Click the star to add/remove an item to/from your individual schedule.
You need to be logged in to avail of this functionality.
Log in
- Convenors:
-
Jorijn Neyrinck
(Workshop intangible heritage)
Marc Jacobs (ARCHES, University Antwerpen and Vrije Universiteit Brussel)
Send message to Convenors
- Chair:
-
Bert De Munck
(University of Antwerp)
- Discussants:
-
Tim Ingold
(University of Aberdeen)
Anneli Palmsköld (University of Gothenburg)
- Format:
- Panel+Roundtable
- Stream:
- Heritage
- Location:
- MR310, MacRobert
- Sessions:
- Tuesday 3 June, -, -, Wednesday 4 June, -
Time zone: Europe/London
Short Abstract
What does ‘unwriting’ mean in transmitting and documenting embodied crafts knowledge/practice'? And how can the digital world contribute to un-writing the safeguarding of craftership? This panel zooms in on transmission of crafts with focus on transformation in times of digital technology and AI.
Description
Craftership is traditionally seen as based on embodied and tacit knowledge passed on by doing and as at odds with codified and abstract knowledge. Recent technological developments create new opportunities to document and pass on craft knowledge and know-how, but it also brings tensions with embodied knowledge.
How can digitalization contribute to ‘un-writing’ the safeguarding of craftership? This panel zooms in on the transmission of craft knowledge and skills, in times of digital technology and artificial intelligence. It examines how embodied knowledge, the role of the hands, and of eye-hand coordination, continue to matter for learning and safeguarding craftership. How do crafters and others deploy digital approaches to ‘les gestes’, and what approaches regarding embodied knowledge/practice emerge at present? To what extent does embodied knowledge still matter for craftership and what does the advent of AI mean in this respect? And how do these changing contexts of transmission challenge notions of gender, embodiment, affect and performance in relation to craftership, or make room for new (trans)formations and narratives of multivalent cultural knowledge?
Two panel sessions on these themes are followed by a roundtable with Tim Ingold, Anneli Palmsköld, Marc Jacobs, Bert De Munck, Jorijn Neyrinck and N.N.
The first panel session puts focus on crafting, transmitting and transforming, including presentations:
* On (New) Technology: Influence of Tool Selection on Transmission of Embodied Textile Knowledge >Vic Bervoets, Tim Dierckx
* Unwriting the curriculum. Textile exercises and explorations >Clara Vankerschaver
* Immersive Digital Environments for Craft Transmission >Xenophon Zabulis
*On Basket Weaving Knowledge Transfer in the Digital Age >Ian Garcia, Jouke Verlinden
*Crafting machines and crafting the machine: Technology in and as craft >Holly Zijderveld
The 2nd session addresses ethical and policy related perspectives:
*On the New EU Regulation on the Protection of Geographical Indications for Craft Products: Opportunities and Challenges >Vadim Mantrov, Anita Vaivade, Liga Abele
*Unraveling the Interplay of Analog and Digital >Pierre-Antoine Vettorello
*On visual ethnography in safeguarding ICH in Vojvodina >Tatjana Bugarski, Aleksandar Petijević, Bogdan Sekaric
*Futuring craft in the age of planetary crisis >Ils Huygens
Accepted contributions
Session 1 Tuesday 3 June, 2025, -Short abstract
This paper examines how textile tool selection and use, shape the transmission of embodied knowledge in educational contexts and makerspaces. By exploring their impact on preserving, adapting, and transforming crafts, it highlights their active role in skill transmission.
Long abstract
This paper explores how tools within textiles shape and structure the transmission of embodied knowledge in educational institutions and makerspaces in Flanders (Belgium). Weaving, knitting, and sewing are tied to tacit and embodied practices. They rely on tools, not only as enablers of production, but also as mediators in teaching and learning.
Drawing on interviews and observations within educational contexts and makerspaces, this study examines how tools mediate the transmission of embodied textile knowledge. In both formal and informal contexts, tools shape interactions, structure learning processes, and foster knowledge exchange through their material characteristics, availability, and shared use. In this context, the selection and properties of tools reflect underlying values and actively influence how textile practices are preserved, adapted, or transformed.
