Send message to Authors

Paper short abstract:

This paper analyzes GenAI's dual effects on anthropological thinking, both limiting views and enhancing debate. It advocates for a paradigm shift from generation to augmentation, emphasizing the need for reflective cybernetic dialogue in understanding technology's impact on critical thought.

Paper long abstract:

This paper examines the dual role of technology, specifically generative artificial intelligence (GenAI), in shaping contemporary critical thinking in anthropology. It addresses the paradoxical nature of AI as both a constraint and an enabler in the development of human thought processes. On one hand, algorithm-driven platforms can limit perspective and reinforce existing beliefs, potentially leading to cognitive tunnel vision. This phenomenon is critical in understanding the challenges posed to critical thinking in an increasingly digital world.

In contrast, generative AI can also act as a tool for augmenting human thought. AI systems can provide counter-arguments, simulate debates, and expose users to diverse perspectives, thereby enriching intellectual diversity and fostering a more nuanced approach to problem-solving.

This paper advocates for a paradigm shift working with GenAI from focusing on generation to augmentation, emphasizing the need for transforming thought processes in the age of AI. It also outlines a re-humanized future of technology where cybernetic dialogue, clear communication, original, disruptive ideas, and relational thinking become paramount. This involves reevaluating the frameworks and assumptions underlying idea generation, moving towards a more reflective and critical approach. The paper concludes by highlighting the transformative potential of AI in revolutionizing intellectual engagement and urging a reevaluation of our relationship with technology in fostering intellectual growth.