Click the star to add/remove an item to/from your individual schedule.
You need to be logged in to avail of this functionality.
Log in
- Convenors:
-
Rose Pinnington
(King's College London)
Maia King (King's College London)
Send message to Convenors
- Formats:
- Papers
- Stream:
- Global methodologies
- Sessions:
- Friday 2 July, -
Time zone: Europe/London
Short Abstract:
This panel will bring together researchers who are engaging with questions of power and agency in development practice, in order to promote scholarly exchange about the different methodological, conceptual and analytical approaches that can be applied in research of this kind.
Long Abstract:
There has been extensive research on how aid and development practices can be harmful to local institutions and decision-making processes, as well as increasing calls to 'localise' development and shift power to local actors. There has been less rigorous examination of how problematic power differentials in development might be overcome, in order to enhance 'local agency'. In the studies and policy responses that do exist, there are also multiple views on what constitutes 'local agency', and how it can be measured. For instance, the 'partnership' agenda, which arose in the late 1990s, has been widely critiqued for its narrow and technocratic interpretation of 'ownership'. This has led to increasing efforts to understand the political dimensions of ownership expressed, for instance, in concepts of 'developmental leadership' and 'politically smart, locally led' aid.
This panel welcomes papers that explore questions of power and agency in donor funded programmes and development practice more broadly. It will address:
1) different approaches to conceptualising and theorising power and agency in research on development practice;
2) questions of language and discourse (e.g. what is the role of language in outcomes of relative power?)
3) whose perspectives do we encounter, or risk prioritising, when we make decisions about methods and approaches (e.g. data collection; units of analysis)?
4) the role of the researcher: how does the researcher encounter and affect power relations in the practice of development research?
The panel will aim to strengthen efforts to explore how local agency can be understood, facilitated and advanced in development thinking and practice.
Accepted papers:
Session 1 Friday 2 July, 2021, -Paper short abstract:
This paper explores from a philosophical perspective the interrelation between institutions power discourses and real freedoms of agency based on the Capabilities Approach (Sen, 2009) relates it with Institutional Ethnography (Smith, 2005) focusing on marginal adolescents case in Bogotá/Colombia.
Paper long abstract:
Development is people-centred. Human development depends on fair social and economic institutions. The fair consists of the removal of various types of unfreedoms that leave people with little opportunity of exercising their reasoned agency (Sen, 1999). Different scholars (Berger and Luckmann, 2006; Bauman, 2013; Sen, 1999; Smith, 2005) have insisted on pointing out the dual constraining and enabling role that institutions play in shaping people's lives in ways that don´t necessarily respond to their best interests and that tend to eliminate the expansion of the real freedoms of agency to decide on how to live their own lives (Sen, 1999). People's lives are caught up in institutional processes mediated by organising power discourses as materially replicable objects that carry messages (Smith, 2014) to organise people's everyday lives (Murray, 2020). This research to explore the interrelation between institutions power discourses and the people´ real freedoms of agency, with special emphasis on knowing (i) how subjects navigate between different institutional abstracted discourses, (ii) how institutional processes shape and limit the development of their real freedoms agency and (iii) how institutions power discourses can have an unfair impact on the development of subjects. I focus on real freedom agency concept based on Capabilities Approach theory (Amartya Sen, 2009) and relate it with Institutional Ethnography (Dorothy Smith, 2005) as an empirical method, influence by Marx theory, focusing on a marginal adolescent group in Bogotá-Colombia, exploring connections among local agency settings of their everyday lives (experience), institutional discourses (power language), and translocal agency (ruling relations).
Paper short abstract:
Can space applications bring outcomes of inclusive development for project beneficiaries? To answer this question, this work in progress paper uses the lens of inclusive innovation to conceptualise and evaluate power relations in space projects funded by the UK government's Official Development Assistance budget.
