Click the star to add/remove an item to/from your individual schedule.
You need to be logged in to avail of this functionality, and to see the links to virtual rooms.

GEND03


Polygynous Marriages Among the Kyrgyz: Institutional Change and Endurance 
Convenor:
Michele Commercio (University of Vermont)
Send message to Convenor
Chair:
Adrienne Edgar (U.C. Santa Barbara)
Discussants:
Marianne Kamp (Indiana University, CEUS)
Aksana Ismailbekova (Leibniz-Zentrum Moderner Orient (ZMO))
Naomi Ntakiyica (Humboldt Universität zu Berlin)
Cholpon Turdalieva (American University of Central Asia)
Format:
Scholarship-in-Progress forum
Theme:
Gender Studies
Location:
William Pitt Union (WPU): room 548
Sessions:
Friday 20 October, -
Time zone: America/New_York

:

This author-critic forum is discussing the first English language book on polygynous marriages among Central Asians. This multidisciplinary analysis, which is based in large part on the opinions of Kyrgyz men and women in polygynous marriages, provides insight into polygynous marriages among the Kyrgyz prior to, during, and following Soviet colonization.

Abstract:

During Soviet rule, the state all but imposed atheism on the primarily Islamic people of Kyrgyzstan and limited the tradition of polygyny—a form of polygamy in which one man has multiple wives. Polygyny did continue under communism, though chiefly under concealment. In the decades since the fall of the Soviet Union, the practice has reemerged. Based on extensive fieldwork, Polygynous Marriages among the Kyrgyz argues that this marriage practice has become socially acceptable and widely dispersed not only because it is rooted in customary law and Islamic practice, but because it can also enable men and women to meet societal expectations and solve practical economic problems that resulted from the fall of the Soviet Union. Michele E. Commercio’s analysis suggests the normalization of polygyny among the Kyrgyz in contemporary Kyrgyzstan is due both to institutional change in the form of altered governmental rules and expectations and to institutional endurance in the form of persistent hegemonic constructions of gender.