Click the star to add/remove an item to/from your individual schedule.
You need to be logged in to avail of this functionality.
Log in
- Convenors:
-
Charlotte Bruckermann
(University of Cologne)
Susanne Brandtstädter (University of Cologne)
Send message to Convenors
- Format:
- Workshop
- Transfers:
- Closed for transfers
- Location:
- Seminargebäude S11
- Sessions:
- Thursday 2 October, -, -
Time zone: Europe/Berlin
Short Abstract
Our panel invites participants to reflect on the relationship between commoning value (sharing resources for living well) and common values (sharing a notion of the good), and what it means to hold these “in common” - beyond projections of sameness and difference.
Long Abstract
Our panel invites participants to reflect on the relationship between commoning value (sharing resources for living well) and common values (sharing a notion of the good), and what it means to hold these “in common.” Sylvia Federici’s assertion that “there are no commons without a community” emphasizes that commons are not just shared resources but deeply relational: dependent on collective action and rooted in care, mutual aid, and regeneration. David Graeber’s theory of value highlights that a diversity of values arise in human (inter)action and manifest their importance in relation to desired futures. While the concept of community can elide the hierarchies, inequalities, exclusions, and the suppression of difference, an emphasis on differentiation may also replicate, and re-scale, a problematic sense of sameness – whether of values, ontology, identity or positionality. In both approaches, commoning values involves social processes by which value and values, sameness and difference, what is common and what is “uncommon,” are generated at the same time.
We suggest that envisioning “new commons” as an emancipatory, resistive social practice also demands interrogating forms of value generation rooted in projections of sameness and difference. Instead of taking “the new commons” as project for re-scaling the circulation of values, we ask:
How may values be generated or held “in common” without resorting to equivocations and divisions? How may common values and what is commonly valued emerge as the basis of new solidarities, and defy appropriations by state or market?
Our panel welcomes papers addressing these issues empirically and/or theoretically.
Accepted contributions
Session 1 Thursday 2 October, 2025, -Contribution short abstract
The Partition of India in 1947 resulted in a massive influx of refugees in both India and Pakistan. Following partition, thousands of East Bengali Hindu refugees left their homes in East Bengal/Pakistan and migrated to Kolkata, West Bengal.
Contribution long abstract
The refugees fled in destitute conditions, facing profound disruptions in their socio-economic lives. Amid displacement, marginalization, and inadequate government response, refugees engaged in practices of commoning—collaborative and community-driven strategies to reimagine shared resources and social relations. Based on year-long ethnographic research, this paper examines how these practices were shaped by the challenges of displacement, resource sparsity, and cultural and political identity in post-partition Kolkata. It highlights refugees’ solidarity-based efforts to create, sustain, and manage the common good.
Facing inhumane living conditions in the government camps, refugees formed local and central committees and forcefully occupied empty government and privately owned lands, which were later developed into squatter colonies. The refugees organized local cooperative economies and collectively fought for access to essential services like water, healthcare and education. Women, often excluded from formal decision-making processes, contributed massively to fostering community ties and sharing the labour and resources. Nevertheless, the practices of commoning did not take place without internal conflicts as tension arose around caste, class and gender inequalities. This paper explores how the communities navigated these conflicts, revealing the complex intersection between solidarity, equality, and contestation in building communal life within the squatter colonies.
By Situating these practices within the broader theoretical framework of commoning, my paper examines how the East Bengali Hindu refugees addressed the dual imperatives of survival and solidarity. The paper argues that commoning among the refugee communities was not merely a pragmatic response to scarcity but also a political act of asserting collective agency against multilayered marginalization.
Contribution short abstract
This paper examines the dynamic between common(ing) values and common values in the Catholic Church taking canon law students’ paths from the Global South to Rome and back as an empirical example to discuss how values are (re)generated within the oldest global bureaucracy.
Contribution long abstract
Throughout its history, the Catholic Church has cultivated various forms of common(ing) both material and ideological values, including monastic life, church taxation, and welfare missions. One reason cited for the Church’s enduring presence as a global organization, despite being one of the most controversial institutions of our time, is its practice of inculturation. This enables the Church to maintain core values globally, even amid diverse cultural contexts, by integrating others within its “paternalistic fold” (Norget 2009: 342). The presentation explores the dynamic interplay between common(ing) values and shared values within the Catholic Church, drawing on fieldwork conducted among nuns, monks, and priests from the Global South who are send by their superiors to Rome to study canon law. This education equips them for leadership positions within the Church’s administration, mainly in their home countries. The paper investigates to what extent the internationalization of canon law students in Rome over the past three decades has contributed to a form of common(ing) church property and examines how these processes contribute to the (re)creation of shared values that hold the global Catholic Church together in the twenty-first century.
Contribution short abstract
Fragrant oil-bearing rose in Isparta is central for commoning discourses for local imaginations, for sharing common concerns and a future of sustainable value for the community. The commoning narratives nevertheless display tensions between rural growers-urban processors and local-global players.
