T0061


Scaling the vertical empire: Imperial Japan’s mountains 
Convenor:
Lisa Yoshikawa (Hobart and William Smith Colleges)
Send message to Convenor
Chair:
Chris Tsui Shuen Lau (University of Tübingen)
Discussant:
Miriam Kadia (University of Colorado Boulder)
Format:
Panel
Section:
History

Short Abstract

This panel scrutinizes the attempts in Imperial Japan to appropriate the empire’s mountains and their altitudinal and geological frameworks to assert Japanese dominance over colonial subjects by contesting, hence revealing, alternate perspectives on such landscapes.

Long Abstract

The Japanese empire’s expansion was altitudinal in addition to being latitudinal and longitudinal, marked by conquests of terrestrial mountains that manifested its territories’ third dimension and hosted diverse resources, cultures, and peoples. Twentieth century Japanese colonizers in frontiers initiated these vertical acquisitions in conversation with the counterparts located within the empire’s core regions, such as the Japanese Alps, that were reimagined with references to their European models. The resulting conceptualizations and relationships affirmed Japanese dominance over the multi-dimensional empire, yet exposed competing visions that challenged attempts to create master narratives. The three papers in this panel introduce shifting debates over various peaks, between the 1900s to the 1940s, and how ultimately, they were scaled both literally and figuratively to justify Japanese imperialism and colonialism.

The first paper explores Hokkaidō’s highest peak Asahidake and the diverse Japanese settler imaginations of the peak between the 1900s–1920s to entice immigration, enhance tourism, and elevate nationalism. In the process of colonizing the mountain, the settlers undermined Ainu metaphysical relationship with it, yet simultaneously attempted to center Asahidake in competition with the empire’s more prominent ridges like the Japanese Alps. The second paper examines the empire’s two highest mountains, Taiwan’s Niitaka and Tsugitaka, as sketched in the 1920s–1930s by the polymath Kano Tadao who researched the alpine regions and their inhabitants. Kano’s relationship with the regions’ aborigines led him to incorporate their view of the ranges in addition to his zoogeographical studies, thereby challenging any absolute imaginary of these mountains, albeit as an apologist for the empire. The third paper considers Japanese university mountaineering clubs and their colonial treks in insular and continental destinations and even in the Himalayas, as agents of imperialism by the 1930s¬–1940s. Backed by the empire’s military, infrastructure, sponsors, and colonial labor, these brokers routinely and creatively elevated metropolitan peaks and preached diligence, sacrifice, and conformity to the Imperial dogma.

Together, these papers argue that mountains served as a critical spatial framework for understanding Japanese colonialism, reflecting a worldview that prioritized science over uncharted wilderness and civilization over untamed populations, as colonizers integrated mountains into Japanese cultural radar.

Abstract in Japanese (if needed)

Accepted papers