The research situates tool selection within broader cultural and material frameworks, addressing questions of what knowledge is preserved, how it is transmitted, and what may be unwritten. By tracing how tools mediate as an active agent, this paper reveals some values and assumptions embedded in craft pedagogy and practice.
Ultimately, the paper argues that tools in textile production are far from neutral. They not only determine the forms of transmission but also participate in unwriting, reshaping how textile knowledge is understood, valued, and carried forward. Through this lens, the research contributes to the ongoing dialogue about how materiality and practice influence safeguarding and transmission of crafts.
Short abstract
Focusing on textile crafts in higher arts education this paper presents specific examples and exercises in the workshop, where digital tools and strategies intersect with analog drawing, manual tools and materials.
Long abstract
Focusing on textile crafts in higher arts education this paper presents specific examples and exercises in the workshop, where digital tools and strategies intersect with analog drawing, manual tools and materials.
The fundamental principles on which many textile techniques rely, have remained largely unchanged since prehistoric times. In weaving, for example, high-tech digital jacquard looms work according to the same principles that also apply to the earliest looms such as warp-weigthed looms and back-strap looms. Complex fabrics were made on these early looms - which are also still used today - but production was more labour intense and therefor slower. The main incentive for technological innovation in weaving, according to Anni Albers, was speed.
Exploring this phylogenesis of the loom and doing so hands on not only creates an embodied understanding of the technique but also helps to position yourself as a contemporary weaver within a craft and production practice which spans millennia. It is taking a slow path, were you start with unruly threads and thankfully investigate les gestes and tools handed down to you from weavers in different times and places before moving on to pixels, automated drafting software and high-tech looms.
Special attention is devoted to the exercise as a place where the discovery of something new is repeated again and again. Not only as a way to understand the complex procedures involved in the making of textiles but also as a way to carry them forward.
Short abstract
The Craeft project uses simulation and realistic visualisation to create immersive environments for craft training and design. These innovations enhance safety, conserve resources, and enable craft-specific artefact design, supporting sustainable transmission of traditional skills.
Long abstract
The Craeft project explores innovative approaches to safeguarding and transmitting traditional craft knowledge in the digital age. A key focus is the development of advanced simulation and realistic visualisation capabilities that enable the detailed rendering of craft actions. By creating immersive and interactive environments for craft education and training, Craeft facilitates the transmission of embodied knowledge while addressing critical concerns such as safety, energy conservation, and material efficiency. These simulations not only enhance training but also support craft-specific design processes, allowing designers to create artefacts that align with the constraints and possibilities of traditional crafting techniques. Additionally, Craeft's cutting-edge visualisation capabilities include realistic rendering of transparent, translucent, and shiny materials, further enriching its potential for design and review. This paper examines how such digital innovations can transform the learning, practice, and design of traditional crafts, contributing to durable and future-proof strategies for preserving cultural heritage in the context of emerging technologies.
Short abstract
When artisans retire, they leave no means of preserving their expertise to intricate extend. By using immersive technologies, it aims to safeguard techniques and enhance learning through virtual guides, making complex skills accessible and also engaging for younger generations.
Long abstract
The goal of experimentation with immersive technologies within traditional crafts is twofold. Firstly, individual manual operations are a key element of crafts. These are very specific to each artisan. Therefore at the end of a craftsperson’s career, their knowledge, if not guarded in some way, is lost. Immersive technologies could support the safeguarding of the highly personal developed skills of craftspeople. Providing some sort of technique library or instructional assistance throughout different applications. Secondly, learning crafts is a long-term commitment. New apprentices might struggle with the complexity and spatial understanding of certain explanations given by instructors. In the current space, craft experts are limited in teaching by their words, writing and recordings. Introducing virtual guides for assistance in the craft process can enhance, not only the overall learning process, but also benefit the deeper understanding of techniques and manual operations. Being involved with these immersive technologies might also attract the younger generations, giving them an engaging starting point from which to develop their skill depending on their level of interest. Wickerwork specifically is a labour-intensive craft and requires time to truly master. Not only are the hand operations important but the correct material handling is crucial. Augmented reality was used for the experiment setup through an iPad with ArUco markers that are powered by an Adobe Aero project, providing virtual overlays that are anchored real time to the reference object, which in this case was a wicker starter cross, the first step of the wicker basket making process.
