Short Abstract:

This presentation shares the development and execution of a dynamic helical model of the Capability Approach. The Model was developed to create a pedagogical framework that addresses the development of Higher Education curricula and student experiences in Western liberal economies. Participants gain access to the practical and accessible framework, templates, and published student works.

Long Abstract:

Proposal

In this presentation, participants learn to use a helical model of the Capability Approach (CA) as a normative pedagogical framework in Higher Education (HE).

The presentation begins with the foundational pedagogical structure of learning to be, learning to know, learning to live together, and learning to do (Delors, Mufti, Amagi, Carneiro, Chung & Geremek, 1996). The structure is a dynamic helix strengthening each iteration and encircles a sampling of wicked problems (Head & Alford, 2015). Next, participants see the integration of the framework for university courses, a nationally-funded campus-wide sustainability project, and for experiential learning activities for student researchers. The presentation demonstrates a CA model that identifies the "connections between people, their social relations, and their social embedment" (Robeyns, 2017).

Developing a Pedagogical Framework Development in the Age of Outcomes-Based Education

Governments in Western liberal economies envision funding for HE based on human capital theory (Wheelahan, 2019). To enact the strategy, governments use learning outcomes for "quality assurance, to modernize curriculum for societal interests, and to apply government and market influence upon the curriculum" (Brunet, 2022a; Ministry of Colleges and Universities, n.d.). In the 1960s, understanding HE in terms of human capital theory was descriptive. In the 1980s, human capital theory rationales for HE were normative. In the 2000s, governments viewed human capital theory as a prescriptive strategy for HE (Naidoo, 2003; Wheelahan, 2011). Simultaneously, there was also a shift in influential economies such as the United States, where the US Budget went from a significant focus on funding public goods at a scale of 75% in the 60s to 25% today (Carney, 2021). The models are increasingly individualistic.

This paper demonstrates how a helical model for the CA addresses the pedagogical challenges created by human capital theory in HE. Additionally, the model integrates the CA to address Equity, Diversity, Inclusion and Indigeneity, sustainability (financial, environmental, and generational) and recognition of the anthropocene (Boni & Walker, 2013, Nussbaum 2023). For example, the helical model at the second stage of development shifts to ontology, knowledge economy, network theory, and reflective practice. The third iteration of the model examines habitus, ecology of epistemologies, Ubuntu/Rangatira, and the examined life (Battiste, 2002; Bruns; Brunet 2023; Delors, Mufti, Amagi, Carneiro, Chung, & Geremek, 1996; Gade, 2011; Hart, 2012, 2019; Kolb & Kolb, 2017; Nicholson, Spiller & Pio, 2019; Peters, 2004, 2010; Nussbaum, 2010, 2011, 2019, 2023; Sen, 2001, 2007; Shiva, 2019; Slaughter, 2014; Susskind & Susskind, 2015; United Nations Development Programme, 2020; Walker, 2008, 2015, 2024; Walker & McLean, 2013; Vaugh & Walker, 2012; Unterhalter, 2020; Wheelahan, 2012). After the model is shared, the presentation contextualizes its application for university courses, a campus-wide project about sustainability, and undergraduate research student curriculum.

University Courses

In 2015, the author restructured special topics courses centred upon project management activities for liberal arts students. One course iteration supported a curriculum for students planning the African Diaspora Youth Conference (ADYC). The existing project had not previously provided course credit for students conducting their work. Students completed semi-structured coursework while organizing and executing the annual conference. Students learned about human rights through Nussbaum's Central Capabilities in the course. In another iteration, students learned about the housing crisis from subject matter experts and local politicians (Brunet, 2022b). In the course, students situated themselves through a LinkedIn assignment to explore their positionality and connect with peers (learning to be and learning to live together). Next, students learned about the CA through course readings (Alkire & Deneulin, 2009; Nussbaum, 2011), attending the online HDCA conference, and volunteering personal experiences to facilitate a multi-dimensional understanding of the human experience. Students also created structured reflections mapping their experiences on the terms of the helical model of the CA (learning to be, learning to know, learning to live together, and learning to do).

