Click the star to add/remove an item to/from your individual schedule.
You need to be logged in to avail of this functionality.
Log in
- Convenors:
-
Tobias Haller
(University of Bern)
Jean-David Gerber (University of Bern)
Send message to Convenors
- Format:
- Panels
- Location:
- RH0S1
- Start time:
- 29 June, 2017 at
Time zone: Europe/Zurich
- Session slots:
- 1
Short Abstract:
Development projects in Africa often accelerate the destruction of commons but can also lead to the creation of new ones in the form of compensation measures. This phenomenon poses a number of challenging questions concerning distribution of gains and losses within communities and between genders.
Long Abstract:
The positive connotation associated with commons is being increasingly used in mainstream development discourse. Even large-scale developers now claim to have integrated the critique against privatization and exclusion, and their projects may for example include the creation of "new commons". However it is often unclear how these new common resources are distributed within communities and between genders.
New commons leading to collective gains refer for example to common infrastructure, irrigation channels, special community funds, classrooms or dispensaries. Cases from Africa suggest that these new commons are often located in rural areas but have a close link to urban areas where the developers are located.
Although a discourse of modernity, promises of development, and compensation measures based on CSR programs are often used to smoothen this conversion, evidence shows that the process may not go without conflicts and could be called a new form of Anti-Politics Machine:
- Do large-scale investments lead to the creation of new commons and are these commons part of a "global discourse" aiming to improve the palatability of large-scale investments?
- Which institutions regulate access and uses? Who is included, who is excluded in providing and appropriating new commons? What are the different (emic) perceptions about new commons, and why do perceptions vary between actors?
- In societies characterized by a strongly gendered division of work, how are women involved in the definition of the rules regulating the new commons? Do they benefit from these new resources? Can they compensate for the lost commons?
Accepted papers:
Session 1Paper short abstract:
In Malawi and Ghana, large-scale land acquisitions for agricultural purposes led to the emergence of new commons in the form of compensation resources – infrastructure development, community funds, Fairtrade Premiums and outgrower schemes. However, access to these new common resources are structured leading to elite capture where few elites have access and the majority lose out. As such, new common resources are used as a cover-up for land exploitation in the name of rural development.
Paper long abstract:
Large-scale land acquisitions for agricultural purposes by both foreign and national investors have increased in the last decades. These investments are generally implemented through a privatisation of previously communally held land and resources. Despite their many uses and functions for local people, the commons are often described as “idle land” and thus prove to be an ideal target for foreign and local investments.
Due to increasing national and international pressure, a growing number of investors are however designing measures to compensate local people for the loss of farmland and communally held resources. These “new commons”, which take on different forms in different contexts (ranging from infrastructure development, community funds, Fairtrade Premiums to outgrower schemes) are generally supposed to benefit the community as a whole and lead to poverty reduction and development.
Looking at two large-scale land acquisitions in Malawi and Ghana, we will highlight what is lost as the “old” commons are enclosed and point out some shortcomings of the new commons that are created. We will highlight that not only do these new commons often benefit mainly privileged local elite, but they also create a number of new dependencies, which tie the local communities’ fortunes to the fortune of the investors and decrease their resiliency in the face of shocks. The cases highlights the strategic use of compensation resources as a cover-up for exploitation of local land and its related resources in the name of rural development through contract farming.
Paper short abstract:
An unbalanced deal: Large‐Scale Land Acquisition (LSLA) for forest plantations and gender in Kilolo district, Iringa Region, Tanzania
Paper long abstract:
Tanzania has been prospecting for foreign investments since the mid-1980s when it changed to a neoliberal political and economic system after nearly 20 years of Socialism. Many investors focused on biofuel projects between 2005 and 2008, many of which seem to have failed. The more recent investment undertakings' focus is on food and forestry production and impact the use of former common pool resources on the land, especially common pool resources such as water, pasture and forests for subsistence and cash. This is done in the context of village land that is legally held in common, based on the Village Land Act of 1999.
