Send message to Author

Abstract

Digital sovereignty has emerged as a central concept in contemporary debates on state power, governance, and regulation, particularly in regions undergoing rapid political and economic transformation. In Central Asia, governments increasingly rely on legal frameworks to assert control over digital spaces, data flows, and emerging technologies, reshaping the relationship between the state, market actors, and society. This paper examines Uzbekistan as a case study to analyze how digital sovereignty is constructed and exercised through law as a form of legal and political power.

Since the mid-2010s, Uzbekistan has pursued wide-ranging reforms aimed at digitalization, innovation, and economic liberalization, while simultaneously strengthening regulatory oversight over data governance, digital trade, and information infrastructure. Drawing on an analysis of legislation, policy documents, and regulatory practices, this paper explores how legal instruments are used to balance competing objectives: fostering technological development and foreign investment, maintaining state control over digital spaces, and protecting national interests. Particular attention is paid to data localization requirements, digital platform regulation, and the evolving legal treatment of cross-border data flows.

The paper argues that Uzbekistan’s approach reflects a distinctive model of state-led digital sovereignty, in which law functions not merely as a technical regulatory tool but as a mechanism of power that reconfigures digital spaces and redistributes authority among public and private actors. While formally aligned with global discourses on innovation and digital economy development, these legal reforms also embed strategies of control and governance that are characteristic of broader Central Asian political and legal traditions.

By situating Uzbekistan within the wider context of Central Asia and Central Eurasia, this study contributes to ongoing discussions on how states in the region rethink sovereignty, space, and power in the digital age. The findings highlight the importance of legal frameworks in shaping digital transformation and offer insights into how emerging regulatory models in Central Asia may influence regional governance, digital trade, and state-society relations.

Send message to Author

Abstract

In the context of the digitalization of political communication, public authorities increasingly use social media to inform citizens about electoral processes and to shape public interpretations of institutional reforms. This trend is particularly visible during periods of constitutional and electoral change, when state institutions seek not only to communicate procedural information but also to legitimize reforms in the public sphere.

This paper examines the communication strategies of electoral authorities on social media during constitutional reform processes, focusing on the cases of 2020 Russian constitutional referendum and 2022 Kazakh constitutional referendum. The study analyzes how official accounts of the Central Election Commission of the Russian Federation and the Central Election Commission of the Republic of Kazakhstan construct narratives aimed at explaining and legitimizing institutional reforms.

The research addresses the following question: how do electoral authorities use social media to frame and legitimize electoral and constitutional reforms during periods of institutional change? The paper hypothesizes that electoral authorities primarily rely on informational and procedural frames that present reforms as technical and administrative processes rather than political decisions. It also assumes that communication strategies shift closer to the voting period, placing greater emphasis on citizen participation and the legitimacy of the electoral process.

Methodologically, the study combines qualitative and quantitative content analysis of posts published on official social media accounts of the electoral authorities. The empirical dataset includes posts published in the period preceding and during the reform campaigns, allowing the analysis of dominant themes, legitimation frames, and communication formats used in digital political communication.

By comparing the Russian and Kazakhstani cases, the paper seeks to identify similarities and differences in how electoral institutions frame institutional reforms in digital environments. The findings contribute to the broader discussion on the role of social media in the communication strategies of state institutions and in the public legitimation of political reforms.

Send message to Author

Abstract

This paper examines why digital transformation in Central Asia produces uneven gender-related outcomes despite the growing prominence of inclusion and skills development in official reform agendas. Focusing on Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Turkmenistan, the study explores how state capacity, institutional coordination, and political priorities shape the incorporation of gender concerns into digital reform. Rather than treating women’s digital education as a separate policy field, the paper situates it within broader state-led modernization strategies and asks why gender priorities remain inconsistently embedded across sectors. Drawing on a comparative analysis of national policy documents, digital strategies, education reforms, and gender equality frameworks, the paper argues that uneven digital reform reflects not only differences in administrative resources but also distinct political choices about whose inclusion matters in development. While governments increasingly frame digitalization as a pathway to competitiveness and modernization, gender-sensitive implementation remains fragmented and often secondary. The paper contributes to debates on governance, power, and development in Central Eurasia by showing how digital reforms reveal broader hierarchies of state attention, institutional strength, and social inclusion.