Paper short abstract:

This paper explores the complexity of collaborative ethnography when working with older adults with a lower SES. It highlights the power of collaboration in breaking barriers and respecting participants needs, yet reflects on ethical concerns like relational trust and hierarchical reciprocities.

Paper long abstract:

This paper explores the evolving landscape of collaborative ethnography and its complexities by presenting our experience of participatory research with older adults of lower socioeconomic status (SES). In recent years, there has been an increasing emphasis on collaborative research methodologies in ethnographic studies, moving away from the traditional anthropologist-as-observer model towards joint exploration through participatory (action) research and co-creation. Particularly when dealing with older adults of lower SES, a group often characterized by distrust and disappointment towards institutions and researchers due to complicated methodologies and procedures, this approach, driven by reflexivity and creativity, appears promising. In this paper, we reflect on three years of fieldwork focusing on social inclusion among older adults with a lower SES in the Netherlands. Our findings show that collaborative ethnography reduces barriers and establishes a research methodology that has the potential to genuinely respect the participants' needs and wishes. The approach prioritizes a safe and supportive environment built on trust and practical guidance, empowering participants to have their voices heard and thereby fostering a reciprocal relationship where both the researcher and informant learn from each other. Simultaneously, we raise questions about the limitations of collaborative ethnography and the implications of relational trust. For example, what if informed consent is based solely on this trust? Is this ethically sound? And to what extent is the process truly reciprocal? As inherent hierarchies in knowledge, skills, and financial aspects persist. In this paper, we reflect on this complexity, our own role, and our accountabilities as researchers.