Contribution long abstract
Rosa Damascena (fragrant oil-bearing rose) is considered a local agricultural resource in Isparta, Türkiye. It is used for extracting the valuable rose oil, rose water and other rose products, essential for global and national cosmetics and health industries. The local firms compete with one another for buying most of the rose harvest from rose growers, yet at the same time worry about the global price of rose oil, that they will not be able to sell their produce. The local actors within this global chain of rose growers in Isparta to local companies processing rose oil have to common their valuation of the rose and rose oil, yet downplay the competition concerning the prices and harvest. This paper discusses how the local discourse tries to solve this tension between growth, price and value through narratives of commoning the value for the community, the future of Isparta’s rose and the need for sustaining the local wealth, ecology and rural population. It shows how various actors emphasise the common values and partly downplay the ecological degradation and competition for the harvest.
Contribution short abstract
Karakul sheep farming no longer works as a means for economic value generation. Alternative modes of valuation gain importance in reproducing the community of Karakul farmers but still depend on economic value. As a result, dissonances and frictions between different values and valuations emerge.
Contribution long abstract
How do farmers derive value from their activities at a historical moment when economic value generation from farming is failing? Based on ethnographic fieldwork among Karakul sheep farmers in Namibia, I argue that in the economic crisis situation, alternative modes of valuation gain importance, not only as individual motivations but also as a means for the community of Karakul farmers to reproduce itself. This community is haunted by its colonial past, its complicity with colonialism and apartheid and by its potential disappearance in the near future.
Karakul stud ram auctions are community events and valuation arenas, in which the shared quality criteria of what sheep are good sheep for breeding are translated into economic value, into cash. Building on Nancy Munn’s concept of value as relational, I examine the emerging frictions between different scales of valuation through the example of stud auctions.
In the Karakul industry, the relations of price and value, economic value and meaning-making value are complex. Economic gain by itself does not explain why people still farm with Karakul. However, Karakul sheep farming will no longer exist as the industry and the farming community it is today if it is not able to generate at least some form of economic value. The result is increasing friction between different forms of valuation and a feeling of dissonance among farmers.
Contribution short abstract
In China, migrant factory workers excluded from formal social benefits join membership-based associations—neither unions nor charities—seeking side hustles and community support. These market-driven networks foster solidarity while risking the commodification of collective care.
Contribution long abstract
Migrant factory workers in contemporary China often find themselves navigating limited social welfare provisions and the privatization of social responsibilities. In response, many turn to membership-based associations that are neither formal unions nor purely charitable organizations, but market actors stressing side hustles, alternative incomes, and entrepreneurial ventures. These associations help workers forge meaningful connections and build informal support systems in the face of precarious factory work and exclusion from state-run benefits—particularly pronounced for those on flexible contracts.
By pooling resources, arranging group discounts, and offering training for small-scale business opportunities, these associations fulfill needs that the formal social safety net neglects. They also cultivate an affective engagement grounded in shared hardships, as members unite around their aspirations for improved livelihoods. Yet, even as they enable new forms of solidarity, such associations may appropriate workers’ collective struggles for commercial gain or reinforce hierarchies by favoring those better positioned to invest in side enterprises.
Nevertheless, the sense of community emerging from these market-driven strategies is not inconsequential. Mutual care and peer support become central to workers’ efforts to secure healthcare, housing, and financial security. Such networks can alleviate some of the burdens of alienating factory conditions and social exclusion, while simultaneously exposing the fragility of relying on market-based solutions. Ultimately, this case illustrates how, in China’s industrial zones, migrant workers creatively assemble multiple strategies to cope with systemic neglect—revealing the paradoxical interplay between community formation and the commodification of collective care.
Contribution short abstract
Uganda's Karamoja region exemplifies resilience through traditional practices like Etamam. This vital mechanism among Karamojong pastoralists illustrates, reflecting on common values, the importance of sharing resources for living well and upholding a shared notion of the good.
Contribution long abstract
Uganda's Karamoja region, where 61% of the population lives in poverty, exemplifies resilience through traditional practices like Etamam—a vital mechanism among Karamojong pastoralists for negotiating resource access during times of need.
Etamam, meaning "sending the message," has evolved as an institutionalized process to ensure access to critical resources, fostering cooperation and peace among different pastoralist communities. The Kobebe grazing area in Moroto district is a key example, supporting multiple pastoralist groups with its rich resources. The practice of Etamam not only facilitates resource sharing but also strengthens traditional governance and enhances resilience against climatic stresses.
Detailed stories and reflections from pastoralist voices are addressing issues of gender, government interaction, and sustainable development goals.
Reflecting on common values, the practice of Etamam illustrates the importance of sharing resources for living well and upholding a shared notion of the good. These values are held in common, transcending projections of sameness and difference, and fostering a sense of unity and mutual support among diverse communities. By fostering dialogue and negotiation, pastoralist communities in Karamoja showcase resilience and the importance of cooperation in facing environmental and social challenges. This narrative underscores the necessity of established mechanisms like Etamam for managing resource access and mitigating the impacts of climate change, contributing to a broader understanding and support of sustainable pastoralist practices.
The proposed paper would be a result of the partnership of the organisations Karamoja Herders of the Horn (KHH) from Moroto, Uganda and the Institute of Ecology and Action Anthropology (INFOE) from Cologne, Germany.