Click the star to add/remove an item to/from your individual schedule.
You need to be logged in to avail of this functionality.
Log in
- Convenors:
-
Matilda Marshall
(Umeå University)
Liia-Maria Raippalinna (University of Jyväskylä)
Andreas Backa (Society of Swedish Literature in Finland, Åbo Akademi University)
Send message to Convenors
- Discussant:
-
Cristina Romanelli
(NOVA University Lisbon)
- Formats:
- Panel Roundtable
- Stream:
- Food
- Sessions:
- Thursday 24 June, -
Time zone: Europe/Helsinki
Short Abstract:
The pursuit of sustainable foodways questions our eating habits, and the way we produce and communicate food. It involves the breaking of old rules, making of new ones, and bending of both. What kind of transgressions are, and are not, made when seeking more sustainable foodways?
Long Abstract:
The pursuit of a sustainable future involves the breaking of old rules, making of new ones, and bending of both. What kind of transgressions are, and are not, made when seeking more sustainable foodways?
The current food system is increasingly framed as ecologically unsustainable, requiring major changes in production and consumption practices. Some foods are constructed as threatening while others are presented as 'ethical', 'green', 'climate-friendly', 'carbon-low' etc. Calls for altering foodways question both what and how we eat, and how we produce and communicate food. At the same time, they may challenge norms and relations relating to e.g. economy, gender or national identity.
Meanwhile, food and eating habits are often perceived as inert; changing them may seem impossible. In the Nordic countries for instance, the first tomatoes and pizzas were met with skepticism before eventually incorporated into everyday food culture. What consequences does this inertness have for (transforming) norms around food and eating? How are attempts of norm-breaking facilitated, and on the other hand, opposed?
This panel and subsequent roundtable focus on norm making and norm breaking (practices) relating to food consumption and sustainability (in a broad sense). We welcome empirical and theoretical contributions exploring transgressions and contestations around food norms/rules in different parts of the food chain. In the roundtable, we encourage discussion on, if and how ethnologists can produce practically usable knowledge and participate in the pursuit of sustainable foodways. Please indicate in your proposal if you wish to participate with a paper and/or in the roundtable.
Accepted papers:
Session 1 Thursday 24 June, 2021, -Paper short abstract:
Reducing consumption of resource intensive produces, takes on an important piece for sustainability.Often communication approaches are caught up in frames of duality, despite overall synergies.This paper assesses common grounds for sustainability communication based on a transdisciplinary setting.
Paper long abstract:
Communication is an essential part to bare sustainable system change. It reduces information asymmetry and sets the basis for the societal acceptance of lifestyle changes. Reducing consumption, especially the consumption of resource intensive produces, like meat, takes on an important piece for the sustainability puzzle. Often communication approaches are caught up in frames of duality of ‘bad and good’ and despite overall existing synergies. Little effort has been taken to systematically assess aspects of sustainability communication, which may provide a wider common ground for a less resource intensive consumption, preparing society for upcoming lifestyle changes.
We aim at 1) multiple stakeholder’s perspectives related to communication approaches for ‘less, but better’ meat 2) integrate those perspectives in a transdisciplinary creative way to gain a better understanding for synergetic communication pathways.
We draw from inter- und transdisciplinary observations, semi-structured interviews and group discussions with artists, producers, NGOs, consumer rights organizations and open up the discussion about how and what to communicate in regard to sustainable food qualities.
Paper short abstract:
My paper discusses food waste reduction as a process reconstructing and reconstituting the traditional and deep-rooted norm of not wasting food. While the reconstruction process involves braking some contradicting norms, traditions, and practices others seem unattainable.
Paper long abstract:
In recent years, food waste and food loss have been raised up as threatening global environment and food safety. Food waste reduction has become a political goal and a cultural quest shared by various actors. Food waste reduction implies several elements of norm braking, bending and construction, which I will discuss based on my study on Finnish media discourse and consumer participation in food waste reduction.
The recent discourse brought into the daylight the continuous braking of the deep-rooted traditional norm of not wasting food. My paper discusses food waste reduction as a process reconstructing and reconstituting this traditional norm. On one hand, food waste reduction appears as part of a wider transformation required in (food) production and consumption. On the other hand, its typical focus on individual behavior may also mask the need for a more profound change and braking of norms and traditions.
