Click the star to add/remove an item to/from your individual schedule.
You need to be logged in to avail of this functionality,
and to see the links to virtual rooms.
Log in
Accepted Paper:
Pedagogical power dynamics seen from the South: A case study of the Global Classroom for Democracy Innovation (GCDI)
Matthew Wingfield
(Stellenbosch University)
Mukisa Mujulizi
(Global Classroom for Democracy Innovation)
Paper short abstract:
The COVID-19 pandemic led to a widespread disruption in the composition and form of teaching and learning. Reflecting on a globally networked learning opportunity formed during this time, we track the multiplicity of ways in which a range of global power dynamics are (re)produced in these spaces.
Paper long abstract:
Critiques of the composition and impacts of global educational offerings have in recent years become animated by a range of scholars. As Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) seek to ‘internationalise’ their pedagogical offerings, often students from the ‘Global North’ and ‘Global South’ find themselves in globally diverse spaces. This became increasingly prevalent during the COVID-19 pandemic, with similarly-aligned online engagements becoming ubiquitous. This paper is based on an international ‘Global Classroom’ with students from Stellenbosch University (South Africa), University of Toronto (Canada), and University West (Sweden), and others. We argue that while prevalent global power dynamics (in various forms) embedded in internationally collaborative sessions were intentionally engaged, there are a range of dynamics that emerge on different levels that need to be navigated (Boughey & Mckenna, 2021). Our investigation, therefore, takes a multi-level approach in addressing global power dynamics. It is shown that without such an approach, engagements with power dynamics can be largely superficial, further stymying productive and inclusive student engagement. This paper is based on two years of planning and managing the Global Classroom for Democracy Innovation (GCDI) project and is further supported by both qualitative and quantitative feedback from student participants.