Concurrent with the rise of "drugs for life" in biomedical societies has been a growing trend of using food as medicine. How does "eating for life" respond to and shape ideas about the body, the politics of medical knowledge, subjectivity, and the limits of the human?
In light of recent theorizing about the rise of "drugs for life" (Dumit 2012) - drugs which are necessary to sustain life and which also must be taken for the duration of life - as a dominant trend in the biomedical toolkit, everyday technologies of the self have sometimes been overlooked. Yet technologies of food consumption remain of vital importance for the allopathic management of certain diseases that remain incurable by pharmaceutical means (food allergies) and increasingly important adjuvants in others (ADHD, autism, heart disease). By contrast, dietary techniques that have captured the imagination of sufferers without receiving the imprimatur of Western biomedical science (such as those adopted from Chinese, homeopathic, or other "complementary and alternative" or "traditional" medicines) can cause controversy and conflict when patient and doctor meet. Beyond the clinic, dietary regimes centered around toxins, detoxing, cleansing, and "clean eating" offer opportunities for the reasonably healthy person to seek an elevated state of health as part of the new ideology of wellness.
Ultimately, this panel seeks to propose answers to the following questions: What are the moral, intersubjective, political, or economic effects of eating for life? What controversies arise between experts, including between biomedical experts and lay expert illness and wellness communities? What does the growing use of food as medicine mean for the authority and credibility of lab- and clinic-based biomedical knowledge? And, finally, what happens to the moral, aesthetic, and cultural connotations of (particular) foods when they are appropriated as part of a para-medical eating regimen?