In the everyday lives of citizens, food waste reduction plays out as resistance to “consumer culture”. Resistance, however, does not easily turn into the transformation of alleged social and economic drivers of over-consumption as this kind of change is often regarded implausible and outside the reach of ordinary citizens. Nevertheless, taking on responsibility as consumers — thus performing the reconstitution of the sociocultural norm of not wasting food — entails hopes for wider cultural and systemic change, such as loosening the norms dictated by market economy.
Paper short abstract:
The present research addresses the conflict areas that hinder a full understanding of what has been achieved in ecological production, and that hence hinders trust in the quality of ecological foods from an interdisciplinary, cultural anthropology, didactic, societal and market-oriented perspective.
Paper long abstract:
Organic foods are produced in a manner of mindful resource conservation and environmental protection. Yet even though such foods guarantee many sustainable food properties and truly are of extrinsic sustainable quality (ever mindful that continuous setting of controls is needed), consumers surprisingly show in their purchase decision very little explicit awareness of this quality– a quality which would, if fully grasped, have to habitualize decision making in favor of this choice when shopping for food. The present research addresses the conflict areas that hinder a full understanding of what has been achieved in sustainable, ecological production, and that hence hinders trust in the production chain of ecological foods from an interdisciplinary, cultural anthropology, didactic, societal and market-oriented perspective. Grounded in qualitative empirical interviews, the research assesses the perception of ecological production along the production chain, such as e.g., regional origin, and identify where gaps of information appear and extant expectations are not met. Knowledge and trust components voiced by consumers, processors, and producers, as well as visuals circulating about this production sector will be researched and analyzed under the umbrella concept of “authenticity perception” – a now frequently used term in sustainable food production that in itself will be differentiated and semantically filled in the course of the research.
Paper short abstract:
Using as a case study one Community Supported Agriculture from Romania I am looking at how small producers, who are otherwise excluded from obtaining the premium prices of organic food markets, can still seize community economic rent through the close relationship created with their consumers.
Paper long abstract:
The rising concerns regarding food safety, and the growing awareness of the environmental impact on biodiversity through the use of harmful chemicals by intensive agriculture as well as the negative social impact for local communities, has resulted in an increasing demand for products grown through more environmental and ethical practices. Thus, the quality turn (Goodman, 2003) resulted in the rising popularity of organic certificated products. Yet, it can be argued that organic labels do not manage to challenge the unjust practices but merely create another niche in the market to be co-opted and exploited by corporations, without delivering significant changes to the food system.
Using as a case study one Community Supported Agriculture (CSA) from Romania I am looking at how small producers, who are otherwise excluded from accessing the premium prices of organic food markets, can still seize community economic rent (Galt, 2013) through the close relationship created with their consumers as part of a CSA. Using a qualitative research methodology, based on semi-structured interviews and secondary data analysis my research addresses the discursive constructions regarding food, which is perceived as good based on the virtue of trust, build through the close relationship between consumers and producers. The constructed imaginaries of food revolve around the place of origin (authenticity) or on the way it is produced (naturalness).
Paper short abstract:
The democratization of the food system calls for participation of people. Community-supported agriculture provides a way to become an active participant of the food system: a food citizen. Via participatory action research, we develop an understanding of food citizenship and its performative nature.
Paper long abstract:
Food democracy can be a way to secure the right of all people to sufficient, safe, and sustainable food and to redistribute the power within the food system. The democratization of the food system calls for active participation and the empowerment of citizens. Alternative food networks, such as community-supported agriculture (CSA), provide ways of producing and consuming food differently. They involve citizens in community decision-making and collective action in everyday food practices. CSA is a concrete way through which food democracy can be pursued and new norms regarding food consumption and production may be created.
Our conceptual framework builds on a performative conception of citizenship: Instead of status, citizenship is seen as becoming in action. This understanding of citizenship appreciates human–non-human entanglements, and moves beyond society-nature dualism as well as privileging of the human over the non-humans. Although much has been written on food democracy and food citizenship, the figure of food citizen is still vague. Especially the role of materiality and non-humans in constructing food citizenship requires more attention.
Via participatory action research with a small-scale CSA located in Central Finland, we develop the understanding of food citizenship: How food citizenship is produced in the CSA practices, and how materiality is affecting on becoming a food citizen and the norms related to food production and consumption? Our findings indicate that acknowledging materiality broadens the discussion from individual, market-based, and consumer-oriented approaches of participation towards norm-breaking, collective, and activist participation and the role of citizens in the food system.