Log in to star items.
- Format:
- Panel
- Theme:
- Economics
Accepted papers
Abstract
This paper explores how modernizing trade procedures directly fuels trade turnover, focusing on Uzbekistan’s unique position as a reforming, double landlocked economy. While landlockedness is often viewed as a geographic trap, this study conceptualizes trade facilitation—spanning institutional, procedural, and digital reforms—as a critical tool for neutralizing high transaction costs and cross-border uncertainty. To test this, I apply an augmented gravity model to a panel dataset of Uzbekistan’s bilateral trade with 145 partner countries, using OECD Trade Facilitation Indicators as primary proxies.
The econometric results reveal a clear and statistically significant link: a 0.1-point improvement in the Trade Facilitation Index is associated with an approximately 9% increase in bilateral trade volume. These findings support the argument that cutting red tape and streamlining logistics functions as an "implicit tariff reduction," effectively opening markets without formal treaty changes. My analysis further identifies automation, information transparency, and inter-agency synchronization as the most impactful drivers of this expansion.
Moving beyond the numbers, the paper bridges the gap between quantitative data and institutional reality. By synthesizing best practices from the WTO, World Bank, and CAREC frameworks, I propose a practical roadmap for reform centered on border digitalization and coordinated management. Ultimately, the study argues that for transition economies like Uzbekistan, trade facilitation is not just a technical box-ticking exercise, but a strategic pillar for surviving and thriving within global value chains. The insights offered here carry broader weight for Central Asia, illustrating how targeted procedural shifts can overcome geographic hurdles to build regional economic resilience.
Abstract
This research examines the industrial policy pathways of Kyrgyzstan and Kazakhstan, focusing on post-independence de‑industrialisation of the 1990s and re‑industrialisation efforts since the 2000s. While existing literature has extensively covered the economic transformation of former planned economies, the unique pattern of industrialisation–de‑industrialisation–re‑industrialisation in these Central Asian nations remains understudied. Using a mixed‑methods approach combining policy document analysis, economic indicators, and the index of revealed comparative advantage, this study investigates how industrial policies have shaped the economic structure of both countries over three decades.
Preliminary findings suggest divergent outcomes driven by differences in resource endowment. Kazakhstan’s oil‑driven economy enabled more ambitious industrial policies; however, its export complexity has shown limited improvement. Kyrgyzstan, with fewer natural resources, pursued lighter industrialisation focused on textiles, food processing, and re‑exports, achieving modest gains in economic complexity despite significant resource constraints.
The study contributes to the development economics literature by demonstrating how resource endowments, institutional capacity, and policy choices interact to shape industrial development trajectories in these economies.