T0039


Governance in Japan: Revisiting the Foucauldian Frameworks of Power and Knowledge Through Case Studies in Health Care and Language Education 
Convenors:
Stephanie Assmann-Terada (University of Hyogo)
Isabel Fassbender (Kansai Gaidai University)
Send message to Convenors
Chair:
Stephanie Assmann-Terada (University of Hyogo)
Discussant:
Paul Johann Kramer (Japan-Center LMU Munich)
Format:
Panel
Section:
Politics and International Relations

Short Abstract

By assessing governance tools in Japan ranging from informal recommendations to legal frameworks, this panel illustrates the ambiguity of governance in diverse areas such as linguistics and health/reproductive care while assessing the limitations of the Foucauldian frameworks of knowledge and power.

Long Abstract

By assessing various governance tools, ranging from informal recommendations to legal frameworks, this panel illustrates the fluidity of governance in present-day Japan while critically assessing the limitations of the Foucauldian frameworks of knowledge and power.

Drawing upon public health-related policies regarding nutrition education, secondhand smoke prevention, containment of COVID-19, and regulations of wearing bicycle helmets, the first paper assesses the intersections between informal recommendations and regulatory frameworks to unravel the dichotomy between "hard" and "soft" governance. In a similar vein, the second paper examines the objectives of food governance under the Shokuiku (Food Education) Law, enacted in 2005. Different interpretations of this law range from formal nutrition education through institutionalized school lunch programs to enable children to develop food literacy, to softer forms of governance in declining areas that seek to inspire intergenerational conviviality and resilience by enhancing food literacy among mature citizens and young mothers.

A more ambiguous example is Japan's approach to reproductive technologies such as surrogacy and egg donation. Despite the Japanese Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology's opposition to these technologies, the government has neither legalized nor prohibited these practices. Taking advantage of this fluid situation, which oscillates between pronatalism and neoliberal discourses of responsibility, transnational agencies offer reproductive services to the Japanese public. The third paper identifies the key agencies and presents preliminary findings from interviews with individuals who utilize or contemplate utilizing these reproductive technologies.

By critically assessing the Foucauldian notion that discourse constitutes reality, the fourth paper shifts the focus from health governance to linguistics. Applying an analysis of Japanese English Foreign Language students' comprehension of de-sexed terminology in English, this paper illustrates that neoliberal governmentality extends to linguistic subjects. Oscillating between state-sanctioned language use and self-imposed governance, this paper assesses whether de-sexed language may result in neocolonial hierarchies of linguistic authority.

Abstract in Japanese (if needed)

Accepted papers