Click the star to add/remove an item to/from your individual schedule.
You need to be logged in to avail of this functionality, and to see the links to virtual rooms.

T0282


Social innovation, value co-creation and the role of NGO for women empowerment and economic independence in developing economy: A case of social enterprise BRAC Aarong in Bangladesh. 
Author:
Esnaina Quader (Clemson University)
Send message to Author
Format:
Individual paper
Theme:
Equity and social inclusion

Short Abstract:

This study aims to critically review how an NGO in a developing economy deviates from traditional development means to alternative social enterprise mechanisms for enhancing their impact on women's empowerment and economic independence.

Long Abstract:

This study aims to critically review how an NGO in a developing economy deviates from traditional development means to alternative social enterprise mechanisms for enhancing their impact on women's empowerment and economic independence. In the context of NGOs, value co-creation has shifted how modern NGOs manage the organizational and development capabilities (Chmielewski et al. 2020; Dumalanede & Payaud, 2018; Kerlin 2013). Transforming from development aid providers to socially marginalized people to include them in social and economic value creation has been criticized as well as appreciated in past studies (Baser et al., 2022; Muhammad, 2018; Mair et al., 2012; Karim, 2011). Therefore, this study aims to investigate whether including marginalized groups in the value chain as a means for economic and social growth is effective by analyzing a social enterprise, BRAC Aarong, operating in Bangladesh. An in-depth analysis of the social enterprise by integrating the theoretical framework of social innovation and value co-creation has been conducted based on primary (e.g., in-depth interview) and secondary data (e.g., BRAC annual reports from 2013 to 2023). The findings of the study broadly illustrate the innovative model the NGO has developed to support under-represented women by creating demand and a market for their skills. It bridges the gap between the buyers and local rural women entrepreneurs, creating opportunities for the underprivileged to achieve a better living by enhancing their capability (Doherty et al., 2020; Mair et al., 2012; Sen, 2000). However, factors such as institutional settings (Doh & Guay, 2006), government policies (Fifka & Pobizhan, 2014), corruption and mismanagement of funds and resources internally and externally (Baser & Hasnath, 2022) create unequal platforms and disparity in how the social enterprise contributes to and facilitates the development activities. The finding also suggests that collaborative approaches with other traditional (e.g., international development agencies ) and non-traditional (e.g., multinational corporations) development agents create new avenues for development initiatives and access to resources (Ajwani et al., 2021; Ghauri, 2018; Doherty et al., 2014; Jamali et al., 2008). Moreover, the two-fold effects of the outcome of the operation of the social enterprise have proved to be beneficial to building a financially independent enterprise model for the NGO (Cho et al., 2015). Hence, the research outcome adds new dimensions to the existing literature on development policies and the intersection between social innovation and value co-creation. Moreover, the practical implication of innovative approaches showcased in the study would benefit both developed and developing countries' policy actors, practioners and NGOs.

Keywords: Social innovation, value co-creation, social enterprise, developing economy.

References

Ajwani-Ramchandani, R., Figueira, S., Torres de Oliveira, R., Jha, S., Ramchandani, A. and Schuricht, L. (2021), “Towards a circular economy for packaging waste by using new technologies: the case of large multinationals in emerging economies”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 281, p. 125139.

Baser, S., & Hasnath, S. A. (2022). The Rise and Fall of the NGOs in Bangladesh: What Does the Future Hold? In www.intechopen.com. IntechOpen. https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/84563

Cho, S. and R. Sultana (2015). “Journey from NGO to Sustainable Social Enterprise:Acceleratory Organizational Factors of BRAC”. Asian Social Work and Policy Review 9. pp. 293-306.

Chmielewski, D. A., Dembek, K., Beckett, J. R. (2020) Business Unusual: Building BoP 3.0. J Bus Ethics 161(1):211–229

Doh, J. P., & Guay, R. T. (2006). Corporate social responsibility, public policy, and NGO activism in Europe and the United States: An institutional-stakeholder perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 47–72.

Doherty B, Haugh H, Sahan E, Wills T, Croft S (2020) Creating the new economy: business models that put people and planet first. Available online at: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/155977/

Doherty, B., H. Hough and F. Lyon (2014). “Social enterprises as hybrid organizations: A review and research agenda”. International Journal of Management Reviews, 16. pp. 417-436.

Dumalanede, C., & Payaud, M. A. (2018). Reaching the bottom of the pyramid with a social enterprise model: The case of the NGO Entrepreneurs du Monde and its social enterprise Nafa Naana in Burkina Faso. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 37, 6, 30–39.

Fifka, M. S., & Pobizhan, M. (2014). An institutional approach to corporate social responsibility in Russia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 82, 1, 192–201.

Ghauri, P.N. (2018). Multinational Enterprises and Sustainable Development in Emerging Markets. In: Bergé, JS., Harnay, S., Mayrhofer, U., Obadia, L. (eds) Global Phenomena and Social Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60180-9_2

Jamali, D., Safieddine, A. M., & Rabbath, M. (2008). Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility Synergies and Interrelationships. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16(5), 443–459. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2008.00702.x

Kerlin, J. A. (2013). Defining Social Enterprise Across Different Contexts: A Conceptual Framework Based on Institutional Factors, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 42(1): 84–108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764011433040

MAIR, J., MARTÍ, I., & VENTRESCA, M. J. (2012). BUILDING INCLUSIVE MARKETS IN RURAL BANGLADESH: HOW INTERMEDIARIES WORK INSTITUTIONAL VOIDS. The Academy of Management Journal, 55(4), 819–850. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23317616

MUHAMMAD, Anu, "Rise of the Corporate NGO in Bangladesh,"Economic and Political Weekly 53, no. 39 (September 2018): 45-52

Hossain, N., & Sengupta, A. (2009, July 5). Thinking Big, Going Global: The Challenge of BRAC’s Global Expansion. Papers.ssrn.com. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1879104

Karim, L. (2011). The Structural Transformation of the NGO Sphere. University of Minnesota Press EBooks, 1–34. https://doi.org/10.5749/minnesota/9780816670949.003.0001

Mair, J., & Marti, I. (2007). Entrepreneurship for social impact: encouraging market access in rural Bangladesh. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 7(4), 493–501. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720700710820579

Pacesila, M., & Colesca, S. E. (2020). Insights on social responsibility of NGOS. Systemic Practice and Action Research. DOI: 10.1007/s11213-020-09520-1

Sen, A. (2000). Development as freedom. New Delhi: Oxford University Press