Paper short abstract:

This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the extent and nature of actions undertaken by Northern and Southern NGOs to tackle power asymmetries, explicitly comparing their understandings, perspectives, and initiatives.

Paper long abstract:

This paper examines the extent and nature of actions undertaken by Northern and Southern NGOs to tackle power asymmetries, explicitly comparing their understandings, perspectives, and initiatives. The research draws upon (a) a global survey that collected 458 responses to explore localisation initiatives, (b) a range of 33 stakeholder interviews conducted across Europe, Ghana, and Uganda to understand perspectives on localisation, local-led development, and power shifts, and (c) three in-depth case studies in Ghana and Uganda that delved into programmes addressing power imbalances between Northern and Southern NGOs.

The study finds that despite efforts to address power imbalances, progress has been slow and limited. Actions have been taken in areas such as policy, programming, funding, and language, but the most significant steps have been in programming and funding. Southern NGOs are gaining more influence at the programmatic level, but they struggle to impact the broader policy framework. Northern NGOs are often seen as the dominant force in addressing power imbalances. Challenges include a lack of time, resources, and fear of change. In addition, Southern NGOs feel their voices are not heard and their agendas may be co-opted by Northern NGOs. The question is whether merely being "good partners" is enough to bring about real change in the North-South power dynamic. The study emphasises the need for systemic change involving institutional donors. A call for deeper, more transformative, and Southern-led change is made, focusing on reconfiguring the broader framework in which aid operates.