T0678


Prometheism, Empire, and Borderland Networks: Polish, Ukrainian, and Tatar Actors in Manchuria 
Convenors:
Olga Khomenko (University of Oxford)
Mariusz Borysiewicz (Ruhr University Bochum)
Larisa Usmanova (Russian State University for Humanities)
Send message to Convenors
Chairs:
Olga Khomenko (University of Oxford)
Larisa Usmanova (Russian State University for Humanities)
Format:
Panel
Section:
History

Short Abstract

This panel explores how Promethean activism, anti-Soviet strategy, and transnational networks intersected in Manchuria, focusing on Polish, Ukrainian, and Turk-Tatar actors. It examines intelligence cooperation, émigré politics, and everyday life to rethink Prometheism in the Far East.

Long Abstract

This panel explores the entanglement of Promethean activism, anti-Soviet strategy, and transnational networks in Manchuria during the interwar and wartime years, focusing on Polish, Ukrainian, and Turk-Tatar actors operating in the region. Manchuria served not only as a geopolitical frontier shaped by Japanese imperial policy and Soviet power, but also as a crucial arena in which émigré national movements, intelligence services, and cultural organizations intersected.

The first paper examines Polish–Japanese intelligence cooperation in Manchuria between 1932 and 1941, tracing how shared anti-Soviet objectives fostered collaboration, exchange of information, and overlapping strategic interests, while also revealing the unequal nature of this relationship under conditions of Japanese dominance. The second paper turns to Turk-Tatar émigré participation in the Promethean movement, analyzing the role of Gayaz Iskhaki and the Committee for the Independence of the Volga-Ural Region, and situating their activities within broader interwar efforts to mobilize non-Russian nationalities against Soviet power. The third paper focuses on Ukrainian Promethean activist and writer Stepan Levynskyi, whose published and newly discovered manuscripts provide insight not only into political activism but also into the everyday domestic and social worlds of multiethnic Manchuria.

Together, the papers demonstrate how Manchuria functioned as a contact zone of empire, resistance, and collaboration, where political strategy intersected with intelligence work, émigré organizing, and daily life. By integrating diplomatic, cultural, and social history, the panel offers new perspectives on Prometheism as both ideology and lived practice in the Far East.

Abstract in Japanese (if needed)

Accepted papers