Paper short abstract:

This paper examines the manifestation of the violent Islamist insurgencies of Boko Haram in Nigeria and Ansar al-Sunna in Mozambique in a comparative analysis. The paper highlights the governance challenges relating to successful national and regional counter-insurgency measures in both cases.

Paper long abstract:

This paper examines the manifestation of the violent Islamist insurgencies of Boko Haram in north-eastern Nigeria and Ansar al-Sunna in northern Mozambique in a comparative analysis. The thrust of the paper is that Islamist movements, driven by the ideas of jihadism, exploit conditions in weak and fragile states and expand their reach in territories affected by poor or deteriorating socio-economic conditions. In Africa, Boko Haram and Ansar al-Sunna are two striking examples. Following the introduction, the phenomena of Islamism and jihadist insurgencies in Africa are under review, after which state fragility is theorized. The focus then moves to Boko Haram and the conflict dynamics in the northeast of Nigeria, and the political conditions and related fragility in that country. From there, the emphasis shifts to Ansar al-Sunna and the conflict dynamics in northern Mozambique, focusing on the emergence and existence of the movement, and the political conditions and related fragility in the country. The paper argues that in both insurgencies under review – Nigeria and Mozambique – fragility and violent conflict fuel each other, and thus we can argue that the state fragility–conflict dynamics nexus is key in understanding the contemporary security landscapes and conflict in these two states. Finally, the paper concludes by highlighting and reflecting on six of the most striking similarities between the Boko Haram and Ansar al-Sunna insurgencies, and the governance (political and military) challenges that have thus far limited or prevented successful national and regional counter-insurgency measures in both countries.