Click the star to add/remove an item to/from your individual schedule.
You need to be logged in to avail of this functionality.

LitPre12


has 1 film 1
The Genji, its Author, and her Patron: The Strategies of Murasaki and Fujiwara no Michinaga 
Convenors:
Hiroshi Yokomizo (Tohoku University)
Carolina Negri (Ca' Foscari University of Venice)
Satoko Nakanishi (National Institute of Japanese Literature)
Send message to Convenors
Section:
Pre-modern Literature
Sessions:
Wednesday 25 August, -
Time zone: Europe/Brussels

Short Abstract:

Given Murasaki Shikibu's status as an artist, much research on the Tale of Genji has focused on her intentions. This panel instead orients itself around relationships between her and her patron, Fujiwara no Michinaga, as a framework from which to explore the text's production and circulation anew.

Long Abstract:

The fame of Murasaki Shikibu as an artist owes much, it hardly needs saying, to the international renown of the Tale of Genji as a masterpiece of world literature. Reflecting the privileged status thus accorded to her, much research on the Tale to date has found its significance in the interpretation of Murasaki's own intentions, as they surround the text throughout. In recent years, however, amidst a growing interest in the cultural sphere that produced the Genji, it has gradually become clear that for the understanding of such a work, facile interpretive schemata wherein "(average) readers" face "(transcendent artist) Murasaki Shikibu" are woefully insufficient.

This panel, in contrast, orients itself around the real-world relationships between Murasaki Shikibu and Fujiwara no Michinaga, as an alternative framework from which to explore the text's production and circulation anew. For hovering ever half-visibly in the background to the work's production lie the purposes of its patron, Fujiwara no Michinaga, making it possible to see the Tale of Genji as the textual realization of those purposes, wrought skillfully in writing through Murasaki Shikibu's abundant craft. The Genji was, after all, both created for and presented to the limited cultural sphere around Michinaga's own family clan. Indeed, given such a situation even the premises of "author" and "reader" seem in need of re-conception.

These issues are also linked to the problem of how the Genji circulated. Under what expectations of readership, ultimately, had it been created? Addressing such questions, collectively the three panelists seek to decode the relationship between the literary work of the Tale of Genji and the larger literary sphere—literary "field"—within which it came into being. Extending their investigations beyond the Tale itself, they take into account other works like the Diary of Murasaki Shikibu, and various private poetry collections. Each separately the panelists draw out the Tale of Genji's potential political aspects, amid the larger context of Fujiwara no Michinaga's patronage, revealing in detail the respective strategies of Michinaga and Murasaki that underlay the manner in which the Tale of Genji came to be written, and read.

Accepted papers:

Session 1 Wednesday 25 August, 2021, -