Send message to Author

Abstract

This paper examines the transformation of the discourse on higher education in Kazakhstan, tracing its evolution from an economically instrumental value toward a broader understanding as a public and societal good. The study explores how the positioning of education within state policy has shifted over time, reflecting changing priorities in governance, development, and nation-building.

The analysis is based on a qualitative review of key strategic and regulatory documents, including state programs, sectoral concepts, and presidential addresses as core agenda-setting texts. Particular attention is given to the Concept for the Development of Higher Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan (2023–2029), as well as earlier policy frameworks, in order to identify discursive shifts in the framing of education. The paper also examines the constitutional foundations of education as a public good, with particular attention to the recent constitutional reforms in Kazakhstan, and analyzes the extent to which these renewed normative commitments are reflected in policy implementation.

The central argument is that Kazakhstan’s education policy reflects a discursive shift without full policy realignment. While official narratives increasingly emphasize the societal and public value dimensions of education, actual policy instruments and governance mechanisms remain largely anchored in economic rationality, efficiency, and labor market responsiveness. This creates a structural tension between declared goals and implemented practices.

By situating this case within broader debates on human capital, public value, and post-Soviet governance transformation, the paper contributes to the literature by demonstrating how discursive change can precede, but not necessarily guarantee, substantive policy transformation. It argues that understanding this gap is critical for assessing the future trajectory of education reforms in transitional contexts.

Send message to Authors

Abstract

Drawing on Olsen’s (2007) institutional dynamics and Christiansen and Lægreid’s (2001) public sector reform frameworks, this paper examines how higher education reforms in Kazakhstan are understood, negotiated, and implemented from the perspective of national-level policymakers. While much of the existing literature on higher education reform focuses on institutional or faculty-level experiences, this study recenters analysis on policymakers as key actors shaping reform trajectories, priorities, and constraints in a highly centralized system.

The study adopts a qualitative case study design (Yin, 2014), based on in-depth interviews with eleven senior policymakers, including former Ministers and Vice Ministers of Education and senior officials and departments’ heads at the Ministry. By foregrounding policymaker narratives, the paper explores how reforms are conceptualized at the system level and how policy intentions interact with entrenched governance structures, legal frameworks and institutional realities.

Findings reveal a persistent tension between Kazakhstan’s ambition to build a globally competitive and innovation-driven higher education system and the enduring legacy of centralized, hierarchical governance rooted in the Soviet past. Policymakers themselves acknowledge that reform implementation is constrained not only by institutional resistance within universities, but also by bureaucratic inertia and risk-averse decision-making within government structures. This dual constraint highlights that barriers to reform are not confined to the institutional level but are embedded within the policy apparatus itself.

Furthermore, policymakers point to significant regional disparities that shape uneven reform outcomes, particularly in regional universities facing infrastructural limitations and difficulties in attracting qualified academic and managerial staff. These insights complicate dominant reform narratives by showing how national policies are mediated, adapted, and sometimes diluted across different local contexts.

The paper argues that understanding reform implementation in post-Soviet contexts requires closer attention to policymakers’ perspectives, as they play a critical role in both enabling and constraining change. The findings highlight a fundamental tension between the normative ideal of participatory, context-sensitive governance and the prevailing state-driven, top-down reform model. This tension raises important questions about the long-term sustainability and effectiveness of recent reforms, including large-scale initiatives such as the expansion of international branch campuses. By centering policymakers as agents of reform, this study contributes to global debates on higher education change by offering empirical insights from a non-Western, post-Soviet context, and by rethinking where agency and constraint are located in reform processes.

Send message to Author

Abstract

The paper examines how media discourse contributes to the construction of legitimacy during institutional reform, focusing on the transformation of the Academy of Sciences in Kazakhstan. Situating the analysis within broader debates on power, knowledge production and post-Soviet institutional change, the study explores how competing representations of the 'old' and 'new' Academy are mobilised in public discourse. The paper draws on a dataset of 30 media publications covering the 2022-2025 reform of the Academy and applies critical discourse analysis (CDA) informed by Teun A. Van Dijk's ideological square. The analysis shows that the pre-reform Academy is frequently portrayed as elitist, opaque, and disconnected from scientific merit, while the reformed institution is constructed as transparent, merit-based, and aligned with national development priorities. The findings suggest that media discourse plays a major role in facilitating a shift from a public-academic model of science toward a state-corporate model, in which scientific institutions are increasingly embedded within governmental and strategic policy frameworks. This transformation reflects broader dynamics in Central Eurasia, where institutional reforms are closely intertwined with questions of political authority, modernisation and control over knowledge production. By linking discourse analysis with institutional change, the paper contributes to (re)thinking Central Eurasia as a space where power is exercised not only through formal policy instruments but also through narrative construction and symbolic reordering. It further highlights the importance of digital and traditional media as arenas in which legitimacy is negotiated and contested during periods of structural transformation. The reform is further interpreted as part of broader transformations in the governance of knowledge production and academic institutions in Kazakhstan, with implications for the autonomy and organisation of the higher education and research system.