Click the star to add/remove an item to/from your individual schedule.
You need to be logged in to avail of this functionality.
Log in
- Convenors:
-
Pooja Jain-Grégoire
(Sciences Po Paris)
Peter Taylor (Institute of Development Studies)
Send message to Convenors
- Format:
- Paper panel
- Stream:
- Decolonization and knowledge production
- Location:
- 8W 2.8, 8West Building
- Sessions:
- Friday 27 June, -
Time zone: Europe/London
Short Abstract
There is a crisis of commitment to tackling climate change, with a trust deficit in multilateralism in climate-linked development aid. Through a decolonisation lens, the panel will offer perspectives on potentials for creating a broad coalition of the most-affected across the global south and north.
Description
The panel seeks to address the crisis in commitment to tackling climate change and its effects on development finance and the debate on adaptation vs mitigation. Papers presented will seek to analyse the trust deficit in multilateralism and collective action in the field of climate-linked development aid, through a decolonisation lens. The most compelling narratives in an era of increasing uncertainty, as typified by climate change, are shaped by multiple perspectives and different forms and expressions of knowledge, and by working in a spirit of inclusion and in participatory ways. Whilst multilateralism implies a collective agenda, there are many forms of knowledge and experience in this arena that are neither heard nor valued. Digital advances, whilst bringing opportunities for information sharing, tend to create further barriers and constraints for populations excluded from their design and use. Artificial intelligence infrastructure housed in the global north is also a growing source of carbon emissions, creating new forms of climate colonialism. By drawing on experiences of bringing different perspectives and forms of knowledge to bear, the panel will explore potentials and opportunities for creating a broad, inclusive coalition of the most-affected across the global south and north. We invite papers offering inter-disciplinary case studies addressing the link between climate aid and the digital divide. In line with claims of epistemic justice, combined with distributive justice and reparations for past emissions, we will explore the potentials for decolonising the future of climate finance.
Accepted paper
Session 1 Friday 27 June, 2025, -Paper short abstract
This paper presents a case study of a new modality for climate finance that brings together actors from different regions. This new approach is conceptualised by the Global North, funded by a resource-rich middle power, and targeting the Global South.
Paper long abstract
Current debates on climate finance centre around a disparity in thinking between the Global North and South. The Global South demands more financial support for climate adaptation and mitigation, emphasising that developed nations, historically responsible for most emissions, should shoulder the financial burden. The Global North, barely acknowledging responsibility, is reneging on earlier promises of large-scale funding, citing concerns over accountability and the potential misuse of funds. The Global South also emphasizes the need for debt relief and climate justice, while the North is prioritising market-driven solutions and private sector involvement in funding climate initiatives. In this context, an initiative is currently being developed to create a new climate finance mechanism that will allegedly address a gaping hole in current finance flows: finance for conflict-affected and conflict-prone regions in the Global South. The new mechanism was conceptualised by a Global North actor tailored for and targeting a resource-rich middle power for funding. Using participant observation, this paper presents the development of this mechanism as an example of the importance of the positionality of actors in creating narratives for climate finance and the centrality of North-South relations in determining which narratives of global problems and solutions are adopted and gain momentum. While the final form of the mechanism is similar to those adopted by other organisations operating in this space, the actors involved and the process of creating the mechanism are unique and deserve attention.