to star items.

T0250


From Economic Instrument to Public Value: The Evolution of Higher Education Policy Discourse in Kazakhstan 
Author:
Zhanerke Kochiigit (Eurasian institute for humanitarian research)
Send message to Author
Format:
Individual paper
Theme:
Education

Abstract

This paper examines the transformation of the discourse on higher education in Kazakhstan, tracing its evolution from an economically instrumental value toward a broader understanding as a public and societal good. The study explores how the positioning of education within state policy has shifted over time, reflecting changing priorities in governance, development, and nation-building.

The analysis is based on a qualitative review of key strategic and regulatory documents, including state programs, sectoral concepts, and presidential addresses as core agenda-setting texts. Particular attention is given to the Concept for the Development of Higher Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan (2023–2029), as well as earlier policy frameworks, in order to identify discursive shifts in the framing of education. The paper also examines the constitutional foundations of education as a public good, with particular attention to the recent constitutional reforms in Kazakhstan, and analyzes the extent to which these renewed normative commitments are reflected in policy implementation.

The central argument is that Kazakhstan’s education policy reflects a discursive shift without full policy realignment. While official narratives increasingly emphasize the societal and public value dimensions of education, actual policy instruments and governance mechanisms remain largely anchored in economic rationality, efficiency, and labor market responsiveness. This creates a structural tension between declared goals and implemented practices.

By situating this case within broader debates on human capital, public value, and post-Soviet governance transformation, the paper contributes to the literature by demonstrating how discursive change can precede, but not necessarily guarantee, substantive policy transformation. It argues that understanding this gap is critical for assessing the future trajectory of education reforms in transitional contexts.