Click the star to add/remove an item to/from your individual schedule.
You need to be logged in to avail of this functionality.
Log in
- Convenor:
-
Janine Tasca Sawada
(Brown University)
Send message to Convenor
- Chair:
-
Paul Swanson
(Nanzan University)
- Discussant:
-
Makoto Hayashi
(Aichigakuin University)
- Stream:
- Religion and Religious Thought
- Location:
- Torre A, Piso 0, Sala 02
- Sessions:
- Thursday 31 August, -
Time zone: Europe/Lisbon
Short Abstract:
This panel demonstrates that in response to anti-Buddhist sentiments and the perceived threat of Christianity, already in the late Edo period Buddhist activists began to argue vigourously in defense of their religion and that they further developed these apologetical strategies in the Meiji period.
Long Abstract:
It is well known that the implementation of policies to downgrade the status of Buddhist institutions and clergy after the Meiji Restoration led to a range of efforts to rehabilitate and even reinvent Buddhism as the country entered the modern period, such as intersectarian organization, lay outreach, and educational innovation. This panel suggests that Buddhist spokespersons were already responding pre-emptively to anti-Buddhist rhetoric in the late Tokugawa period and that they actively built on these efforts to "defend the Dharma" (gohō) as they negotiated the challenging political and cultural circumstances of the Meiji period.
During the Bakumatsu era Buddhist representatives were preoccupied with the intensifying Confucian and Nativist critiques of their religion, but at the same time they were keenly aware of the impending challenge of Christianity and Western culture. Orion Klautau demonstrates in his paper that by the 1850s Jōdo Shinshū priests were already "defending the Dharma" in anticipation of foreign incursions, both military and religious; their arguments ranged from justifying Buddhist participation in national defense to the need for priests to learn about Christianity in order to counter its challenge. Janine Sawada's paper suggests that the Bakumatsu apologetical treatise, Zenkai ichiran, ostensibly meant to convince Confucian critics of the truth of Buddhism, later served the educational needs of Zen Buddhists as they faced the new realities of the Meiji order. In his paper Hoshino Seiji analyzes the further evolution of Buddhist apologetics in Japan, focusing especially on the speech and promotional activities of the intersectarian association, Wakeikai, in response to the growing presence of Christianity in Japan in the 1880s. While the Shin, Rinzai and other Buddhist activists discussed in these papers differed in their aims and audiences across the long nineteenth century, they invariably relied on time-honoured Buddhist rhetorical strategies to persuade their critics and ultimately the public at large of the superiority of Buddhism vis-à-vis other religious teachings, and of its applicability to the pressing problems of emerging modern Japan.
Accepted papers:
Session 1 Thursday 31 August, 2017, -Paper short abstract:
Imakita Kōsen (1816-1892) defended Zen Buddhism against its Confucian critics in the Bakumatsu era by interpreting classical Chinese texts from a Buddhist perspective in his Zenkai ichiran. His commentaries suggest that this type of "gohōron" 護法論 reinterprets the Dharma even as it justifies it.
Paper long abstract:
As the Tokugawa period drew to a close, an up-and-coming Rinzai Zen master, Imakita Kōsen 今北洪川 (1816-1892), took advantage of a long tradition of preaching Buddhist ideas by "translating" them into the dominant intellectual discourse of the time. In the face of the increasingly intense Confucian polemics against Buddhism that circulated in Japan in the Bakumatsu era, he composed a book-length treatise in which he creatively reinterpreted thirty classical Confucian passages from a Zen Buddhist perspective. Imakita drew inspiration for this work, titled Zenkai ichiran 禅海一瀾 (A Ripple in the Sea of Zen), from a trove of "defense of the Dharma" literature (gohōron 護法論) that dated back to the golden age of Confucian-Buddhist intellectual exchange in Northern Song China (960-1127).
The notion of apologetics, which was originally informed by ancient Mediterranean and especially Christian conceptions of a formal defense of one's views in writing (apologia), is often used to characterize this genre of Buddhist literature. Zenkai ichiran was in fact directed at the Confucian scholars and government officials of Iwakuni domain, where he lived at the time of the writing (1862). However, lectures on Imakita's masterpiece later became a component of Rinzai Zen outreach in his lineage (represented most notably by Shaku Sōen 釈宗演, 1860-1919). In my presentation, after reviewing the idea of apologetics I will highlight representative selections from Zenkai ichiran with an eye to determining how the book may have anticipated the interests of its changing readership during the nineteenth century, evolving in function from a formal defense of Buddhist ideas to a call to members of the Zen community to reassess their understanding of their religious mission in modern Japan. The example of Zenkai ichiran suggests that "gohōron" reinterprets the Dharma even as it justifies it.
