Send message to Author

Paper Short Abstract:

What can we learn from sleep, and its failure, about contemporary academia? I discuss not only how academic stress, performance pressure and precarity can cause insomnia, but also how the skills and attitudes one needs to succeed in academia are diametrically opposed to those needed for sleep.

Paper Abstract:

Insomnia is a highly prevalent health concern among anthropologists, and academics more generally. It is often related to (or even caused by) performance pressure and precarity, and it negatively affects people’s ability to perform well and to cope with stress. Moreover, the very skills and attitudes that anthropologists learn to succeed in academia (being self-responsible, hard-working, ambitious, and even vigilant towards superiors, competitors, and peers) are fundamentally opposed to those that are needed to achieve sleep (i.e. patiency, trust, surrender). Academic insomniacs thus often find themselves in a vicious, and seemingly inescapable, cycle of stress and sleeplessness which, over time, often results in depression, burnout, and in severe cases even suicide.

Drawing on ongoing research with people suffering from insomnia (many anthropologists among them), who often experience sleeplessness as a situation of existential crisis and powerlessness, my paper analyzes the manifold links between mental health and contemporary academic research. In particular, I seek to complexify the links between agency, ambition, and achievement. Sleep has a paradoxical relation to intention, and it fundamentally challenges the idea of mastery and self-control: the more one actively tries to sleep, the less possible it becomes. Once it has “chosen to arrive”, sleep is unstoppable. But often people desperately wait for it – and it doesn’t come. In my paper, I take the latter situation – the insomniac’s quintessential dilemma – as a starting point to think about the problems, and failures, of neoliberal academia.

Send message to Author

Paper Short Abstract:

The paper addresses the difficulties of doing fieldwork on witchcraft and demonic possession in Romania and Russia and of living as academic migrants with family, dealing constantly with stress and insecurity.

Paper Abstract:

Are we choosing our research topics, or they are choosing us? Is there any relationship between our life history, family background and our research?

As a young doctoral student, I spent years studying witchcraft in a Romanian village, where my family lives. Later on, as a postdoc, I went to study demonic possession, exorcism and conversion in Russia, together with my anthropologist husband and two small children. We divorced after this fieldwork and I continued my life as a single mother, being employed by research institutions and university departments, moving several times with the children.

While the difficulties of studying witchcraft and demonic possession were problematic only for myself, migration and insecurity were constantly challenging the mental health of the family members. Writing up past research, engaging in new ones for the sake of survival, and caring for mental health went hand in hand in the last fifteen years. The paper aims to share empowering experiences and related reflections.

Send message to Author

Paper Short Abstract:

This paper examines the challenges of treating the (re)circulation of recordings as an ethnographic work, particularly when (re)circulating sensitive sound materials that contain the voices of Central Asian Nazi collaborators to descendants who might not want to listen.

Paper Abstract:

During WWII recordings were made in Vienna with citizens from Central Asia – Red Army soldiers who appear to have become members of SS and Wehrmacht.

The (re)circulation of this ethically sensitive sound materials to descendants in Central Asia is the starting point of doing ethnography. While reconnecting these recorded voices with the cultural environments of their source communities, (re)circulation is not the end but rather the initiation of a complex process. It is the reintroduction of these sound materials, which may be re-inscribed with a multitude of local meanings the home localities of the recorded individuals.

How will the descendants react if the words they listen and the information these recordings unveil evoke ethical predicaments or shame?

How do we as researchers deal with the mental load we impose on the recipients of “restituted” objects? Are we as ethnographers prepared for (re)circulation projects with our fieldwork methods ?

The risks and hazards in ethnographic fieldwork are not always predictable or preventable in advance. Could supervision or a mentoring program, especially during the fieldwork, help to guide ethnographers through the multilayered (including psychological) challenges of fieldwork? I believe so. Through an accompanying mentorship, ethnographers could assess risks and ethical dilemmas, enhancing their ability to critically engage with their work and its reverberations in the field.

Send message to Author

Paper Short Abstract:

My paper aims at addressing questions related to the links between the difficulties and challenges encountered by ethnologists and anthropologists nowadays and mental health in specific post-covid crisis, in conflictual times, as well as under the pressure of neoliberal academia requirements.

Paper Abstract:

My paper aims at addressing questions related to the links between the difficulties and challenges encountered by ethnologists and anthropologists nowadays, and mental health, in specific post-covid crisis, conflictual times, as well as under the pressure of neoliberal academia requirements and debatable competitive frames.

Mainly, I attempt to focus on the case of ethologists and anthropologists working in Cluj-Napoca (Romania), part of them in a research institute, the other one at the University, documenting the main professional problems they face at present, as well as the ways their mental health is affected in and by recent micro and macro contexts (the new academic demands, their inadequacies, the new political, economic, social contexts characterised by uncertainty and unrest).

My intention is also to underline and assess how the interviewed ethologists/anthropologists’ entire perspectives on fieldwork, work motivations, ethics, habits, flow have been reshaped in these turbulent times, what kind of crises have been triggered by all these changes produced in a relatively short period of time, and how all these challenged mental health.

Specifically, through in depth interviews, as well as life histories, I also attempt to investigate the current meanings of competitions, newly created solidarities, the power relations as they are redefined in the framework of the focused on institutions.

Meanwhile, valuing the interviewees' narratives, I aim at approaching the specific dynamics of New Normal, Great Resignation and Quiet Quitting as concepts but also as social/cultural realities.

Send message to Authors

Paper Short Abstract:

Trauma can come into tension with anthropological methods in many different ways. Based on a survey conducted among anthropologists in 2023, we argue for the integration of trauma into methods training, presenting ideas to enable a shift in attitudes towards trauma in Anthropology departments.

