- Convenors:
-
Annika Lindberg
(University of Gothenburg)
Aino Korvensyrjä (University of Helsinki)
Amin Parsa
Send message to Convenors
- Formats:
- Panel
- Network:
- Network Panel
Short Abstract
The panel examines carcerality, understood as the racial capitalist politics and practices that restrict freedom, rights, and access to resources, and explores continuities between past and present configurations of imprisonment, coerced labor, deportation and forms of resistance.
Long Abstract
Abolitionist scholarship and activism use the notion of carcerality to understand the racial
capitalist politics and practices that restrict freedom, rights, and access to resources.
Carcerality, in this sense, is not confined to prisons—it is an effect produced by a range of
practices, institutions, and infrastructures that entrench the unequal distribution of life
chances and expand realms of unfreedom. Criminalization operates across diverse fields of
law, society and culture to justify the deprivation of rights and freedoms for groups of
people. It serves both as a practical gateway to carcerality and as its rationalization. These
two connected concepts help us critically understand the expansion of prisons, asylum
camps, and detention centres, as well as diverse forms of coerced labour, pervasive
surveillance, and the policing and deportation of workers, marginalized populations, and
dissent—even genocide.
How can anthropology address and challenge the current expansion of criminalization and
carcerality? Thinking beyond binaries such as public–private, state–corporate, citizenship–
non-citizenship, and economic–political, this panel invites contributions that trace the
connections between various forms of confinement, coercive social control, and the
production of (disposable) labour. Prisons, workhouses, factories, and plantations share an
entangled history. How can we conceptualize forms of unfreedom, coerced, or surplus
labour across institutions, spaces, and practices usually considered separate? What kinds of
resistance and imaginaries have emerged to challenge carcerality and criminalization as
both practice and effect? How do criminalization and carcerality operate within the current
authoritarian turn? We welcome papers that address contemporary practices or adopt a
longer historical perspective.
This Panel has 2 pending
paper proposals.
Propose paper