Paper long abstract:
Applications of space technologies in donor-funded international development projects are emerging, such as the use of remote sensing data to predict malaria outbreaks or plan for disasters. Space projects often work within the framework of the Sustainable Development Goals, which have been questioned over their ability to engage with power relations between stakeholders. When implemented, space projects could widen relational power inequalities for those excluded from the benefits of space applications through more powerful stakeholders retaining the ability to control technological resources. Furthermore, external space applications designed for local problems can centre epistemologies of the Global North while displacing marginalised communities’ knowledges. These issues call for a need to analyse power relations between participating stakeholders in space projects. This work in progress paper uses the lens of inclusive innovation to conceptualise power relations between stakeholders in space projects and evaluate whether they could bring outcomes of inclusive development for project beneficiaries, such as redistributing power over resources and recognising multiple knowledges. Space projects in the International Partnership Programme (IPP) will be evaluated, which is led by the UK Space Agency and funded by the UK government’s Official Development Assistance budget. Data collection methods include participant observation and semi-structured interviews with project members and beneficiaries. Preliminary findings indicate that volatile funding resources pose significant barriers to inclusive development. These findings could bring improved insights into if and how space projects can be governed to support inclusive development and social justice for those excluded from the benefits of space applications.
Paper short abstract:
I draw on a new oral history archive of women in public service in Pakistan, launched in 2020 by Dr Sana Haroon (UMass), to critique donor led initiatives to 'empower women' in the public sector by centring the lived experiences, power, and agency of women bureaucrats in development practice.
Paper long abstract:
The development sector has been invested in gender mainstreaming and understanding the effects of gendered institutions and practices on policy making and implementation for some time. Specifically, development agencies have pushed for women to be employed as public servants so they could contribute to designing and implementing government services, arguing that this would improve gender sensitivity and responsiveness of public policy. Much of this work on women in public service is grounded in the Sustainable Development Goals and other international agreements such as CEDAW. However, Nazneen, Hossain, and Chopra (2019) argue that women’s empowerment has become “a ‘saccharine’ concept” in international development, completely devoid of its political grounding. In this paper, I draw on a new oral history archive of women’s experiences in public service in Pakistan, launched in 2020 at the Lahore University of Management Sciences by Dr Sana Haroon (UMass), to question donor led initiatives to "empower women" in the public sector by centring the experiences of women public servants themselves in development practice and leadership. In doing so, this paper outlines the inequalities and oppressions women bureaucrats face in doing their work, and the strategies and networks they develop to be able to exercise some power and agency in a male dominated environment. In particular, I focus on notions of professionalism and persistence, networking and exclusion, and mentorship and alienation. By centring the lived experience of women in public service, this paper promotes local knowledge and understanding of development practice.
Paper short abstract:
Integrated watershed management programs foster rural development in dryland areas. In drought affected Bundelkhand, India, post-implementation lessons show that social dimensions like gender and caste need to be considered in the designing phase to address pre-existing socio-economic inequalities.
Paper long abstract:
More than $14 billion have been invested over two decades in India for integrated watershed management programs. This has addressed issues like water scarcity and environmental degradation, improving groundwater availability, better crop and livestock productivity, and sustainable crop intensification across water-scare ecosystems in the country. Yet, heterogenous local societies divided on the lines of class, caste, and gender inhibit equitable access and distribution of program benefits such as water for drinking and agriculture, grazing lands and forest-based resources. We present evidence using mixed-methods data from rural Bundelkhand to interrogate the importance of gender and social inclusion in ensuring environmental justice in natural resource management activities such as integrated watershed management. Bundelkhand region in Central India has been plagued by acute water scarcity resulting in distress migration, loss of agriculture-based livelihoods and increased burden of water collection on women in the community. Micro-level experience from an integrated watershed project in the region shows that women and marginalized social groups get limited benefits in the presence of caste and patriarchal context. Inclusion of local community in the planning and implementation phase is essential to address gender and caste-based inequities that might result in loss of income and increased time poverty for some social groups. We reason that donor agencies and implementation partners need to be attuned to the social context while leveraging support from local community to ensure successful implementation of integrated watershed programs. Such programs can bring about social transformation only if they focus on both environmental and social sustainability concerns.