Click the star to add/remove an item to/from your individual schedule.
You need to be logged in to avail of this functionality.
Log in
- Convenors:
-
Shaheed Tayob
(Stellenbosch University)
Margaretha van Es (Utrecht University)
Send message to Convenors
- Formats:
- Panels
- Sessions:
- Wednesday 22 July, -, -
Time zone: Europe/Lisbon
Short Abstract:
We invite paper submissions for a panel on restaurants owned and/or frequently visited by minoritized people. We are particularly interested in ethnographic studies linking food, materiality and memory to questions of value, co-existence, conflict and the ambiguities of (non) belonging.
Long Abstract:
The study of minoritized people is often occupied with questions of 'immigrant integration' and the 'accommodation of diversity'. This research, while incredibly important in the contemporary moment, betrays normative political assumptions regarding the ability of newcomers to adjust to majority contexts, and likewise the ability of host contexts, legal frameworks and institutional settings to accommodate newcomers. An unfortunate side-effect is the reification of outsiders and insiders, and the re-enforcement of national and ethnic identities. In the meantime, as scholars debate questions of accommodation, minoritized people across the world actively negotiate their position in society. Set within the fraught context of nationalist and right-wing resurgences across the globe, restaurants become material locations for the negotiation of belonging, memory and identity. Whether we study Sufi-owned restaurants in Muslim neighborhoods of Mumbai, or fashionable halal restaurants in major European cities, these sites are material expressions of self and community that cross neat boundaries of 'us' and 'them', but that may also evoke a negative backlash. However, as places for the production, consumption and exchange of food, restaurants are also places where memories of home, tastes of nostalgia, as well as ethical values are practiced, embodied and materialized. In introducing new questions and directions for the ethnographic study of restaurants, we aim to offer a new avenue for the comparative study of diversity and the everyday lived experiences of minorities in diverse contexts.
Accepted papers:
Session 1 Wednesday 22 July, 2020, -Paper short abstract:
Based on an ethnographic investigation of several Vietnamese restaurants in Leipzig, Germany, this paper details the ways in which food became a tool for Vietnamese migrants to make sense of their migratory experience while negotiating their sense of (non)belonging and identity in the host country.
Paper long abstract:
Food is an extraordinarily important element for identity constructions. By adhering to a specific food culture, people staged and performed their identities. Through the creation, presentation, and consumption of food, identities are continuously negotiated. In the case of Vietnamese migrants in Germany, food stands and restaurants became ways in which Vietnamese contract workers who faced precarious status in Germany after the reunification of the two German states gained legal status and eventually became one of the most successful migrant groups in the country. Yet, the 'success story' of Vietnamese migrants in Germany can only be perceived as a success from a specific viewpoint. By emphasizing the positive effects of food businesses on migrants' integration and cultural enrichment of the host societies, the process of self-understanding and subsequently the negotiation of migrants' identities and belonging are ignored. Based on an ethnographic investigation of several Vietnamese owned restaurants in Leipzig, Germany, This paper details the way in which food became a tool for Vietnamese migrants to make sense of their migratory experience while negotiating their sense of (non)belonging and identity in the host country. The paper will show that precisely through the precarious status of restaurant owners and workers, new forms of (non)belonging and identities emerge as they navigate through the boundaries of the societies they are a part of.
