Click the star to add/remove an item to/from your individual schedule.
You need to be logged in to avail of this functionality, and to see the links to virtual rooms.

Accepted Paper:

Informal Justice in Kyrgyzstan and Religious Norms: Opt-In or Opt-Out?  
Natalia Alenkina (American University of Central Asia) Nurlan Ismailov (Ataturk-Alatoo International University)

Send message to Authors

Paper abstract:

The main focus of the study is the use of religion as an informal regulator of social relations* by the official legal institution – the Court of Aksakals (court of elders)**.

The data of the field study conducted by the authors during 2022 in all the regions of Kyrgyzstan show a clear trend toward increasing Islamisation of the population and dispute resolution mechanisms, especially in the southern regions of the republic.

Various channels are used for this purpose:

- religious leaders are elected as members of the Courts of Aksakals;

- the Courts of Aksakals invite religious leaders to court sessions for consultation if a dispute involves religious issues (religious divorce (uch talaq), polygamy, dowry, etc.);

- Aksakal Courts use an oath on a holy book (Koran) as evidence in resolving a dispute;

- Aksakal Courts use the authority of religious leaders to reconcile parties;

- Aksakal courts refer disputes to religious leaders, and conversely, religious leaders refer disputes to the Courts of Aksakals.

Our hypothesis is that the process of Islamization in the Aksakal Courts practice can develop in two directions:

1. Controlled Islamisation: when the norms of religion will be applied in a way that does not contradict the law. Shariah norms will not be used directly, but as part of the cultural code of the Kyrgyz: through the norms of ethics, morality, traditions, and customs.

2. Out-of-control Islamisation. This will lead to the fact that the Shariah norms will be opposed to the law. In particular, it will be legalized to decrease the marriage age to 16, polygamy, and home education for children. Sharia courts will be set up in some localities as a parallel justice system.

Obviously, the first scenario is preponderant in the political-legal sense. In this respect, the Courts of Aksakals, which have not only a dispute resolution function but also an educational and legal propaganda function, are a deterrent to the uncontrolled spread of religion and therefore need the support of the state.

* Religious norms are not part of Kyrgyzstan's formal legal system

** Aksakal courts (courts of elders) are constitutionally recognised as a non-state body for conflict resolution and prevention at the local level

Panel REL02
Legal and Religious Norms in Central Asia
  Session 1 Saturday 21 October, 2023, -