Send message to Authors

Abstract

This article explores how the leadership style of school principals influence on teacher’s job satisfaction in modern Kazakhstan using the example of one public and one private secondary school. Although international research has consistently linked participatory and transformational leadership with positive teacher outcomes, empirical research on how these models function in Kazakhstan's hybrid management system, where centralized government regulation coexists with increased institutional autonomy, is limited. In this study, using a convergent approach using mixed methods, the survey data of 49 teachers (based on an adapted teacher job satisfaction questionnaire) is combined with in-depth semi-structured interviews with two principals and five teachers. Quantitative analysis reveals patterns in aspects such as professional autonomy, recognition, team atmosphere and professional development. A qualitative thematic analysis examines how leadership power is implemented, discussed, and perceived in everyday school practice. I argue that school management in Kazakhstan operates on the basis of a pragmatic hybrid model combining democratic consultation, mutual support, shared responsibility and selective directive control. Teachers report higher job satisfaction when principals actively encourage participation in decision-making, individual professional growth and an atmosphere of trust. In private schools, greater institutional autonomy allows for significant investments in professional development and recognition systems, which contributes to comparatively higher satisfaction in these areas. In public schools, formal consultation procedures and collegial discussions partially compensate for financial difficulties and high administrative burden. However, systemic pressures, especially bureaucratic pressures and limited resources, limit the full impact of leadership practices on teacher well-being. These results call into question the simplistic application of Western models of leadership, demonstrating that power in Kazakhstan is constantly being rethought and reconciled between hierarchical heritage and new norms of participation. This article shows that leadership practices that support autonomy, competence and interconnectedness are key to maintaining teacher motivation in transitional education systems. This research contributes to broader academic discussions within Central Eurasian studies about institutional reforms, management transformation and the daily realities of professional life in the post-Soviet space. It offers an empirical understanding of how educational leadership influences the day-to-day experience of teachers in Kazakhstan.

Send message to Authors

Abstract

This paper investigates lexical convergences between Gawri and Shina, two under-documented Dardic languages spoken in Northern Pakistan. While Dardic languages constitute a significant subgroup of the Indo-Aryan family, their internal relationships remain insufficiently explored (Morgenstierne, 1961; Rönnqvist, 2013). By focusing on Gawri and Shina, this study addresses a critical gap in comparative lexical analysis and contributes to broader debates on language contact, classification, and change in Central Eurasia’s mountainous borderlands.

Using a comparative qualitative approach, the research analyzes everyday semantic domains—kinship, body parts, nature, household objects, numbers, and basic verbs—to identify phonological, semantic, and morphological correspondences. Special attention is given to cognates, borrowings, and local innovations that illuminate historical connections and sociolinguistic influences (Kohistani, 2008; Jacquesson, 2004).

Preliminary findings suggest that Gawri and Shina share a substantial proportion of vocabulary, reflecting both shared ancestry and sustained contact, while also exhibiting divergences shaped by geography and community-specific developments. These results underscore the dynamic interplay between linguistic continuity and innovation in the region.

By situating lexical analysis within the broader context of cultural identity and historical memory, this study highlights the importance of documenting indigenous languages as repositories of collective heritage. It contributes to the conference theme by demonstrating how spaces (mountainous borderlands), societies (linguistic communities), and power (language preservation and identity politics) intersect in shaping Central Eurasia’s linguistic landscape.

Keywords

Lexicon, Dardic languages, Gawri, Shina, language contact, Northern Pakistan

Suggested References

• Morgenstierne, G. (1961). Dardic Languages. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.

• Kohistani, R. (2008). Lexical Sharing of Shina Kohistani and Other Dardic Languages. Archive.org.

• Jacquesson, F. (2004). Les langues indo-iraniennes des Pamirs et de l’Hindou Kouch. Cahiers d’Asie centrale.

• Rönnqvist, H. (2013). Tense and Aspect Systems in Dardic Languages: A Comparative Study. Uppsala University.

• Grierson, G.A. (1919). Specimens of the Dardic or Piśācha Languages. Linguistic Survey of India.

