Click the star to add/remove an item to/from your individual schedule.
You need to be logged in to avail of this functionality.
Log in
- Convenors:
-
Yuan Gao
(Case Western Reserve University)
Cloé Drieu (CNRS)
Send message to Convenors
- Theme:
- HIS
- Location:
- IMES Room 512
- Sessions:
- Thursday 10 October, -
Time zone: America/New_York
Long Abstract:
This panel brings together three studies of Soviet Central Asian film in order to understand how these films became sites of negotiation for locally-specific discourses on issues of nation and gender. Through careful analyses of these films, their production, as well as the narratives present within the films and around their production, these papers seek to understand trajectories of post-1930 national identities in Uzbekistan and Tajikistan and to understand their inter-relatedness to concepts of gender and a pan-Soviet identity.
The three papers are interrelated both geographically and thematically. Zukhra Kasimova's paper looks at the Soviet Uzbek film You are Not an Orphan (1962), a feature film loosely based on the real story of the Shomakhmudov family, and at the Soviet documentary titled Life on a Collective farm (1968) featuring a female head of a provincial collective farm who adopted 10 children. Kasimova's paper compares this film and other coverage of the Shomakhmudov family with the case of Fatima Kasimova, another case of large war-time orphan adoption in Soviet Uzbekistan, which received significantly less press coverage. Kasimova shows how films in the 1960s were an important site for negotiation of Soviet Uzbekness and demonstrates the possibility for multiple localized discourses of Soviet modernity. Nicholas Seay's paper looks at post-war Tajik feature films dedicated to the early period of Soviet rule in Tajikistan. Looking at three films (Dokhunda (1956), Chelovek Menyaet Kozhu, 1959, and Khasan Arbakesh (1965)) Seay's paper argues that these films emerged as a discernible category which looked at this early period and ultimately helped create a sense of Soviet Tajikness; as was the case with the literary works upon which these films were based, these films testify to the contested nature of official Tajik national identity. Finally, Gordiya Khademian's paper looks at performance negotiation and concepts of Tajik nationalism in three different films from the late Soviet period. By focusing on dance performances present throughout these films (Nisso, Youth's First Morning (1979) and Lullaby (1966)) and the 1966 Concert of Tajik Masters of Arts Khademian stresses the important legacy of early Soviet nationality policy. She shows how the debates around such performances reframed narratives of national modernity and based them on notions of the past. By looking at this late period, she demonstrates the limitations of national cultural policy, while shedding light on the emergence of national movements and identities in the late Soviet period.
Accepted papers:
Session 1 Thursday 10 October, 2019, -Paper long abstract:
This paper analyzes four feature films (Dokhunda (1956); Chelovek Menyaet Kozhu, 1959; Khasan Arbakesh, 1965) from Tajikfilm Studios released in the late 1950s and 1960s. Throughout the paper, I explore the relationship between the films and the literary works upon which they were based, as well as the film directors, screenwriters and writers' whose works provided the original source material.In addition to exploring the role of 'locals' and 'outsiders' in the creation of these cultural products, I argue that a discernible category of film emerged out of the Tajik Film Studios. While this type of film existed elsewhere in the Soviet Union around the same time, the Tajik context is important - starting with Dokhunda, the first Tajik feature film since the 1930s, these films exploration of the early period of Soviet rule in Tajikistan became an important way for articulating a visual Tajik national identity. Far from a preconceived notion of Tajik national identity, the diversity in the three films selected, indicative of a larger trend among Tajik Film Studio films, demonstrates that the vision of the Tajik nation, as had been the case in Tajik literature, past and present continued to be a contested process. This paper is based on the novels, poems, and corresponding films in question, as well as available newspaper sources from Pravda, Literaturnaia Gazeta, as well as a range of secondary sources.
Paper long abstract:
My paper will focus on Tajik dance performances in concerts and films, from Khrushchev's thaw to the late 1970s. My main question is what these dance performances reveal about the performative negotiations and conceptions of Tajik nationalism and sovereignty in the post-Stalin era of the Soviet Union. Using dance performances from two different film genres, Nisso, Youth's First Morning (1979) and Lullaby (1966), as well performances from the 1966 Concert of Tajik Masters of Arts, I will argue for the contested nature of Tajik nationalism within Soviet cultural institutions, where the legacies of early Soviet nationality policy are present within narratives of a national modernity based in notions of the past. This time period sheds light on the emerging space for nationalist movements and identities, as well as the continuing limitations of nationalist cultural policy. This paper will draw from film, poetry, newspaper sources, as well as secondary literature.
Paper long abstract:
The single most famous example of an Uzbek family that adopted evacuated children during WWII is the family of the blacksmith Shomakhmudov and his wife. Directed by Shukhrat Abbasov in 1962, "You Are Not an Orphan" was the title of the Uzbekfilm movie, loosely based on the Shomakhmudovs story.
I will analyze the movie to understand what impact it had on the post-war meaning of Soviet Uzbekness and the power relationships within the "family" of Soviet nations.
I will compare the Shomakhmudovs case to another significant single parent family that suggests different family model-single parent one. An Uzbek woman, Fatima Kasimova, became a sole caregiver to the 10 adoptees, while serving as a head of the collective farm.
Unlike the Shomakhmudovs, this case received relatively little Soviet press coverage. I argue that this disparity in publicity highlights limitations of the Soviet modernity discourse, both central and Uzbek. Kasimova family was deemed incomplete and hence deficient. In the eyes of the Soviet state, Kasimova suffered from three "deficiencies" -female, rural, and Uzbek (though the lack of male labor on collective farms during and after WWII allowed her to rise to the rank of the head of a farm). However, the very fact of Kasimova's successful career proves that the post-WWII integration of Central Asians into the Soviet norms was not a rigidly gendered (male only) phenomenon - though the Soviet public discourse still did not have a proper language to incorporate these cases into a larger framework. Success stories like Kasimova's were a perfect fit for Soviet women's magazines, but not for daily news with extensive coverage like Komsomolskaia Pravda, or Soviet Uzbekistan. This success story of a Muslim Soviet woman serves as an illustration of the socio-cultural hybridity of Soviet discourse. The central party press picked the case of complete family with the man at its center (Shomakhmudovs). The press for women as well as the authors of the late 1950s documentary about Uzbek collective farms selected this single mother and a kolkhoz leader as Soviet woman who successfully sustained the double-burden of "production and reproduction". The two discourses are not entirely contradictory, and both worked at decentering and hybridizing Soviet examples as centered on Russian/European norm of femininity, masculinity and family.