to star items.

Accepted Contribution

Negotiating "ground truth" in the co-design of an LLM-based CRS for Parkinson's Disease  
Sylvie Grosjean (University of Ottawa) Janette Mujica (University of Ottawa) Arya Rahgozar (University of Ottawa) Diana Inkpen (University of Ottawa)

Short abstract

Drawing on the PD-TIPS.AI project, we examines how "ground truth" for an LLM-based conversational recommender system (CRS) is progressively constituted through situated sociotechnical negotiation.

Long abstract

This communication examines how "ground truth" for an AI-powered conversational recommender system (CRS) is progressively constituted through situated sociotechnical negotiation. The present study draws on the PD-TIPS.AI project, a bilingual CRS supporting self-care for people living with Parkinson's disease, and presents six co-design iterations (2019-2026) through which a self-care taxonomy shifted from a clinician-centred classification to a patient-centred structure organized around five first-person intentions.

For this presentation, we will focus on participatory design workshops (using card-sorting method and dialogue-testing) involving patients and caregivers. The qualitative analysis revealed three main areas of tension relating to classification into the taxonomy: (1) clinical symptoms versus lived experience; (2) information versus intention to act; and (3) fixed categories versus boundary zones. Drawing on Mol's body multiple, Suchman's situated action, and Bowker and Star's classification theory, we trace how each tension was translated into a revised taxonomy, which includes merged categories, renamed terms, newly created domains, and cross-cutting tags that attempt to resolve the identified friction.

Since the taxonomy must consider lived experience not just clinical categories, we treat it as "infrastructure-in-the-making". This iterative process allows for the continuous revision and adaptation of categories and metadata via an interface that facilitates the ongoing adjustment of the taxonomy. Based on this, we propose a reflexive ontology-making approach. In other words, it is a framework for designing LLM-based CRS that grounds ontology construction in lived realities, real-world situations, and multiple contexts. The taxonomy illustrates this approach, paving the way for more "care-full" and resilient LLM-based CRS.

Combined Format Open Panel CF21
Generating methods or degenerating practices? Playful prototyping with/through generative AI
  Session 2 Tuesday 8 September, 2026, -