I have conducted research on LSLA for forest plantations by a British-based investor called the New Forests Company (NFC) in Kilolo district, Iringa region in 2015 and 2016. In this presentation I will focus on the impacts of the commons enclosure created by this land deal that impacts women differently than men; and especially the formers' ability to fulfill their care work as they lose access to land and related common pool resources (e.g, fruit trees) for which mostly only men are compensated. Further, I contrast these impacts to the compensation received as a new commons - which largely is perceived as insufficient because of lacking in transparency in pay-out schemes and power relations within families and villages, scarce jobs available for local people generally and extremely low for women, and development and infrastructure projects are badly adapted to local needs.
Paper short abstract:
The Ogiek are indigenous ethnic group in Kenya that has in recent times accelerated their claims to the Mau Forest Land. Yet the destruction of 'commons' such as the Mau Forest has led to gender and ethnic tensions between autochthones and the so-called "immigrant guests'.
Paper long abstract:
The competition for land between the ethnic communities has been observed in Kenya even before the coming of the British settlers. Whereas before the abundance of land and relatively low population maintained an amicable relations between the ethnic groups, currently, the rise in population and scarcity of land and landlessness has sparked ethnic tensions.
Using narratives and excerpts from my PhD fieldwork study, I carry out an analysis of how the concept and experience of being an Ogiek person in these settlement schemes has shaped day to day negotiations of rights to property and land around the Mau Forest area. Men have to assert their masculinities within the new found geographical spaces whilst women have to pool into their own resources in order to maintain their agency
Paper short abstract:
The Moroccan Agency for Sustainable Energy established the biggest Solar Project in the world, taken from communal land previously owned by an Amazigh Clan near Ouarzazate. This have led to loss of access to commons (land, water and plants) and in some cases, access is restricted due to enclosure of land.
Paper long abstract:
However, funds from the sale of the land and a fund from MASEN, labelled as, "fruits of the growth", through which all local people can access funds through local economic initiatives for their livelihood. These compensation initiatives serve as new forms of commons to the local communities in place of the loss of land (old commons). Therefore, the investment acts as a catalyst, through which the natural resources (land, water, and plants) is now transformed into new monetary resources that local actors can tap, under specific conditions, to sustain their livelihood. Pertinent, however, is the question of access (i.e., inclusion and exclusion) regulations, and equality of opportunities for meeting the different livelihood conditions previously supported by the old commons.
In this context, the paper explores the emic perspective on gains and losses to the local population because of the investment with a focus on gender relations at the household level. Specific questions to assess the case study include: How does the invested the livelihood activities of the local people and how do local people benefit from the project and its related new forms of commons? What conditions inhibit local people's from benefiting from the resultant new commons, who benefits and who loses from it? Finally, how are these new commons regulated and which regulatory institutions govern these new commons?
It also hints at how commons disappear and new commons emerge and the processes of accessing the resulting new commons as well as the unequal level of access to these new resources compared to losses in a gender relation perspective.
Paper short abstract:
Mining in Ghana has resulted in changing forms of commons. This has put at risk the livelihoods of farmers. This mining–agriculture nexus has driven the emergence of contested commons, which has increased the focus on making mining and agriculture work together.
Paper long abstract:
Gold mining occurs in the same geographic areas as agriculture. They compete for similar productive inputs, like land, water and labour. Though gold mining and agriculture co-exist and interact as vital livelihood strategies rural communities in Ghana, their interaction creates troubling imbalances. Gold mining and agriculture complement each other in terms of income and labour flows. But they also compete significantly for land and water resources. This has brought in its wake contested claims over land and water resources.
The increasing extraction of gold has encouraged the privatization of existing public property rights and use over land and created new commons in the form of compensation for rural farmers affected by large-scale mining investments. As a result, multinational mining companies have undertaken projects in the form of corporate social responsibility. But do these 'new commons' deliver as they promise? How do existing institutional structures contribute to mitigating the cost associated with contested commons?
This study provides greater understanding into the mining-agriculture nexus from the standpoint of contested commons. This is important to to ensure that the two economic activities interact in a positive and balanced manner, producing social and economic development without disrupting the livelihoods of rural people whose lives are tied to farming in Ghana.