Paper short abstract:
A critical ethnographical study of the discrimination against one's food habits, culture and identity in the context of NE migrants in Delhi. It examines the popularity of ethnic restaurants amidst racism issues and argues that the eating of 'smelly' food in homes/restaurants is an act of resistance
Paper long abstract:
The last two decades have witnessed an increased number of migrants from the Northeast to the metropolitan cities of India. These different-looking people with 'small eyes' face racism in their new cities. As many of the tribes and indigenous people in the Northeast are known to have migrated from Southeast Asia at different historical points and the region is closer to the neighbouring countries than the rest of India, geographically and ethnologically, various aspects of everyday life such as food habits bear similarities to different parts of Southeast Asia. Fermented soyabean is a delicacy enjoyed across the Northeast and Southeast Asia. Racism against northeasterners have been linked with institutional violence that manifests in various ways. The fact that Delhi police issued an a booklet to advise the migrants against cooking and eating 'smelly' food items such as fermented soyabean can be seen as a move of structural violence against these ethnic minorities. The paper takes the approach of critical ethnography and qualitative research to study how discrimination against one's food habits actualizes as discrimination against ones values, culture and identity in the context of northeastern migrants in Delhi. It examines the rising popularity of Manipuri and Naga restaurants amidst racism issues. It argues that the eating and selling of 'smelly' food items in homes and the ethnic restaurants in the city become a significant act of resistance. The fight for one's culture and identity through one's kitchen and restaurants has to be a part of the larger movement against racism.
Paper short abstract:
This paper explores how the symbolism of Koreanness is displayed through cuisine in contemporary Japan. Long-silenced minority expressions of Koreanness in the context of ‘homogeneous’ national rhetoric take advantage of the wave of global consumption.
Paper long abstract:
This paper explores how Korean migrants and their descendants gradually negotiate with a process of displaying their ethnic identity through cuisine in contemporary Japan. Since the defeat of the Pacific War in 1945, the post-war Japan has maintained the ideology of homogeneous Japan as the national identity. The Korean minority’s sense of belonging in Japan is complex, especially because Japan’s dominant ‘monoethnic’ national identity in its media, education system and socio-political discourse has all demanded a certain level of commitment such as the use of Japanese aliases to ‘pass’ as Japanese persons and to refrain from an overt display of the ethnic identity. Although the Korean cuisine was originally perceived as taboo in Japan, its popularity had gradually grown in the last few decades. One of the reasons is Japan’s expansion in various forms of global consumption and cultural appropriation, and the country is also forced to internationalise by taking in an increased number of new foreign labour immigrants. Recently, Japanese society started to acknowledge the embodied diversity, and the long-hidden Korean cultural artefacts such as food, music, and cultural products started to appear in the Japanese mainstream culture. By blending in the stream of multicultural consumption, the Korean cuisine has gained its space and recognition in the Japanese market. The Korean food products and culinary events have become the cornerstone of the Korean minority’s ethnic expressions in various socio-political platforms and cultural production. By repositioning Korean cultural artefacts such as food, the Korean ethnicity is increasingly being accepted by Japanese society.
Paper long abstract:
This paper presents a case study about food culture in Katsikas Camp/Greece. Humanity, recently, for the First time in human history, has succeeded in producing enough food for everyone. Therefore, we need better understanding of food so that we can provide better food and encourage better use of it to all and especially those in vulnerability. Despite being a biological imperative, food is also a human activity and like any other human activity, it is regulated by socio cultural habits. The word "Culture" has become a trend world while, Culture sells. Being cultural is now considered "cool". "'Culture'—the word itself, or some local equivalent, is on everyone's lips. The rise of refugee cuisine is being noticed. The UNHCR has organized refugee food festivals in collaboration with dozens of buzzing restaurants everywhere from Amsterdam to Madrid and New York City to San Francisco. The present article, through storytelling, brings real life stories of individuals' (residents of a refugee camp) and their food business solutions. Small businesses were created based on cultural or family recipes, bringing individuals a living out of food heritage. However, Greek government policies attempted to shut down these informal businesses.
Paper short abstract:
This paper considers the narrative and material practices of Turkish-inspired restaurant owners in Berlin as a site for thinking through the complexities of memory, belonging and care through food.
Paper long abstract:
This paper focusses on a particular restaurant space in Berlin as a location for understanding what it means to be a migrant-origin entrepreneur in an important European capital. The restaurant owner's narrative of discovery, love for the labor of food, and a sense of belonging to different worlds become materialized in the restaurant space as an aesthetic sensibility, and material food practice. The case study offers a site through which to think about memory, belonging, and care as integral to the way in which minoritized people make a place in the city.