Send message to Authors

Abstract

Education is widely recognized as a foundational pillar of social and economic development. Yet, in practice, the effectiveness of any education system is not determined by policy frameworks or curriculum design alone but by the lived realities of teachers—their professional status, motivation, and overall well-being.

Decades of scholarship on educational change consistently highlight the central role of teachers in shaping meaningful reform processes (Fullan, 2001; Hargreaves, 1994). In Kyrgyzstan, conversations around the dignity and societal standing of teachers have become increasingly urgent. This study seeks to engage directly with these concerns by examining how teachers themselves understand their professional status, working conditions, and the level of recognition they receive within society.

Drawing on survey data from over 300 teachers across different regions of Kyrgyzstan, this paper explores perceptions of professional recognition, workload, and respect. The findings reveal a profession deeply anchored in purpose. Many teachers describe their work not simply as employment, but as a mission aligned with the intellectual and moral development of the younger generation. Relationships with students, colleagues, and parents emerge as key sources of motivation, reflecting the inherently relational nature of teaching and professional life (Little, 1990).

At the same time, teachers articulate clear and persistent challenges. Increasing administrative demands, limited opportunities for sustained professional development, and a perceived gap between the societal importance of teaching and its public recognition all shape their professional well-being. These experiences resonate with international research emphasizing that teacher effectiveness is closely tied to professional respect, supportive working conditions, and strong systems of preparation and development (Darling-Hammond, 2017).

By bringing teachers’ voices to the center of the discussion, this study underscores the importance of strengthening both the professional status and public recognition of educators as a core component of educational development. The findings contribute to broader regional and global conversations on teacher professionalism, educational reform, and well-being in Kyrgyzstan and the wider Central Asian region.

References

Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). Empowered educators: How high-performing systems shape teaching quality around the world. Jossey-Bass.

Fullan, M. (2001). The new meaning of educational change (3rd ed.). Teachers College Press.

Hargreaves, A. (1994). Changing teachers, changing times: Teachers’ work and culture in the postmodern age. Cassell.

Little, J. W. (1990). The persistence of privacy: Autonomy and initiative in teachers’ professional relations. Teachers College Record, 91(4), 509–536.

Send message to Author

Abstract

Legacy language materials: field notes, transcriptions, and audio recordings created by earlier generations of researchers, occupy a privileged position in the study and revitalization of endangered languages. When a language is no longer transmitted to children, when remaining speakers are elderly and few, and when contemporary speech is visibly marked by contact-induced change and domain restriction, materials collected decades earlier inevitably come to be perceived as capturing something more "complete," more "authentic," more "true." This perception is shared, though for different reasons, by linguists seeking diachronic baselines and by community members seeking an uncompromised model for revitalization.

This paper argues that the purity attributed to legacy materials is an ideological construction that obscures the cumulative mediations inherent in any archival record. Drawing on the Tomsk Field Archive of Siberian Indigenous Languages - a collection of over 180 volumes of handwritten field notes covering eight languages across four genetic groupings, assembled over four decades of systematic documentation beginning in 1947, I trace five categories of mediation, what I term "degrees of separation," between the archived record and the communicative events it purports to represent. These include the interpretive filtering inherent in real-time field transcription, the systematic smoothing introduced through secondary editing and "cleaning," the analytical choices embedded in notation normalization, the structural transformations imposed by digital rendering, and the epistemic flattening that occurs when legacy and contemporary data are integrated into undifferentiated multimedia databases.

Using Irvine and Gal's (2000) framework of language ideology, I show how two semiotic processes sustain the perception of archival purity. Iconization collapses the distinction between the archive and the language it documents, such that the collection comes to stand for the language itself. Erasure renders the successive mediations invisible, stripping legacy materials of their production history and presenting them as transparent windows onto a past linguistic reality. Together, these processes generate a paradox: the most heavily mediated version of the data, the one furthest removed from original speech events, carries the greatest institutional authority.

The paper concludes by drawing out implications in three domains: source-critical research practice, including a proposal for systematic "mediation metadata"; meaningful Indigenous data governance under the CARE Principles, with attention to the specific constraints of the Russian institutional context; and a broader reconsideration of archival purity as an ideological phenomenon that shapes not only how legacy materials are used but how "language" itself is conceptualized in documentary and revitalization work.