Short abstract
Although usually presented as opposites, what happens if we take craft and technology seriously in the same light? This paper investigates viewing technology as craft and discusses what can happen to embodied processes when technology and craft are brought together during the act of creation.
Long abstract
The creation of crafted objects is nowadays often seen as opposite to technological processes such as computing. Where as one is embodied, material, and traditional; the other is mechanical, impersonal, and abstract. This viewpoint, however, stands in contrast to theoretical and historical links between craft and technology, where women were employed in computing positions due to their craft skills. This similarity extends to the similar processes behind crafting, especially where machinery is involved (for example, Jacquard’s loom and Babbage’s Analytical Engine).
Ethnographic data shows that some textile crafters are afraid of what technology may take away from the embodied, traditional nature of their craft. However, this paper investigates what happens when we embrace the similarities between textile crafting and technology. Further, this paper looks at what can happen when we take seriously working with technology as craft, viewing processes of coding and circuitry as crafts in their own right. This is brought together using ethnographic data collected working with people developing and using technological modifications for electronic knitting machines, weaving the traditional fabric in a new light.
Short abstract
The paper analyses the EU Regulation 2023/2411 on the protection of geographical indications for craft products and its prospective impact on the transmission of craft knowledge, providing insights into opportunities and practical difficulties craftspeople might face in formalising their craft.
Long abstract
A recent European Union Regulation (EU) 2023/2411 on the protection of geographical indications for craft products is the first EU legislative act intended to specifically protect the results of creative activity in the field of crafts. For many years, geographical indications could be protected at the EU level for agricultural products only. The Regulation now offers craftspeople the opportunity to apply for registration and protection of their geographical indications used for craft products whose characteristics are due to their geographical origin.
The paper deals with the legal framework for registration and protection of geographical indications for craft products in view of the specifics of the situation in Latvia. In this context, the paper analyses some potential geographical indications that could be applied for registration under this Regulation from Latvia and discusses opportunities and practical difficulties craftspeople might face in formalising their sometimes 'unwritten' craft and thereby transmitting their craft knowledge in this new normative context. This includes considerations, such as the preparation of a product specification by paying particular attention to raw materials and territory, production method and possibilities to introduce and use new technologies in production, and the scope of protection and the treatment of a geographical indication as a collective right.
The paper is part of the research project Tracks4Crafts (Transforming crafts knowledge for a sustainable, inclusive and economically viable heritage in Europe, 2023-2027), financed by the European Union programme Horizon Europe (Grant Agreement No. 101094507).
Short abstract
Through analyzing tapestry, fiber and textile art works done by contemporary artists and craftspeople, this paper delves into themes of embodiment and embracing or resisting modern technology to innovate crafts and sustain know-how.
Long abstract
In today's digital and AI-driven landscape, craftspeople are increasingly engaging with digital looms, 3D printing, digital knitting machines using knitting software, leveraging technologies over traditional analog methods turning artisans into part-human, part-machine entities, echoing Donna Haraway’s "Cyborg Manifesto" (1985). The increasing availability and popularity of digital tools have inspired artists like Kustaa Saksi, Hussein Shikha and Faig Ahmed to create tapestries using digital technologies. However, others advocate for other approaches, preferring to hold onto hand-made and analog practices, either partially or entirely such as fiber artists Bram van Breda, Sonya Clark, Rowlands Ricketts and Diedrick Brackens. This paper argues that what appears to be completely devoid of digital elements often has some digital aspects tucked away, and vice versa. This interplay makes textile and fiber art incredibly hybrid and packed with surprising narratives that reveal the full integration of digital tools within analog craft practices. This paper explores and analyses digital and semi-digital crafts people’s work and tools they employ. It also investigates how a digitally dominated world fosters alternative methods of resistance and counternarratives. Through analyzing tapestry, fiber and textile art works done by contemporary artists and craftspeople, this paper delves into themes of embodiment and embracing or resisting modern technology to innovate crafts and sustain know-how.
