Click the star to add/remove an item to/from your individual schedule.
You need to be logged in to avail of this functionality.
Log in
- Convenor:
-
. CESS
Send message to Convenor
- Discussant:
-
Michael Brose
(Indiana University)
- Formats:
- Panel
- Theme:
- Political Science & International Relations
- Location:
- GA 4067
- Sessions:
- Saturday 22 October, -
Time zone: America/Indiana/Knox
Abstract:
PIR02
Accepted papers:
Session 1 Saturday 22 October, 2022, -Paper abstract:
This paper is concerned with themes of urban development and governance. Specifically, I examine how the Chinese-administered Belt and Road Initiative may cater to the evolving needs of cities. To explore these themes, I ask the following research questions: does China cater to a new kind of urbanity? To what degree does the Belt and Road initiative seem to shape urbanity? The evolution of city needs in conjunction with the developing technological capacities globally has prompted a desire to integrate technology into urban life as well as urban governance, paving the way for “Smart Cities”. As we consider the implications of digital governance on authority and its relationship with its citizens, this paper discusses how technology engages with notions of increased individual autonomy while simultaneously succumbing to a new type of authority. Using academic literature and media news sources, I collected information on current developments in Kazakhstan in two cases, Nur-Sultan and Almaty. I argue that the Belt and Road does cater to new urban trends by promoting connectivity and innovative infrastructure. However, the trends are not created by the Belt and Road Initiative itself, rather they are present in the country of interest much like a river current is part of its geography. The Belt and Road Initiative, its projects, and its funding, steers these existing urban trends in a specific direction, shaping the riverbanks of domestic policy through naturally occurring abrasion. The findings of this paper point to three ways in which Chinese trends steer domestic trends: “hard” participation in local development through the lending or donating of resources. (i.e.. Tablets, gadgets, general tech, etc.); “soft” participation in local development through the exchange of ideas. (i.e.. Conferences, symposiums, etc.); and “independent” participation in local development through identified BRI projects. Considering the BRI’s focus on technology and telecommunication infrastructure, this essay explores an interesting relationship between the BRI and city needs and contributes to literature on governance and development.
Paper abstract:
Growing capital over-accumulation and excessive industrial production have forced policymakers in Beijing to search for profitable outlets overseas. The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), which focuses on infrastructure connectivity projects across Eurasia, reflects these efforts. This paper focuses on BRI-led projects in Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan and theorizes it as a spatial fix, aimed to overcome the recurring problem of over-accumulation of capital. I argue that Beijing is capitalizing on the infrastructural and economic woes of host states to externalize its domestic economic woes. I further argue that Beijing's official rhetoric of a win-win is contradictory for the reason that BRI projects, although allowing China to relocate its resources successfully, have had a limited impact on the production capacity of the host states. As a result, the host states receives only accumulated stock of fixed capital and increase in debt burdens. This paper is based on published material and unstructured interviews with experts on Central Asia. The argument that China's development financing under the BRI is for its own economic development will add a novel perspective in the literature available.