P199


Polarisation in feminist (queer) theory: reflections on epistemological conundrums  
Convenors:
Rachel Spronk (University of Amsterdam)
Stella Nyanzi (Ruhr Universität Bochum)
Send message to Convenors
Formats:
Panel

Short Abstract

Can we address tensions among ourselves as anthropological feminists through a deeper understanding of is the issue? What are the tensions and where do they come from? What do they teach us?

Long Abstract

When do you feel uninvited or not understood by your fellow feminist scholars? We try to outline a few tensions here but feel free to add. One is the hesitation or refusal by feminists to engage in queer matters. TERFs are the most prominent group, but there are also other, more subtle, forms of avoidance. A second one concerns the lack of acknowledgement of how different standpoints result in different knowledges or approaches. For instance, non-Western female genital operations are variously called mutilation, circumcision or cutting, revealing differences in how to understand women’s lives. A third one relates to positionality and whether scholars are circumscribed to what and whom they can study. Can scholars study and write about race, sexuality, class, age, ability, and many more positionalities, that are not theirs? A fourth one is more epistemological, overlapping with ethnocentrism, to what extent does the ethnocentrist character of feminist thinking impede or silence other conceptual routes? We believe that many tensions arise from how feminist thinking is invested in, and the product of, liberal emancipatory politics. As such, it articulates values of individualism, egalitarianism, the belief in progress, and universalism, whose goal is to undo heteronormative patriarchal structures. This gives rise to reasoning based on binary oppositions, articulated in notions of freedom versus constraint, openness versus conformity, or choice versus obligations when addressing power, whereas life is usually much messier. For instance, this hegemonic approach endorses notions of liberal subjecthood wherein the notion of identity is enfolded whereas not every positionality is understood as a matter of identity. We are interested in papers that engage with tensions, based on empirical realities as researchers and/ or based on our research. We invite you to think about how your case addresses the theoretical challenge that tensions conjure up.

Accepted papers

Session 1