Paper short abstract:
This paper will explore how Palestinian food-spaces owners in Israel perceive the concept of kashrut, how it changes the food they serve, and what meanings they attribute to the process. I will suggest three patterns of assimilation of kashrut laws (in the broad sense) in Palestinian businesses.
Paper long abstract:
Kashrut, the Jewish dietary regulations, is a central feature of food in Israel, even in places inhabited by non-Jews. About one-fifth of Israel's citizens are Palestinians, most of whom are Muslims who observe the halal laws. Israeli Jews have become increasingly interested in Palestinian food in recent years. In many Palestinian restaurants, bakeries, and other food-spaces in Israel, negotiations are held over the concept of kashrut. Business owners adjust their foods to the Israeli-Jewish "taste" while presenting different shades of kashrut.
This paper will explore how Palestinian food-spaces owners perceive the concept of kashrut, how it changes the food they serve, and what meanings they attribute to the process. Although Palestinian food business owners explain that the main reason for dealing with kashrut issues is economical, it also reflects the question of the belonging of the Palestinian minority in Israel.
Following ethnographic research in Palestinian city in Israel, I will suggest three patterns of assimilation of kashrut laws (in the broad sense) in Palestinian businesses. The three are Official Kashrut, where the business operates under the supervision of HaRabanut HaRashit (The Chief Rabbinate of Israel) and holds a formal certificate. Declarative kashrut, in which a great effort is made to act according to kashrut laws, but the business does not meet the formal conditions and does not hold an official certificate. Finally, Interceding Kashrut, the most common pattern in which there are minor intentional adjustments to kashrut laws.
Paper short abstract:
This paper explores the strained conversation between migrants and pro-migrant activists on the potential and hazards of using popular ethnic foods to foster mutual understanding and promote acceptance by the predominantly xenophobic mainstream society in an emerging immigration state, Slovakia.
Paper long abstract:
In countries that self-identify as traditionally homogeneous, the appearance of restaurants offering dishes from different cuisines and cultural backgrounds is among the first visible tokens of commencing international immigration. These establishments are usually welcomed by locals, even in Slovakia, where the arrival of migrants is perceived predominantly as a threat: Politicians cater to the populations' anxieties, fueling xenophobic sentiments and fear of "foreign infiltration". The paper is based on fieldwork in a Bratislava-based NGO and their awareness-raising campaign titled "Cudzincov máme plné zuby", a provocative play with words that can be translated to "We are fed up with foreigners" as well as "We are being fed by foreigners". The project, which entailed the creation of a "foodie-map" of minority restaurants in Bratislava, takes Slovak appreciation of foreign foods as a starting point to negotiate the acceptance and belonging of the people who make it. This promotion of openness and community over food is juxtaposed with the experience of many foreigners of being barred from the local labor market and having to resort to unskilled, precarious and oftentimes irregular positions in gastronomic establishments, particularly those that are ethnically marked but do not intersect with their own origins, like Kebab stands and Indian restaurants. Describing how Slovaks and non-Slovaks interpret the multifarious symbolic dimensions of offering each other food, I explore the tensions between celebrating diversity, reifying difference and glossing over race- and class-based discrimination in an emerging immigration society.
Paper short abstract:
This study explores how women successfully challenged the way in which dominant male social constraints defined and molded them by demanding space in meyhane, a type of restaurant found in Turkey which dates back to the Byzantine Empire. My research will show how women have pushed the doors of meyhane open, claiming their seats at the table, reinventing the “authentic” meyhane. By doing so, women have forced not only the meyhane to redefine itself, but also the dominant social and cultural discourses to reinterpret what the public is and what being a woman means in Turkey. Of course various studies have been done to see how women resisted and provoked change, but this is a particular novel field. Meyhane was such an exclusively male space for a while that women’s entrance indeed speaks volumes to the manner in which they caused a cultural transformation. The objective of the research is to identify the determining factors and characteristics that help formulate “authenticity” in modern day meyhane now that women have unlocked a place at the cilingir sofrasi.
