protest on the Bolivarian University of Venezuela (UBV). UBV was designed by Chavista intellectuals, former student movements members under the Venezuelan "Fourth Republic". Professors were disappointed their own students did not inherit their radical tradition. Yet, when in 2008/9 UBV faculty were challenged by the emergence of a new UBV student movement, they were all but happy and negated the radical potential and claims of the movement. Under the critical gaze of faculty, who have the credentials of radicals under a more repressive regime, students slowly watered down their critiques to fit within the framework of the Revolution. Contextualizing this wave of protest within the Venezuelan and global history of student protest, I claim that it discloses the imminent paradoxes of internal critique in post-revolutionary contexts. It also shows the challenge of traditional institutions - as universities - to serve as locus of radical reform.
Paper short abstract:
The student movement is hypothesized as an orientation to overcome the segmentation of higher education as fragmented intellectual and consciousness, projecting the struggle on the educational patterns leading to socially differentiated opportunities of exercising intellectual leadership and power.
Paper long abstract:
Beyond the material claims of the student movement in Chile, against the commodification of education and its over-determining effect on social inequality, this paper discusses the latent normative basis of the social movement in terms of intellectual and professional orientations differentiated through higher education. Such a focus limits the analysis of the movement to higher education, but regarding the centrality of the struggle in this segment, it will be considered as illustrative of the whole movement. The student movement is oriented to control the education system as a mechanism of both material and normative social reproduction. In turn, the normative dimension is conditioned, on one hand, by the qualitative segmentation of higher education in direct relation to social stratification. Therefore, higher education for students from poorer social background with lower 'cultural capital' tends to form 'semi-professionals' and subaltern intellectuals, that are subsequently limited to instrumental tasks and away from the administrative centres of decision-making. On the other hand, the university system is highly diversified into 'ideological state apparatuses', which produces organic intellectuals mobilizing particular social interests and cultural values, and also non-organic professionals pursuing social mobility. The specific normative dimension of the student movement is hypothesized as an orientation to overcome the segmentation of higher education as fragmented intellectual and professional consciousness, potentially projecting the struggle on the educational patterns leading to socially differentiated opportunities of exercising intellectual leadership and power. Empirically, the paper uses 29 interviews with academics from different segments of Chilean higher education.