Short abstract
In this paper, we will present ethnographic research, filming and identifying traditional crafts as intangible cultural heritage. This article focuses on research on the transfer of craft knowledge and skills in the context of major economic changes and migrations in Vojvodina, Serbia.
Long abstract
The paper will present research on strategies for using traditional craft knowledge and local ecosystem resources in the context of major economic changes and migrations, which have led many people to change their occupations in order to find new sources of income in crisis situations. The decline of industry and the closure of large industrial plants and factories forced many people to return to crafts or to learn crafts and skills that were previously practiced by members of their families or people in their community, adapting techniques, tools and machines to new needs and conditions. Migrations led to the acceptance of new knowledge and exchange of experiences in the process of intercultural communication, while adapting to the resources of the natural environment.
Work on identifying and researching traditional crafts of different ethnic groups and communities will be presented, which resulted in the inscription of several elements into the National Register of Intangible Cultural Heritage of Serbia. We will present the visual ethnographic approach to the transfer of craft knowledge and skills and discuss the role of film and the filming process itself in the production and transfer of knowledge. Finally, we will look at the effects of this segment of the museum's work and the impact of this approach on communities. Active work on the registration of an element involves obtaining the status of a relevant organization for the safeguarding of that element, as well as taking on the role of monitoring future transformations.
Short abstract
What can safe-guarding of crafts mean in the context of post-disciplinary hybrid art-craft-design practices today? And how can safe-guarding of craft become a ‘futuring’ practice, aimed at producing a just and sustainable future for the planet and its inhabitants, both human and more-than-human?
Long abstract
In the latest Venice Biennale, the Golden Lion was awarded to Mataaho Collective, a New Zealand based collective of female crafters. In their installation Takapau, traditional craft weaving techniques and the accompanying meanings and metaphors form the basis for a spatial intervention that speaks to the global art world. The curated exhibition of the biennale, Stranieri Ovunque – Foreigners Everywhere was an invitation to local communities from all over the world and especially the global south, but equally brought in foreign, hybrid, or, in the words of craft theorist Julia Bryan-Wilson ‘strange bedfellows’, such as craft, to one of the most important international fora for contemporary art. The ubiquity of indigenous art and craft practices, was visible not only in Venice but is pervading the global art world as it has been pervading the world of critical and artistic design since the nineties.
Or perhaps craft has always been present as a neighboring, rather than a ‘foreign’ practice, and it is just we -as modernist, western-based art, craft, design critics or theorists- who have not been paying attention. In this sense craft can be seen as one of many ghosts of modernity that keep resurfacing, and which, thanks to the growing ubiquity of technology, are even proliferating. What can safe-guarding of crafts mean in the context of these hybrid art-craft-design practices today? And how can safe-guarding of craft become a ‘futuring’ practice, aimed at producing a just and sustainable future for the planet and its inhabitants, both human and more-than-human?
Short abstract
In this Roundtable panellists will explore and address the question of what emerging technologies mean for craftspeople transmitting & safeguarding crafts.
Long abstract
Emerging technologies are creating new opportunities for both the practice and transmission of crafts. 3D printing, CNC machines and design software are becoming increasingly embedded in production processes and working methods, video techniques, virtual and augmented reality and immersive technologies are opening up new ways to transmit hands-on skills and traditional craft knowledge.
At the same time, there are important caveats. From a historical perspective, these developments echo earlier developments when craft knowledge was abstracted and codified through writing and the proliferation of the printing press. Current technological developments may be seen as a new phase in the longstanding tension with embodied knowledge and place-based learning.
In this Roundtable panellists will explore and address the question of what these changes mean for craftspeople for safeguarding crafts.