Paper long abstract:
Food is an important part of culture and can be a symbol of pride for a community. Since food itself can be considered a cultural symbol, attention should be paid to the relation among food and culture. What is of particular interest is the manner in which food, through identities are constructed, re-interpreted, challenged, and modified, reflects or perhaps tells us a story about culture itself. The examination of authenticity has gained importance in our increasingly multi-cultural society. While scholars agree that defining authenticity is challenging because of the influences of globalization, the demand for “authentic” food experiences continues.
This study explores how women successfully challenged the way in which dominant male social constraints defined and molded them by demanding space in meyhane, a type of restaurant found in Turkey which dates back to the Byzantine Empire. My research will show how women have pushed the doors of meyhane open, claiming their seats at the table, reinventing the “authentic” meyhane. By doing so, women have forced not only the meyhane to redefine itself, but also the dominant social and cultural discourses to reinterpret what the public is and what being a woman means in Turkey. The objective of the research is to identify the determining factors and characteristics that help formulate “authenticity” in modern day meyhane now that women have unlocked a place at the cilingir sofrasi.
Based on a pilot study done during a semester at Boğaziçi University, I developed a research framework to investigate how people create authenticity within the meyhanes of Istanbul, Turkey using qualitative analysis. The methodological framework is based on open-ended interviews with restaurant owners throughout the many burrows of Istanbul. The study contains data from both the European and Asian sides of the city. The face-to-face interviews were conducted at the restaurants of the respondents. Snowball sampling was used to recruit respondents. Archival data was also gathered on how women first made their way into the meyhane, and what the social reaction to their presence was.
Previous research acknowledges the complexities of how societies define “authentic” food and the constant evolution of the concept. Of course various studies have been done to see how women resisted and caused change, but this is a particular novel field. Meyhane was such an exclusively male space for a while that women’s entrance indeed speaks volumes to the manner in which they caused a cultural transformation. As all “authentic” identities are constructed and culturally fragmented by society, initially so was the data that was collected from the restaurant owners, but patterns started to emerge through analysis. Woman dominated the recurring themes surrounding cultural social change. The role of the environment, food and culture resonated, but meyhane, an “authentic” experience has withstood historical changes, and kept its core identity intact for centuries. The meyhane creates the “third place” where everyone is welcome, including women, and people are accepted and allowed to be “authentic”.
Paper short abstract:
The systematisation of qualitative material collected between 2012 and 2018 by means of a thorough ethnographic investigation carried out in different bars in Barcelona, is a res- ponse to the detection of an obvious lack of a formulation of a solid problematic theoretic- methodological that evidences the depth of the relationship between urban anthropology and the bar, as a builder of urbanity. We thus propose the opening of a new strand of analy- sis, based on the contributions of urban studies, proxemics, sociology, architecture and anthropology of feeding, which in the field opened by this discipline, Gastropology, find their connective structure. The proposal departs from the notion of "frontier" as an analytical category of the urban, within which whose dimensions, the margin and the centre constantly touch. In Gastropo- logy, the bar is configured as a paradigmatic and unique space-frontier: a physical, symbo- lic, cognitive and political framework, perceptible only through its movement, endowed with meaning as a product of its dialectical relationship with what is outside from the frontality. Frontality is the condition of interacting from the front and implies spatial and social proxi- mity. Being outside is the antagonistic position that is assumed with respect to that of the dog- matic. The border allows the simultaneity of the two conditions giving rise to, or generating space for, unprecedented social and political practices, consolidating the infinity of possible out- comes. In gastropology, the bar is interpreted as an irreplaceable socialising agent, stage and trig- ger of the non-hierarchical encounter. In other words, frontal, everything with everything: the bodies, the spaces, their components and their coordinates.
