Click the star to add/remove an item to/from your individual schedule.
You need to be logged in to avail of this functionality.
Log in
- Convenor:
-
Rebecca Carlson
(Toyo University)
Send message to Convenor
- Discussants:
-
Ryo Morimoto
(Princeton University)
Marije Miedema (Rijksuniversiteit Groningen)
Stephanie Ketterer Hobbis (Wageningen University)
- Format:
- Combined Format Open Panel
- Location:
- HG-09A24
- Sessions:
- Friday 19 July, -, -
Time zone: Europe/Amsterdam
Short Abstract:
Junk is potential, a state of transformation. Junk is not trash, although it can be. Junk is that object or person which can be moved between regimes of value, but not always easily. Junk describes, not the thing itself, but the sociocultural categories of worth we apply to, or frame onto, things.
Long Abstract:
This panel argues that the concept of junk can be a productive way to collate acts of disintegration and repair, removal and reformatting—which make up so much of our technologically-mediated everyday lives—as all part of the same transformative process. Theoretically, we tend to figure technological breakdown as an exception to the norm, and position trash and waste as part of a linear movement into uselessness. Yet, this can erase attention to acts of repurposing (what’s been thrown away) and the continued evolution of things that have been trashed, the new life that springs from rot. Junk on the other hand has been used to describe a more nonlinear state of potential, a possibility for things to be moved between regimes of value. It describes, not the thing or person itself, but the sociocultural categories of worth/lessness we apply to, or frame onto, these. Junk can help researchers ask specifically about the formulations of power which define purity and value in the first place, and the forms of labour that are given over to the maintenance or disassembly of things. Junk can help us interrogate sociotechnical imaginations of efficiency, neoliberal self-making and the good working order, and draw attention back to reuse and renewal which capitalist mechanisms work on us to forget. In this panel, junk is an invitation to explore the productive, yet often made invisible, cycles of technologic dis/use and dis/repair. We will use the concept of junk to ask how things are made into trash and under what conditions they may be reclaimed; how the things themselves resist or settle these categorizations as out of our hands; and to draw out the other multi-species possibilities and potentials which linger in trash heaps.
Accepted papers:
Session 1 Friday 19 July, 2024, -Paper short abstract:
This presentation will draw on the display cultures of a scrap market in Delhi, India to present a situated and particular archive and sense of technological experimentation, labor, and the city by whose who create "scrap" - techno-commercial entities that emerge from the dismantling of machines.
Paper long abstract:
India’s capital city, Delhi, is home to one of the country's largest scrap metal markets. Here, discarded industrial and automotive machines are gathered, dismantled, cleaned, piled, segregated and transformed into scrap, parts, and other kinds of commodities that are sold. Its networks reach far beyond the city, across land and sea. I posit the scrap market as an experimental space and phenomenal site to engage with alternative histories of technological inquiry and experimentation and as a space of legitimate work and trade. Drawing on the display cultures of the market, I explore the aesthetics of expertise, the conveyance of excess, the display of inventory, and invocations of affect through the description of different visual structures and forms present throughout the market. These present a particular archive and sense of the city created by those who labor to create “scrap”, techno-commercial entities that blur the boundary between production and consumption, between work and trade, and between raw material, commodity, and waste. I explore how these visual arrangements interrogate notions of belonging, pollution, innovation, power, and possibilities for the continuous (re)making of the city. Scrap and its transformation and trade provides fertile ground to think alongside junk and its manifestations in the global south.
Paper short abstract:
This article analyzes the impact of the Zero Waste Movement in Brazil, with a focus on the promotion of composting and the influence of the “Composteiros do Brasil” network. We also discuss the challenges and progress of the ongoing socio-technical transition in the country's waste management.
Paper long abstract:
Currently, global production of municipal solid waste amounts to 2.01 billion tons, with a disastrous growth estimate for 2050 of 3.40 billion tons (World Bank 2018). This trend towards a growing volume of waste is unsustainable and has long been criticized by environmental social movements critical of the cradle-to-grave model of contemporary throwaway economies. The zero waste movement (ZWM) is one such transnational movement and its main goal is to create an economic system that avoids sending trash to landfills, incinerators, oceans, or any other part of the environment. This paper explores the history and the impact of the ZWM in Brazil through the lens of larger STS discussions on socio-technical transitions. We show how the ZWM in Brazil, associated with local business solutions, has managed to trigger significant socio-technical change in the system of consumption and disposal of organic waste in major urban centers. Our discussion centers on zero waste strategies for promoting composting over discarding, and we give the example of the network “Composteiros do Brasil” (Composters of Brazil), a decentralized organization made up of a hundred composting companies across the country. This network appears to be challenging the hegemonic system of organic waste disposal and management, leading to the emergence of an alternative ensemble that favors composting over sending organic waste to landfills, thus producing significant changes in the final destination of this type of waste. In the conclusion, we discuss some of the limitations of these changes and identify a few challenges ahead.