Paper Abstract:

Trauma can come into tension with anthropological methods in many different ways. In this paper, we revisit Pollard’s (2009) survey of the emotional experiences of fieldwork among anthropology PhD students, entitled ‘Field of Screams: Difficulty and ethnographic fieldwork’, which is to our knowledge the first systematic study of emotional and psychological impacts of anthropological fieldwork on the researcher. We then discuss our research into the experiences of anthropologists engaged in fieldwork, drawing from a survey conducted in 2023, in which we sought to understand: (1) preparation for fieldwork, including personal preparation, formal support and the ethics process; (2) fieldwork experiences, including forms of trauma exposure and other aspects of context which may have heightened vulnerability or reactivity to traumatic stressors; (3) researcher responses to accumulated distress of fieldwork; and finally (4) how supervisory relationships and institutional culture shape and influence researchers’ experience. We argue for the integration of trauma into research methods training, presenting ideas to enable a shift in attitudes towards trauma in Anthropology departments. This paper draws from an article co-authored with Maureen Freed, UKCP-accredited practitioner and supervisor of psychotherapy, specialising in trauma who has led a Trauma Clinic treating fieldwork-related trauma at a university in the UK, and trains researchers to help prevent and mitigate the emotional and psychological impact of research.

Send message to Author

Paper Short Abstract:

How can we prepare ourselves, our students, and colleagues for the ways in which the 'good life' fantasies continue to ensnare us in anthropology? The forming of ‘anxious solidarities’ around mental health might lead towards a more equitable distribution of recognition and security in anthropology.

Paper Abstract:

There has been much talk of a rising mental health crisis in anthropology in recent years. In the “Precarity Report”, Fotta et al. (2020) outline a couple of factors that could help us understand the impact of working conditions on mental health and well-being: only 42.7% of surveyed EASA members covered their living expenses solely from wages and from one full-time job; 53% experienced discrimination, unfair treatment, harassment, bullying, physical and emotional abuse. Last but not least, while 68% think it is unlikely they will get a permanent post within the next 5 years, only 4% are seriously planning to get out of academia. This keeps academics into a deadlock: the uneven distribution of security and stability re/produces the existential precarity of academics, including the inability to plan the future. How have rising rates of academic precarity and the incessant push towards mobility have contributed to mental health issues and lack of social support? These insecurities impact the doing of both teaching and research in anthropology. However, anthropologists have a duty of care towards themselves, their students, colleagues and supervisors to talk about the impact of academic precarity on mental health. As Eli Thorkelson (2018) put it, how can we prepare ourselves, our students, colleagues, and supervisors for the ways that our fantasies of a good life continue to ensnare us in anthropology? The forming of ‘anxious solidarities’ (Kingsmith 2023) and alliances around mental health and academic precarity can hopefully lead towards a more equitable distribution of recognition and security.

Send message to Author

Paper Short Abstract:

The paper introduces the term “vexed intimacies” to consider personal and methodological challenges of navigating interactions with potentially dangerous interlocutors while aiming to do emancipatory and inclusive knowledge gathering in the field of residential psychiatry in Denmark

Paper Abstract:

As a junior researcher doing ethnography in residential psychiatry for people living with severe mental illness and substance use, I have wavered when considering the anthropological professionalism of building genuine relationships in the field. By the unbearable idea of potentially reproducing a marginalization of people I long to help, if adding my occasional suspicion to the equation, I have been reluctant to write about how I felt when I was told to always wear an assault alarm during fieldwork. I have disallowed myself to think, or let alone speak, about my fear, when a man suspected me of stealing his amphetamine during the night, or when a woman, who the day before had smashed a thermos into the face of another resident, screamed at me for not opening her door in a timely fashion.

Following contemporary methodological discussions within feminist or decolonial theory, I describe the dilemma of navigating interactions with potentially dangerous interlocutors while aiming to do emancipatory and inclusive knowledge gathering, what I suggest to be understood as 'vexed intimacies’. Similar considerations of professionalism reappear in an emic mirror by staff. Behind closed doors, safety concerns, boundary issues, compassion fatigue, non-disclosure of personal information, and involvement in police complaints and trials consistently occupy the office space.

This paper explores a parallel hesitancy to consider one's mental well-being when working with individuals perceived as dangerous, as both an autoethnographic contribution to the discourse on methodology and researcher position in anthropology and an emic discussion of mental healthcare in Denmark.

Send message to Author

Paper Short Abstract:

Drawing on my recent fieldwork experience in Japan during the covid pandemic, the paper discusses how mental distress in the field must be understood as a symptom of a complex intersection of unfavourable structural conditions, as well as personal predicaments.

Paper Abstract:

In dialogue with the growing number of social anthropologists, mostly women, who have recently engaged with this topic, I will discuss my ethnographic experience in Japan during the coronavirus pandemic and the mental health issues I faced while in the field. 

In late autumn 2019, I moved to Tokyo to conduct my postdoctoral research. Full of enthusiasm, I quickly immersed myself in reading the relevant literature. But when the coronavirus hit Japan in early 2020, my professional work came to a complete halt. Instead, I desperately searched for information on how to protect myself and my family from infection. Living far away from a reliable social network did not help with my worries. As a result, I gradually found myself in an undesirable situation, feeling anxious and depressed. This disturbed mental well-being strongly influenced my research decisions and consequently the research design throughout my stay in Japan.

In retrospect, however, I am well aware that my mental health problems in the field were not only caused by the pandemic, but also by the wider structural situation. I am not referring to inadequate institutional support per se, but to the precarious economic situation I found myself in after completing my PhD. I will argue that the neoliberal academy, with its demanding working conditions, combined with the precarious economic situation faced by early career researchers in particular, takes its toll on our mental well-being and negatively impacts both our professional and personal selves.