Click the star to add/remove an item to/from your individual schedule.
You need to be logged in to avail of this functionality,
and to see the links to virtual rooms.
Log in
- Convenors:
-
Siddharth Sareen
(University of Stavanger)
Elizabeth Chatterjee (Queen Mary University of London)
Abigail Martin (University of Sussex School of Business)
Send message to Convenors
- Stream:
- Climate Change
- Sessions:
- Friday 18 September, -
Time zone: Europe/London
Short Abstract:
Drawing on studies of energy transitions, social scientists will analyse the puzzles, perils and promises of engagement with this research stream. How do scholars in cognate disciplines navigate and legitimate the epistemic politics of scholarship given the present urgency of climate mitigation?
Long Abstract:
Increasing concern over the climate challenge, growing affordability of low-carbon energy sources, and the persisting power of incumbent fossil fuel sources in energy systems have driven an expansion of research on energy transitions during the 2010s. Studies in energy anthropology have multiplied, energy geographies has gained force as a field, and a number of cognate domains have emerged. As discernible patterns begin to take shape in these overlapping yet distinct strands of research, we turn a reflexive lens on to this solidifying mass of scholarship in relation to our analyses of energy transitions. We are interested in unpacking what functions these fields perform by asking: what are the epistemic politics of energy research assemblages? Each contribution takes a particular energy transition case as a point of departure, then critically unpacks one's own role and perspective as a researcher engaging with the case. Contributors will also consider the analytical limits and opportunities developed by scholarly fields in order to reflect on the approaches we and our scholarly communities use to acquire and advance knowledge about energy transitions in the context of climate change.
Accepted papers:
Session 1 Friday 18 September, 2020, -Paper short abstract:
This paper examines the epistemic and ontological politics of energy transitions drawing from two cases of climate policy driven energy transitions: community solar projects for environmental justice and biofuels as low-carbon transportation fuels.
Paper long abstract:
Knowledge production is a key issue in environmental governance and increasingly important to research on the governance of energy transitions. Drawing from the fields of Science and Technology Studies and environmental politics, this paper examines how energy transitions as climate mitigation strategies are constituted by the co-production of knowledge, values, and social order. The first case explores the co-production of environmental justice screening and mapping technologies with particular notions of justice and equity that have given way to community-based solar initiatives tied to environmental justice movements in the US. The second case looks at the co-production of lifecycle assessments for carbon intensity metrics and low-carbon biofuel developments in the US. Each case highlights the epistemic politics of energy transitions that are mobilized by specific claims of advancing justice and of reducing greenhouse gas emissions, respectively. In both cases, the lines between science and politics blur and are arguably embraced in the policymaking arena, suggesting new norms for the boundary drawn between science and policy. In addition, the cases highlight key differences in the participation of affected publics in the creation of new research methods. Such methods generate representations of realities to be pursued through policymaking. This brings ontological politics to the fore, raising questions about what realities are enacted by research methods, as well as how those realities reinforce or link up with other energy transition realities.
Paper short abstract:
The article identifies scalar biases in who controls and who is made responsible for socio-technical infrastructural interventions. Using comparative cases of smart meter roll-out, it contributes to energy geographies debates on democratising automation of infrastructures during energy transitions.
Paper long abstract:
Within the energy geographies debate on the uneven scalar effects of energy transitions, this article addresses the under-examined intersection of automation and energy transitions. Using a comparative case of smart meter rollouts, it draws on two contrasting studies - one with an urban living lab during Norway's near-universal smart meter rollout to three million consumers, and the other at the national scale in Portugal during its quarter completed smart meter rollout across six million consumers. It identifies twin scalar biases: (i) social aspects of automation are controlled at higher scales while users are responsibilised for them at the household scale, and (ii) both control over and responsibility for technical aspects are restricted to higher scales. The article empirically identifies how these scalar biases modulate socio-technical infrastructural interventions, such as smart meters, to render automated futures undemocratic.