T0198


Interversity: A new perspective on social diversity in contemporary Japan  
Convenor:
Wolfram Manzenreiter (University of Vienna)
Send message to Convenor
Discussant:
Andreas Eder-Ramsauer (University of Vienna)
Format:
Panel
Section:
Anthropology and Sociology

Short Abstract

Interversity is a new and critical way of thinking about social change and diversity. Scholars from different generations and academic fields demonstrate that interversity in Japan is comprised of multiple categories of otherness and their intersecting and interrelated features.

Long Abstract

In recent years, research on immigration and the politics of multicultural co-existence has shaped the image of a new Japan that is carefully embracing ethnic diversity to maintain national stability. While these studies indicate a trend toward social, cultural, and ethnic diversification, they run the risk of disproportionately privileging one facet of diversity over others within a much larger transformation process. We argue that movements of people and the dissemination of ideas across regional boundaries and social media platforms, and the way that (im-)material cultural elements have become part of the social fabric of evolving gender roles and identity politics, new lifestyles and social alliances challenge narrow interpretations of diversity. “Increasing diversity” is not unidirectional, but a process that is multi-layered, multi-directional, and sometimes contradictory. It can produce new forms of segregation, restrict or force the movements of some groups, or cause/lead to counter-movements against various facets of diversity.

Against this background, this panel shifts the focus from diversity to interversity – an innovative and critical conceptualization of social diversities developed by the Vienna School of Japanese Studies. Papers within this section are therefore united by the common interest in the interplay and intersectionality of otherness and how features of differentiation, either in isolation or in interrelatedness, are creating, reinforcing, or offsetting subjectivities, positionalities, and agency within the social hierarchy of a changing Japan.

Heißenberger situates transgender literary characters within their historical and socio-political contexts, thereby tracing how the diversification of their portrayal reflects real-world developments in policy-making and public discourse. Malzahn investigates how the ongoing diversification of gender roles and the simultaneous persistence of traditional gender norms in families and the workplace effect male views on love and romantic relationships. Manzenreiter draws from original survey data to analyze how subjective loneliness affects attitudes towards various facets of social diversity.

Together with findings and arguments from the Interversity panel 2, these studies substantiate in theory and practice the claim that interversity in Japan is comprised of multiple categories of otherness and their intersecting and interrelated features.

Abstract in Japanese (if needed)

Accepted papers