The developed strategy became part of a successful application for the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada Connections (SSHRC) grant titled UWill Discover Sustainable Futures Project.

UWill Discover Sustainable Futures Project

In 2023, the author was awarded funding from the institution's Office of Vice President of Research and Innovation and the SSHRC of Canada to launch a year-long project where students learned about sustainable futures. A central piece of the proposal was the infrastructure used for training (based on the CA) and the United Nations Sustainability Development Goals. In learning to be, students completed an introductory speech exercise to explore their positionality and networked among their peers. In learning to know, over 200 students authored structured presentations about the 2030 United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. In learning to live together, students worked in groups to learn about leadership on the commons (Singh, Joy Thompson, and Curran, 2021). In learning to do, they created interactive pedagogical opportunities for students, organized a conference, participated in a writing retreat (Wiebe, Pratt, & Noël, 2023), and published the UWill Discover Journal. As a part of the conference, the author created structured reflections for student research assistants, enabling them to present the work they conducted with their advisors.

Experiential Learning Activities for Undergraduate Student Researchers

The University of Windsor in Ontario, Canada, created the Outstanding Scholars program for high-achieving academic students who complete six paid research placements during their undergraduate studies. Understanding the voice of student research assistants is critical in creating space for their work and their being and becoming journeys (Martinez Vargas, 2022). In learning to be, students situate themselves within research projects by completing an introductory speech assignment. In learning to know and learning to live together, students share a mind map of their connections with people, places, skills acquired, and knowledge networks. In learning to do, students share a structured reflection using Kolb's Learning Cycle (Kolb & Kolb, 2017). As part of the learning cycle exercise, students access various CA concepts to frame their experiences (Brunet, Shaban, and Gonçalves, 2020). Students decide how, where, when and if the reflections are shared.

Further Development

This session refutes offering a conclusion to decolonize outcomes-based education.

References

Alkire, S. & Deneulin, S. (2009). The Human Development and Capability Approach. In Deneulin, S., & Shahani, L. (Eds.). An introduction to the human development and capability approach: Freedom and agency. IDRC.

Battiste, M. (2002). Indigenous knowledge and pedagogy in First Nations education: A literature review with recommendations (pp. 1-69). Ottawa: National Working Group on Education.

Boni, A., & Walker, M. (Eds.). (2013). Human development and capabilities: Reimagining the university of the twenty-first century. Routledge.

Brunet, T. A. (2022a). Humanities and Learning Outcomes in Ontario Higher Education (Order No. 29212114). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global; ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global Closed Collection. (2735656690). https://ledproxy2.uwindsor.ca/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/humanities-learning-outcomes-ontario-higher/docview/2735656690/se-2

Brunet, T. (2022b). Universities and colleges want to enrol more students. But where are they supposed to live? The Conversation Canada. https://theconversation.com/universities-and-colleges-want-to-enrol-more-students-but-where-are-they-supposed-to-live-195624

Brunet, T. (2023). UWill Discover Sustainable Futures. [Conference presentation]. CSSHE, York University.

Brunet, T, Shaban, H. and Gonçalves, S. (2020). The Capability Approach: A proposed framework for experiential learning in the Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences. 2020 HDCA Conference – Online (Auckland, NZ). https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/ctlpub/7Delors, J., Mufti, I. A., Amagi, I., Carneiro, R., Chung, F., & Geremek, B. (1996). Report to UNESCO of the International Commission on Education for the Twenty-first Century. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000114766

Bruns, A. (2008). Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life, and Beyond: From production to produsage (Vol. 45). Peter Lang.

Carney, M. (2021). Values: Building a better world for all. Signal.

Delors, J., Mufti, I. A., Amagi, I., Carneiro, R., Chung, F., & Geremek, B. (1996). Report to UNESCO of the International Commission on Education for the Twenty-first Century. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000114766

Gade, C. B. (2011). The historical development of the written discourses on Ubuntu. South African Journal of Philosophy= Suid-Afrikaanse Tydskrif vir Wysbegeerte, 30(3), 303-329

Hart, C. S. (2012). Aspirations, education and social justice: Applying Sen and Bourdieu. A&C Black.