Paper long abstract:
the form of sociability that develops in bars, in all its modalities, corresponds to the idea of worldliness, which obliges each participant to maintain at all times a plurality of language that allows them to feel comfortable in the variety of social frameworks in which they are involved. This relational versatility presupposes a certain sideways glance of one’s identity in order to facilitate its adaptability, since an excessive degree of protago- nism on the part of the speaker would be considered impolite, in a context in which mutual praise and mutual signs of interest prevail. As noted, those attending a bar – regulars, if they are habitual – hope to meet people who, like them, want and try to remain at the same time both unknown and available. This is an example in miniature of what Lyn H. Lo- fland (1973) calls, referring to social life in public places in general, "a society of strangers", or, in other words, a society of people who maintain a link that can be deep, but not strategic, like those linked by ties of friendship. (Cucó, 2001).
Social life in bars implies, in effect, a “school of worldliness”, in which each of those pre- sent displays an ability to behave in public in scenarios open to relationships, predisposing themselves to submit to the requests and judgements of those who share with him that same space and to move in this world with a certain agility. It is thus about an “indetermi- nate sociability”, open to a constant "anticipation of what’s coming", for which this abstrac- tion of social identity and the privilege of the mask and disguise is indispensable.
Given that those in attendance join each relationship as indeterminate characters, they must do so by instantly becoming sociologists or ethnologists, being continuously able to
interpret what others are saying and doing, which is essential to know what attitude to take at any given moment. It refers to that process of instruction that every individual, in modern and urban contexts, performs throughout their life, through which they acquire a whole re- pertoire of meanings and competences that enables them to know how to read and mana- ge the social code in and through the variety of scenarios that make up the urban scene (Lofland, 1973: 97). Those who meet in a bar, whether regularly or sporadically, apply in their meetings a layman’s sociology, understood by Garfinkel (2006 [1968]) as that practi- cal knowledge available to every individual to interpret what happens and understand and execute what must be done from the detection of patterns of behaviour shared with those with whom they communicate in meetings, such as those of a bar, ephemeral and infor- mal.
The environment of each room, the distribution of its movable elements, the lighting, the spatial behaviour of those present, as well as the proxemic and kinetic dimensions of the behaviours that are recorded, from an ethology inspired viewpoint, will be described in de- tail.
Beyond the traditionally understood participant observation, we know that this practice of ethnographic investigation takes different forms in the scenario investigated, being able to be used “simultaneously, sequentially or alternatively” (Ferrándiz, 2011: 90). What is known as non-obtrusive observation or simple observation (Webb et al., 2000) consists in following the flows of action without actively intervening or interfering with them.
Naturally, semi-structured and in-depth interviews are going to take place. These inter- views will be considered complementary tools to the participant and non-obtrusive obser- vation, seeking the way in which the subjects themselves rationalise their experiences in these meeting places.
Paper short abstract:
This paper discusses the emergence of trendy halal restaurants in Rotterdam that do not serve alcohol. Based on interviews and participant observation, this paper provides a material analysis of how religious plurality is being negotiated in the West-Kruiskade, a street famous for its diversity.
Paper long abstract:
This paper focuses on a number of new and fashionable halal restaurants located along the West-Kruiskade in Rotterdam. Although these Muslim-owned restaurants differ in terms of cuisine and interior decorations, they have in common that they only serve halal-certified meat and do not serve alcohol. The customers are highly diverse in terms of ethnicity and religious affiliation, but this new form of 'hip halal dining' is especially popular among young Muslims who have experienced strong upward social mobility. However, these restaurants have also become a subject of political contestation, with the local authorities and the housing corporation arguing that the growing number of alcohol-free halal restaurants 'negatively affects the diversity in the neighbourhood'. In analyzing these restaurants as 'aesthetic formations' (Meyer 2009), this paper raises questions about how diversity is conceptualized by different social actors, what it means to be inclusive, and on whose terms and conditions religious plurality is being facilitated in particular settings.