Click the star to add/remove an item to/from your individual schedule.
You need to be logged in to avail of this functionality.
Log in
- Convenors:
-
Raul Acosta Garcia
(Goethe Universität Frankfurt am Main)
Jeannine-Madeleine Fischer (University of Konstanz)
Send message to Convenors
- Formats:
- Panel
- Stream:
- Bodies, Affects, Senses, Emotions
- Sessions:
- Monday 21 June, -
Time zone: Europe/Helsinki
Short Abstract:
The act of protesting by rule-breaking in public is legitimised by the bodies of those doing so. In this panel, we will discuss ethnographically informed investigations into the aesthetic qualities of collective performances that enhance the significance of protesting social assemblies.
Long Abstract:
When people decide to purposely and blatantly break rules and norms to draw attention to problems and demand changes, their bodies become not merely a part of the message but also its legitimating force. Drawing on Butler, we consider protests as bodies acting together to call into question reigning notions of the political. Our focus on the aesthetic qualities of such processes seeks to shed light on the embodied cues that provide significance to protesting social assemblies. We are interested in rule-breaking as public and collective performance, and its manner of enhancing empathic socialities. We seek ethnographically informed investigations into the bodily practices of activists in protest. Our discussions will be guided, although not limited, by the following questions: what affects and atmospheres are created by aesthetical qualities in protesting performances? Do efforts to appropriate symbols and practices from opposing movements confuse activists and their followers? Are new forms of normativity, about what is accepted and not, emerging among rule-breaking activists? We are also interested in the manner in which such bodily elements travel in digital media, especially considering the increasing importance of screens in our Covid19 pandemic times. While some protests stress movement of bodies through public spaces, others focus on stillness, like sit-ins. Are there other constellations in which symbols, logos, and materialities interplay with multisensory experiences of those protesting as well as direct and intermediated witnesses? We welcome contributions that present fresh empirical material, reflections on methodical approaches and analytical considerations on the topic.
Accepted papers:
Session 1 Monday 21 June, 2021, -Paper short abstract:
Protestors often perform their demonstrations within the framework of cultural narratives of knights and nobility, adopting shields as a projection of the individual’s identity. These devices bear the symbols that embody their ideology, even as they are used to protect their body from harm.
Paper long abstract:
In recent years, there has been a notable increase in citizen militia groups staging demonstrations and protests along ideological lines. Whether they are raging against the establishment in power, a perceived threat to their identity, biased police brutality, or an infringement upon what they see as their rights, these protestors often perform their demonstrations within the framework of cultural narratives of knights and nobility. Taking up shields and sometimes pieces of armor, they express a romanticized view of their struggle, warring against an inherently evil adversary. The shields are sometimes purchased, but just as often constructed. This presentation will explore the sources that these individuals draw from for their shield designs and training in their usage. Do the shapes of the shields carry a perceived meaning? How much is form and how much is function? What kind of background do the people who taught them to make these shields have and how has that reflected on their usage? In an era of Twitter and Instagram, how do so many learn to form a shield wall in the city streets? The shield is often a projection of the individual’s identity, bearing the symbols that embody their ideology, even as it is used to protect their body from harm.
Paper short abstract:
This paper puts forth an understanding of Colombian tropel as a bodily practice that beyond its form as a violent encounter and based on a performative understanding of it allows us to recognise its subversive potential stimulating reflection processes, questioning capitalism and power structures.
Paper long abstract:
Although violent encounters between hooded persons [the encapuchados] and Colombian police forces are a recurrent phenomenon, there are only few scholars that engage with the analysis of those confrontations commonly referred to as “tropeles”. At the National University of Colombia (UNAL) a particular kind, named organised tropeles, can be observed and call on critical social movement research to reflect on it in performative terms.
Based on ethnographic research conducted on the campus of the UNAL this paper shows that the tropel, understood as a performative ritual, allows us to gain an understanding of its deeper meaning beyond its surface understanding and common portrayal as a violent act.
With regard to the conceptions of body and spatiality it is argued that through tropeles the encapuchados call into question the social order. Through their practice, they are challenging manifestations of global capitalism and the Colombian state by making their bodies a site for the inscription and production of culture. Moreover, they temporarily transform the public space into an area of contention that redefines the occupation of space(s) understood as representative of the social order. It is discussed that these collective performances enacted by young militants have a community-building effect on the students of the university. The paper will show that these practices bear a subversive potential, which can challenge existing power structures, stimulate reflection processes, and initiate transformation. With this, the paper aims to present a new perspective on the tropeles in Colombia, currently absent from the recent discourse regarding this practice.
Paper short abstract:
Under the sparks of fire dressed up as devil, women defend their place in folklore somehow at the risk of reproducing gender stereotypes. Likewise, on their disguise many of them, exploiting their public visibility and breaking the rules, wear symbols to claim for political and gender rights.
Paper long abstract:
Lately, fervor for traditional local festivals has
increased in Catalonia, specially devils and fire animals attract crowds
of people of all ages, who take to the streets to participate with
devotion in correfocs. A correfoc (literally “run fire”) is a festive
street event in which participants parade under the sparks of fireworks
borne by devils and other fantastic figures, emulating hell.
In a city of the conurbation of Barcelona, 40 years ago the willingness
of a few women to join a group of “run fire” and their impossibility to
do so led them to create their own female-only group. Its very existence
is a claim to women’s courage. The more so because in their parades they
stage the struggle between good and evil, yet they themselves somehow
represent evil, at a symbolic level, since women represent the evil
side, at the risk of reproducing gender stereotypes. What’s more, in a
night party context, they might be exposed to all sort of experiences,
reducing the risk thanks to sorority.
The paper presents the results of an ethnography carried out with this
group during 2019 on the framework of CHIEF (Cultural Heritage and
Identities of Europe’s Future) a HORIZON2020’s project. It analyses how
in the context of popular culture, these women legitimate an activity
aimed only at men and how taking advantage of their public visibility
and popularity, they use their costumes to claim for their political and
gender rights, breaking the established rules.