Click the star to add/remove an item to/from your individual schedule.
You need to be logged in to avail of this functionality.
Log in
- Convenors:
-
Gregory Savarimuthu
(Kannur University)
Jancy Francis (Kannur University)
Send message to Convenors
- Track:
- Producing the Earth
- Location:
- University Place 3.210
- Sessions:
- Tuesday 6 August, -, -
Time zone: Europe/London
Short Abstract:
The present panel invites papers that attempt to develop appropriate parameters and identify concrete indicators to understand and assess the levels of livelihood, based on the ground-level realities, within a sustainable development framework
Long Abstract:
In the long journey of human race lasting almost a million years, the human beings have been creating and recreating multiple and diversified ways of life in the process of their continuous interaction with natural resources and ecological setting. While this interaction had been symbiotically sustained for a major span of time in human history, the last few centuries, which constitute only a fraction in the long history of mankind have severely affected this symbiosis to the extent of even threatening the very human existence itself. This has also resulted in keeping a majority of humanity at the level of a vulnerable existence. Sustainable livelihood is concerned with the capacity of the people, in making a living by surviving the shocks and stresses, and improving their material conditions without disturbing the sustainability of the livelihood options of others, either now or in future. The sustainable livelihood approach emerged as an alternative to the current unsustainable patterns of production and consumption, both in the developing and in the developed worlds.
The present panel invites papers that attempt to develop appropriate parameters and identify concrete indicators to understand and assess the levels of livelihood, based on the ground-level realities, within a sustainable development framework.
Accepted papers:
Session 1 Tuesday 6 August, 2013, -Paper short abstract:
In a world of unsustainable ways of life, sustainable livelihood and human security and development becomes a serious concern of modern society. The present paper attempts to develop appropriate parameters and identify concrete indicators to understand and assess the levels of livelihood, based on the ground-level realities, using the BCOPS levels of livelihood within a sustainable development framework.
Paper long abstract:
With an unending thirst for consumerism, unsustainable ways of life are becoming the hallmark of the modern society world over, seriously challenging the very existence of humanity. Though sustainability concern had been raised long before, the humanity is yet to rise to the occasion and make an emphatic response to save itself from the holocaust. There have been several efforts to develop appropriate indicators to understand the extent of human development across nations and states. However, it is also important that we develop appropriate indicators to understand the levels of human livelihoods which are inherently tied to the levels of human development, particularly in the context of increasing concerns about building up sustainable livelihoods for continued human security and development. The present paper which is based on a micro-level study carried out in a Kerala village, India, is an attempt to develop appropriate parameters and identify concrete indicators to understand and assess the levels of livelihood, as reflected in the ground-level realities, using the BCOPS levels of livelihood within a sustainable development framework.
Paper short abstract:
The Sugali of Anantapur District in rural Andhra Pradesh have traditionally been associated with cattle herding as accentuated by their nomadic way of life. Forced out migration, lack of natural resources in their habitat, a strong sense of self identity and a near alienation from the ambit of development policies, have forced the Sugali to take up lower-end menial jobs.
Paper long abstract:
The present paper tries to locate the contemporary discourse of livelihood among the Sugali within the broad contours of their cultural life with belief structures on one side, and the various forces of modernity on the other. By doing so, the paper tries take into account the mechanisms that enable the Sugali to bring about a plausible negotiation between the fast depleting livelihood opportunities and the deep rooted beliefs and practices that have their own ramifications when it comes to their overall socio-economic status. For this purpose the researcher makes use of life-course approach to bring to the fore the intricate mesh of inter linkages that underlie their livelihood patterns and the various factors that determine these inter linkages.
Paper short abstract:
Majority of the Anthropologists pay little attention to the policy implications of their surveys and ethnographic reports. It is high time that they should. This paper makes an attempt to bring into focus the policy implications of some case studies conducted by the author and his students of the Department of Anthropology at Vidyasagar University over a period of fifteen years.
Paper long abstract:
Majority of the Anthropologists pay little attention to the policy implications of their surveys and ethnographic reports. It is high time that they should. This paper makes an attempt to bring into focus the policy implications of some case studies conducted by the author and his students of the Department of Anthropology at Vidyasagar University over a period of fifteen years. The case studies come from a variety of situations from a single district in the Western part West Bengal. The common thread, which runs through all the case studies relates to the process of marginalization of the peasantry in the context of the development initiatives undertaken by the policy makers. The case studies reveal that industrialization, joint forest management, social forestry, building up a university, creating new opportunities of employment in an urban environment may not always lead to the empowerment of the poor let alone sustainable development. The lesson which one may learn from this endeavour is, however not a very new one. It tells us to tailor our so-called pro-people policies really participatory. We are after all as narrated by one informant riding on a difficult bullock; we must know how to control it.