Hart, C. S. (2019). Education, inequality and social justice: A critical analysis applying the Sen-Bourdieu Analytical Framework. Policy Futures in Education, 17(5), 582-598.

Head, B. W., & Alford, J. (2015). Wicked problems: Implications for public policy and management. Administration & Society, 47(6), 711-739.

Kolb, A. and Kolb, D. (2017). Evaluating Experiential Learning—The Personal Application Assignment (PAA). Retrieve from https://learningfromexperience.com/downloads/research-library/evaluating-experiential-learning-the-personal-application-assignment.pdf

Martinez Vargas, C. (2022). Democratising Participatory Research: Pathways to Social Justice from the South. https://www.openbookpublishers.com/books/10.11647/obp.0273

Ministry of Colleges and Universities. (n.d.). College and University Strategic Mandate Agreements. Retrieved from https://www.ontario.ca/page/all-college-and-university-strategic-mandate-agreements#performance-metrics

Naidoo, R. (2003). Repositioning higher education as a global commodity: opportunities and challenges for future sociology of education work. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 24(2), 249-259.

Nicholson, A., Spiller, C., & Pio, E. (2019). Ambicultural governance: Harmonizing Indigenous and Western approaches. Journal of Management Inquiry, 28(1), 31-47

Nussbaum, M. C. (2010). Not for profit: Why democracy needs the humanities (Vol. 2). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Nussbaum, M. C. (2011). Creating capabilities. Harvard University Press.

Nussbaum, M. C. (2019). The cosmopolitan tradition. Harvard University Press.

Nussbaum, M. C. (2023). Justice for animals: our collective responsibility. Simon and Schuster.

Peters, M. (2004). Higher education, globalization and the knowledge economy. In M. Walker and J. Nixon (Eds) (2004) Reclaiming universities from a runaway world. Maidenhead: SRHE/Open University Press.

Peters, M. A. (2010). Three forms of the knowledge economy: Learning, creativity and openness. British Journal of Educational Studies, 58(1), 67-88.

Robeyns, I. (2017). Wellbeing, freedom and social justice: The capability approach re-examined. Open Book Publishers.

Sen, A. (2001). Development as freedom. Oxford Paperbacks.

Sen, A. (2007). Identity and violence: The illusion of destiny. Penguin Books India.

Shiva, V. (2019). ONENESS vs the 1%: Shattering illusions, seeding freedom. New Internationalist.

Slaughter, S. (2014). Academic capitalism in the age of globalization. JHU Press.

Susskind, R. E., & Susskind, D. (2015). The future of the professions: How technology will transform the work of human experts. Oxford University Press, USA.

UNDP (United Nations Development Programme). 2020. Human Development Report 2020: The Next Frontier: Human Development and the Anthropocene. New York.

Unterhalter, E. (Ed.). (2020). Measuring the unmeasurable in education. Routledge.

Walker, M. (2008). A human capabilities framework for evaluating student learning. Teaching in higher education, 13(4), 477-487.

Walker, M. (2015). Advancing student well-being and agency: outline of a 'capabilities-friendly' approach. South African journal of higher education, 29(5), 279-296. https://journals.co.za/doi/pdf/10.10520/EJC182505

Walker, M. (2024). Repair in Education Spaces. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 1-20.

Walker, M., & McLean, M. (2013). Professional education, capabilities and the public good: The role of universities in promoting human development. Routledge.

Wheelahan, L. (2011). Beware Anglophone countries bearing gifts. Validierung von Lernergebnisse [Recognition and validation of learning outcomes]. Bonn: BIBB, 63-86

Wheelahan, L. (2012). Why knowledge matters in curriculum: A social realist argument. Routledge.

Wheelahan, L. (2019). Competence and Vocational Education. In David Guile and Lorna Unwin (Eds), The Wiley Handbook of Vocational Education and Training, First Edition Knowledge, John Wiley & Sons. (pp. 97 – 112).

Wiebe, N. G., Pratt, H. L., & Noël, N. (2023). Writing Retreats: Creating a Community of Practice for Academics Across Disciplines. Journal of Research Administration, 54(1), 37-65.