Click the star to add/remove an item to/from your individual schedule.
You need to be logged in to avail of this functionality.
Log in
- Convenors:
-
Markus Rudolf
(Addis Ababa University)
Tabea Scharrer (Leipzig University)
Send message to Convenors
- Format:
- Panel
- Location:
- Peter Froggatt Centre (PFC), 03/012
- Sessions:
- Friday 29 July, -
Time zone: Europe/London
Short Abstract:
This panel focuses on how ideas of desired political communalities as well as practices of solidarity and association change in the process of forced migration. These transformations can relate to and are influenced by the experiences of leaving and settling in various localities.
Long Abstract:
We welcome presentations that look primarily into the ideas of political communalities, which people on the move carry with them - and the question how these ideas relate to experienced realities in a diachronic and transnational perspective. We intend to gather proposals from varied contexts to compare (i) the change of ideas on how commons should look like in the course of movements, (ii) how these ideas influence alliances among forced migrants and with local populations, and (iii) how they affect boundary making and (un)commoning.
Much of the political and academic debate on (forced) migration evolves around issues of protracted states of limbo, immobility, or vulnerability, carrying with them an image of refugees as being acted upon. This panel takes a different stand and asks what role refugees and forced migrants have as actors in social transformations.
We encourage submissions that examine how ideas of political communalities influence specific trajectories, how they change in the course of forced migration, and how these ideas are mobile in themselves and hence transforming the commons: Who is seen as belonging to the commons in the localities forced migrants have to leave or settle in? What repercussions do these discourses have on forced migrants’ own future making? What influence do both issues have on political mobilization and association?
Accepted papers:
Session 1 Friday 29 July, 2022, -Paper short abstract:
Thousands of Ukrainians displaced by Russia’s invasion are arriving to Finland, where they are greeted by a volunteer movement coordinated by the Ukrainian diaspora. How are Ukrainian volunteering practices transferred to the Finnish context, and what impact will this self-organisation have?
Paper long abstract:
Since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February this year, two social phenomena have intensified massively in Ukraine. One is the mobility of people fleeing war; while the war in Ukraine’s Donbas region had already created almost two million internally displaced people since 2014, the recent full-scale invasion has uprooted at least five times as many people, with a large share of them now fleeing abroad. Further, a vibrant volunteer movement existed in Ukraine especially since the Euromaidan Revolution, often responding to the needs of the army, internally displaced people, and other groups of vulnerable citizens much faster than the state. Since February 2022, this volunteer movement has expanded further and almost every Ukrainian has become a volunteer in some capacity or other.
This paper examines the confluence of these phenomena, that is, the arrival of displaced Ukrainians and the Ukrainian volunteer movement in Finland. The Association of Ukrainians has rapidly responded to the needs of their compatriots arriving to Finland by creating volunteer structures analogous to the ones emerging in Ukraine. The question is how the flexible culture of volunteer organisation, geared towards fixing problems immediately, fares in the Finnish context, where welfare provisioning usually comes from the state rather than volunteer organisations, and where a strong normative expectation of doing things by the book can lead to a degree of inflexibility. What impact will the Ukrainian volunteer movement have on Finnish refugee organisations, work culture, or principles of immigration reception? What tensions will emerge?
Paper short abstract:
The study of Bangladeshi migrants in Rome and London shows how migration can be considered a project of good parenting and self-fulfilment entrusted to the new generations, leading to expectations and responsibilities that can generate unexpected results and frictions, widening the generational gap
Paper long abstract:
Usually associated with extreme poverty, overpopulation and environmental instability, the Bangladeshi diaspora demonstrates, however, its being rooted in the capacity to aspire and on the concept of future built on the basis of multiple stimuli, in the form of media images and ideas of a desirable life that circulates in our hyper-connected world.
Reversing the old idea of migrants as agentless individuals, moved by the forces of macrostructural powers, they seem to be able to imagine and position themselves in the present, using their agency to take advantage of the possibilities the globalised world offers, in order to complete the life project they designed for their future.
In the specific case-study, the internationalisation of education system, and the importance of English as the key language for education, fundamental to accessing the global labour market, strongly influenced both the trajectory of their migratory path, and the collective narration over the historical significance this specific language have had in a country that emerged as a nation-state out of a strong linguistic identity. A three-years ethnographic research project, carried out on the Bangladeshi community of Rome, made it possible to overcome the dominant perspective of a periphery attracted by the centre, and demonstrated to what extent the centre itself, in a world where local imaginaries are heavily affected by the global circulation of dominant models, indirectly contributes in reshaping regional collective identities and activate mobility strategies.
Paper short abstract:
My paper looks at silent, non-heroic acts of resistance of indigenous people from the Karen and Shan communities against the brutalities of the Myanmar state. In the center is the vulnerability of the ordinary people caught in this momentum, but also their resilience and creativity (Kulick).
Paper long abstract:
Based on a decade of ethnographic fieldwork in Eastern Myanmar, Northwest Thailand, and beyond, my paper looks at the silent, non-heroic acts of resistance of indigenous people from the Karen and Shan communities moving to Thailand and to the West from Myanmar to the development programs and violence from state agents, humanitarian agents, and capital investors who try to manage and contain them (Scott 1990). It describes the rural Angst (Turner 2009) that was produced in the semi-democratic (but authoritarian) period before the coup, the impact of modernization on the life of communities, and the increasing popular protest the devastating effects of resource exploitation on livelihood. The paper examines the mafia-style strategies of state agents that have only worsened after the coup, and the increasing “vernacular” resistance against the brutalities of the state. The paper also describes alternative ways of resource management by the Karen and Shan communities and the impact of modernization and social and military control on the livelihood of ordinary people and on their aspirations to make a living by connectivity over distance. “Vernacular” (Brković 2020) thus describes local and humanitarian efforts at the grassroots level as well as in the Diaspora to counter social separateness. In the center is the vulnerability of the ordinary people caught in this momentum, but also their resilience (Kulick).