Click the star to add/remove an item to/from your individual schedule.
You need to be logged in to avail of this functionality.
Log in
- Convenors:
-
Alejandro Camargo
(Université de Montréal)
Luisa Cortesi (International Institute of Social Studies)
- Stream:
- Living landscapes: Food and Water Flows/Paysages vivants: Flots d'aliments et d'eau
- Location:
- FSS 12003
- Start time:
- 5 May, 2017 at
Time zone: America/New_York
- Session slots:
- 2
Short Abstract:
This panel seeks to discuss the quotidian epistemologies, technologies, and practices of contestation that people mobilize in the midst of catastrophic floods. By doing so, the papers aim to reflect on the everyday experiences of life and death in the face of global disasters and climate change.
Long Abstract:
The current situation of global disasters and accelerating climate change has shown that catastrophic floods are at the center of the major threats to humanity. In this context, apocalyptic narratives on the fragility of the world have been driven by accounts and images of disastrous floodwaters disrupting social orders and destroying both landscapes and lives. But how are these unstable and often unpredictable waters actually experienced by people in their everyday life? How do men and women narrate and make sense of these catastrophic hydrologies while living with and witnessing how others have died from them? What kind of technologies, epistemologies, and practices are mobilized to counteract the devastating manifestation of floods? This panel seeks to discuss these questions in light of ethnographic materials that explore the experience of life and death in flooding environments. We aim to understand how catastrophic floods shape, and are shaped by, quotidian interpretations, metaphors, and practices at the intersection of nature, culture, and technology. While predominant approaches to floods mainly focus on global impacts, large-scale control infrastructures, political economy, and the production of vulnerability, this panel proposes a view of the day-to-day texture of the epistemologies and politics of water-related disasters.
Accepted papers:
Session 1Paper short abstract:
Analysis of 2 flood-prone NYC districts compares low-income community organizing for climate resilience after Superstorm Sandy. Uneven development and residents’ varied relationships to coastal living influenced flooding as call to activism on the Lower East Side, Manhattan and in Rockaway, Queens.
Paper long abstract:
This paper presents empirical research conducted in two of the most flood-prone districts in NYC - the Lower East Side, a gentrifying neighborhood in Manhattan, and Rockaway, a socio-spatially isolated neighborhood in Queens. We investigate community organizing of low-income residents for climate resilience in a post-disaster context, after Superstorm Sandy. Results show that both the operationalization of resilience and the community capacity to organize for the improved resilience of low-income residents are strongly influenced by pre-existing urban development dynamics and civic infrastructure - the socio-spatial networks of community-based organizations - in each neighborhood. The Lower East Side, with its long history of community activism and awareness of gentrification threats, was better able to mobilize broadly and collectively around resilience needs while the more socio-spatially isolated neighborhoods on the Rockaway peninsula were more constrained. Furthermore, in Rockaway, residents evoke a varied but widespread sense of living in delicate balance with the water. As such, Sandy's impact as a "focusing event" for climate adaptation is dampened, whereas activists on the Lower East Side saw "a flood" as a "wake-up call" for climate change organizing.
Paper short abstract:
This paper examines the chronology of interventions that took place between the blockade of the Tsarap river in Zanskar in 2015 and the burst of the lake it created, triggering the Phuktal flood. Conflicting epistemologies of time impacted the perception of risk associated with the flood.
Paper long abstract:
In early January 2015, a landslide in the mountains created an artificial lake of approximately 10 km on the Tsarap river in Zanskar, an isolated region of the Indian Himalayas. While the impending burst of the lake was threatening the populations downstream, experts from India's National Disaster Management Authority (NDMA) were deployed to handle the situation. As a preventive measure, authorities closed the Chadar, an ice thoroughfare which is the sole means of circulation in and out of the region in winter, and a trek which has become a popular destination for adventure tourism in recent years, thus generating frustration among Zanskarpas. In this paper, I examine the chronology of events and interventions that took place between the blockade of the river and the eventual burst of the lake in spring, triggering the Phuktal flood. I focus on the various technologies considered by the NDMA to drain the lake and the alternative solutions suggested by local people. I maintain that conflicting epistemologies of time between the state and the local population were reinforced by prevailing distrust for governmental institutions in a region that has long been marginalized, ending up, ultimately, in impacting the perception of risk associated with the flood.
Paper short abstract:
This presentation reflects on how particular acts and narratives of memory are produced in the aftermath of catastrophic floods in Northern Colombia.
Paper long abstract:
A number of authors have pointed out that the aftermath of crises and catastrophic events are crucial moments for the production of collective memory. Although this scholarship has enriched our understanding of the politics of remembering, however, little has been said about the place of the environment in the making of discourses and practices of recollection. This presentation reflects on how particular acts and narratives of memory are produced in the aftermath of catastrophic floods. Drawing on my ethnographic fieldwork during the reconstruction of a rural area in Northern Colombia, which was destroyed by floods in 2010, I will develop two arguments. First, in the context of environmental disasters, the production of memory can also be understood as a process of nature making. In Northern Colombia, the memories of the catastrophe involved the reconceptualization of water as a disastrous element and as a conduit of social suffering, rather than a benevolent source of life. Second, the production of memory is a political act in which the recollection of dramatic events and devastated natures serve as a platform to legitimize political claims vis-à-vis the state. These claims include, for instance, the intervention of the state to provide solutions to the crisis. I will analyze how people deployed performances, drawings, photographs, and oral narratives as tools for the construction of collective memories, ideas of disastrous water, and interactions with the state.