Click the star to add/remove an item to/from your individual schedule.
You need to be logged in to avail of this functionality.
Log in
- Convenors:
-
Antti Lindfors
(University of Helsinki)
Ian Brodie (Cape Breton University)
Kristinn Schram (University of Iceland)
Send message to Convenors
- Formats:
- Panel
- Stream:
- Narratives
- Sessions:
- Monday 21 June, -
Time zone: Europe/Helsinki
Short Abstract:
This panel explores the ambivalent, awkward, and transgressive aspects of humor and comedy as employed to mark, cross, reinforce, and transgress social and cultural norms. We welcome papers that discuss both verbal and visual forms of humor, as well as the production and consumption of comedy.
Long Abstract:
Succinctly designated by Lauren Berlant and Sianne Ngai (2017) as "a pleasure spectacle of form's self-violation", capable of both producing and dispelling anxiety, humor and comedy are fundamentally ambivalent modes of cultural expression. As such, they are characteristically uncontained and uncontainable within genres, products, and forms of communication, their effects and affects potentially leaking over every conceivable border. In increasingly effacing the boundaries between political discourse and (political) satire with often unexpected and sometimes dangerous results, for instance, such ambivalence has been argued as lying at the heart of the "unprecedented political potential of humor in the early twenty-first century" (Petrovic 2018, 203).
This panel explores the ambivalent, awkward, and transgressive aspects of humor and comedy. Whether related to stand-up comedy as personal disclosure on a public arena that often purposefully breaks the quotidian social contract of what comprises civil talk, or awkwardness as a comedy trope that bends and suspends all rules of social conduct for maximally (un)pleasant affective response, or simply an upending of the audience's expectations of genre, we are interested in humor and comedy as the simultaneous marking, crossing, reinforcing, and transgressing of social and cultural norms.
We welcome papers that discuss both verbal and visual forms of humor, as well as the production and consumption of comedy.
REFERENCES
Berlant, Lauren, and Sianne Ngai 2017. Comedy Has Issues. Critical Inquiry 43:
233-249.
Petrovic, Tanja. 2018. Political Parody and the Politics of Ambivalence. Annual Review of Anthropology 47:201-16.
Accepted papers:
Session 1 Monday 21 June, 2021, -Paper short abstract:
On and offstage, stand-up comedians will defend their offensive material by reaffirming the “role” of the comedian as inveterate truthteller, permitted to leave no topic unexplored. In dialogue with a stand-up comedy artworld, this comprises an effort to define both comedy and the comedian.
Paper long abstract:
Building on the tacit assumption that the “role” of the stand-up comedian is in part to be an inveterate truthteller, and as such has tacit permission to leave no topic unexplored, comedians who have been called to account for offensive material have taken the opportunity to reaffirm this role, in turn attempting to define both comedy and the comedian. This occurs both on and offstage: that is to say, in fora where the comedian is in a ludically-framed imbalanced dialogue with a co-present audience where the primary demonstration of cognitive and aesthetic appreciation is laughter, and those where laughter is not the primary objective and the relationship with the audience is notably different. Critics from within and without the stand-up comedy artworld engage in similar and complementary discussions, in turn invoking and (re)shaping these definitions. Finally, transgressions may not be onstage verbal performances but offstage real-world actions which, in turn, can become partly accounted for through direct or indirect allusion to the character of “stand-up comedian.” This paper is an early effort to frame the issue of “going too far” within both the vernacular and academic literatures on comedy and taboo.
Paper short abstract:
The paper aims to analyse one particular, puzzling, humorous anecdote of a "rape", an intercourse between a Soviet soldier and a Hungarian woman as told by an old lady at a family gathering. I wish to contextualize this one story in the wider context of local narratives of war and sexual violence.
Paper long abstract:
The paper aims to present, contextualize and interpret a humorous rape story collected as part of an ethnographic research that was conducted in the Aranyosvidék region of Transylvania, Romania. I wish to present an understanding of this field experience and narrative event, when a similar story was told by a woman at a family gathering and provoked laughter. When one researches military stories they often encounter stories of sexual violence committed by the invading or liberating Soviet forces. These stories - mostly told by elderly women in private, after long conversations - echo biased, uneven gender relations and lack of agency: women are passive actors, hidden by men from the armed forces of the enemy just as the other valuables of the family. According to the narratives, most of the rapes occurred as consequence of women trying to act on their own accord. Yet, these stories are never linked to the storyteller or her family, only to other unnamed locals or neighbours. It seems, that actual events cannot be communicated, the traumatic experience is depersonalized and integrated as an element to the collective, victimized self-image of the local Hungarian minority. This is the general narrative, thematic context in which this shocking story was told. Through contrasting this one particular story with the block of mainstream narratives I argue that these two models of speech, the depersonalized, traumatic, dialogical and the personal, humorous, public ones echo the same sexual imaginary and gender relations narrated in relation to events of war.
Paper short abstract:
In my ongoing dissertation project I am investigating how Swedish stand-up comedians and their audiences both challenge and recreate cultural notions and norms. This paper will focus on how stand-up comedians reason about how to joke about various sensitive subjects.
Paper long abstract:
Stand-up comedy has become increasingly popular in Sweden in the last decades. The jokes of stand-up comedians reflect prevailing cultural notions and norms. But stand-up comedy can also be seen as a form of cultural free zone where one is allowed to express oneself in ways that are not possible in other public contexts. According to humor scholar Joanne R. Gilbert, stand-up comedy is a forum where hierarchies can be turned upside down, power relations are overthrown and social critique can be disguised as entertainment (2004: xii).
In my paper I will present my ongoing dissertation project investigating how Swedish stand-up comedians and their audiences challenge and recreate cultural notions and norms. By applying an intersectional perspective, I analyze how various power structures interacts and strengthens each other, but also are undermined, through humor. The main empirical material consists of observations at different stand-up comedy clubs, interviews with stand-up comedians and interviews with focus groups involving people who have been in the audience at stand-up comedy clubs.
The paper will focus on how stand-up comedians reason about how to joke about various sensitive subjects. How does this relate to cultural notions and norms? How do they mean that their performances are affected by their background and experiences?
REFERENCES
Gilbert, Joanne R. (2004). Performing marginality: humor, gender, and cultural critique. Detroit, Mich.: Wayne State University Press.
Paper short abstract:
This paper discusses the breaking and bending of civil discourse that ´disaster humour’ allows, its uses and abuses in negotiating morality and making sense of unprecedented experiences within everyday life brought on by global events such as the COVID-19 pandemic.
Paper long abstract:
From its initial, localised emergence to its full-blown global disruption of social and cultural norms the COVID-19 pandemic was met with a barrage of humorous public response. From internet memes to workplace jokes, a varyingly ambivalent and transgressive gallows-humour emerged across the spectrum of oral and digital folklore. Humour in times of calamity has long been a subject of folkloric research. Whether springing from natural or man-made disasters, terrorism or economic catastrophes, folklorists have studied the practice of humour in exoticizing and othering victims, to mediating disparate views and processing overwhelming emotions as well as analysing the role of media in its expression and distribution. In discussion with these approaches this paper focuses its attention on the breaking and bending of civil discourse that calamity allows. It asks how narratives and visual folklore encompass negotiations of morality and prudence in collective action. The paper questions the uses and abuses of humour in social media in making sense of unprecedented everyday experiences and reacting to discursive shifts, or rather tremors, brought on by global events such as the COVID-19 pandemic. It also discusses challenges and possible innovations in collecting and researching online expressions of humour in times of calamity.