Paper short abstract:
This presentation focuses on the apologetic discourses of Gesshō (1817-1858) and Ryūon (1800-1885) in the context of Bakumatsu Japan. This paper aims to show how their ideas contained, at their core, the seeds of the modernization process which was to come after restoration days.
Paper long abstract:
In recent years, several works have described how the transplantation of the so-called "western" concept of religion to Japan, which started during the Bakumatsu period, caused the intelligentsia to reconsider their identity in terms of both belief and practice. By then Buddhism was already, however, in the midst of (re)asserting its domain vis-à-vis other schools of thought such as Nativism and Kobunjigaku. Nevertheless, it is true that the renewed "threat" of Christianity brought about by the opening of a number of ports in the late 1850s did take this process of self-examination to a new level. This can be observed in the production of several treatises aimed at "defending the Dharma" (gohō 護法) against its enemies. In order to gain further insight into this critical moment of religious history, this presentation focuses on the discourses of Gesshō 月性 (1817-1858) and Ryūon 龍温 (1800-1885) in Bakumatsu Japan. Belonging, respectively, to the Nishi and Higashi denominations of Shinshū, these priests adopted somewhat different strategies for defending Buddhist institutions against the foreign peril. In 1853 Gesshō drafted Naikai Kiyū 内海杞憂, a petition to the lord of Chōshū domain in which he made five proposals aimed at defending the nation through Buddhism. These included, for instance, the fostering, both material and spiritual, of peasant militias, a suggestion that was later given shape by the anti-Bakufu alliance. Gesshō's Buppō Gokokuron 仏法護国論 was distributed to temples throughout the country, influencing a whole generation of priests that were about to take part in the events surrounding the Meiji Restoration. Ryūon, in turn, was an important scholar-priest of his day and, in his own manner, also impacted the ways young Buddhists related not only to Christianity but, in broader terms, to "western" knowledge itself. By 1863 he had proposed, for instance, that anti-Christian critiques should be based on a solid understanding of the Bible. This paper aims to show how the discourses put forward by these priests contained, at their core, the seeds of the modernization process which was to come after restoration days.
Paper short abstract:
In this paper, I will focus on the activities of Buddhist associations in Japan in the 1880s. They held Buddhist Speech meetings and some speeches were written down and published. I will consider the strategies observed in their narratives in relation to the idea of "defending the Dharma."
Paper long abstract:
While the study on modern Buddhism in Japan has recently progressed, the period around 1880 is still understudied. Although it has been pointed out that numerous Buddhist associations (kessha 結社) were established throughout the 1880s, their activities as well as their narratives have not been well examined. In this presentation, I will focus on their strategies in relation to the idea of "defending the Dharma" (goho 護法).
Those Buddhist associations during that period were strongly connected with the anti-Christian (haiya 排耶) campaign. Many lay Buddhists and monks actively engaged in the campaign, and published and circulated haiya literature. This literature was conventionally interpreted as a repetition of the preceding anti-Christian arguments of early modern Japan and not examined seriously.
Although the logic in this literature seems similar, changes in the social environment must be noted. First, Buddhists, who had experienced the separation of Shinto and Buddhism, were forced to compete with Christians whose activities became more visible in the 1880s after the Meiji government hesitantly lifted the ban in 1873. It also meant that Buddhists encountered actual Christians rather than imaginary Christianity and faced Christian apologetics against Buddhism. Next, Buddhists were also required to make apologetics to the people outside of Buddhist society. At that point, Buddhists needed to explain Buddhism in a non-Buddhist language in non-traditional form.
To consider Buddhist literature under such a context, I will focus on the activities of Wakeikai (和敬会) and Buddhist speech (Bukkyo enzetsu 仏教演説) during this period. Wakeikai is a pioneer intersectarian Buddhist association founded in Tokyo in 1879, followed by the establishment of many local branches. It became an influential model for other Buddhist associations. Being one of the earliest advocates of Buddhist speech, Wakeikai held Buddhist speech meetings regularly, and sent speakers to its branches and other Buddhist associations. Even though Buddhist speech, either by Wakeikai or others, was orally presented as "speech," some presentations were written down, published in Buddhist journals, and circulated among Buddhist, Christian, and secular intellectuals. I will consider the various strategies behind these Buddhist speeches.