Send message to Authors

Paper short abstract

Based on the empirical observation that selfies cannot be sufficiently understood in the theoretical framework of the digital self, it is argued that protest selfies refer to a non-narcissistic dimension that helps constitute a social coexistence and something shared and common.

Paper long abstract

The focus on an alleged narcissism overlooks the diversity of socio-cultural practices associated with selfies. It is assumed that selfies primarily act as a performance tool for social relationships (partnership, friendship, family). (Schönberger 2017; Holfelder/Schönberger 2018). Because selfies are ubiquitous, so the thesis, they not only have a function for the "self", but also for social "togetherness" and for what is shared. Selfies are also used as a political tool. In this paper, selfies are analyzed as a recombinant practice of political protest. Can the selfie be seen as an extension of the possibility of political communication? While a "like" or an online petition has little binding force, selfies with names and faces represent a commitment.

If we understand selfies in the context of a process of social aestheticization (Holfelder/Schönberger 2017), then another alleged tendency, namely the aestheticization of politics, can be interpreted differently.

Holfelder/Schönberger (2017), Einführung - Bewegtfilmpraktiken und Alltagskultur(en). In: Dies. (eds.), Bewegtbilder und Alltagskultur(en). Von Super 8 über Video zum Handyfilm. Praktiken von Amateuren im Prozess der gesellschaftlichen Ästhetisierung. Köln, 9-15.

Holfelder/Schönberger (2018), "Jetzt schau doch nicht so schlecht gelaunt!". Das Urlaubsselfie. In: Verein Industriekultur und Alltagsgeschichte, Werner Koroschitz (eds.), Zimmer frei. Die Entwicklung der "Fremdenpflege" in Kärnten. Klagenfurt/Celovec, 209-214.

Schönberger (2017), "But first, LET ME TAKE A SELFIE" oder eine neue Art sich selbst zu betrachten und sich mit anderen zu unterhalten? In: Braun etal. (eds.), Kulturen der Sinne. Zugänge zur Sensualität der sozialen Welt. Münster, 37-53.